Nonclinical precedent Request an invite

Kerendia

finerenone
small moleculeMineralocorticoid receptorOral non-steroidal mineralocorticoid receptor antagonistChronic kidney disease with type 2 diabetes
Species
RatDog
Longest study
39 wk
Genotox
Conducted Conducted
Carcinogenicity
Conducted Conducted
Repro
Conducted Conducted
First dose
Not conducted Not stated publicly

Speciesopen answer page →

Species
Rat and dog
“Even so, general toxicity studies using oral gavage exposure are available for mouse, rat and dog, where rat and dog are considered main general toxicology species and have been used for studies of up to 26- and 39-weeks duration respectively.”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 31Source ↗
Why that species
Pharmacologically relevant based on receptor binding and metabolite formation
“Both species are considered pharmacologically relevant based on appropriate binding data and formation of metabolites.”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 31Source ↗
Surrogate molecule
No surrogate; the clinical compound was tested
“The oral route (oral gavage) has been used throughout the study programme, as this route is the intended clinical route.”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 31Source ↗
Species: general tox
Rat (up to 26 weeks) and dog (up to 39 weeks); mouse in shorter studies
“Even so, general toxicity studies using oral gavage exposure are available for mouse, rat and dog, where rat and dog are considered main general toxicology species and have been used for studies of up to 26- and 39-weeks duration respectively.”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 31Source ↗
Species: DART
Rat (fertility, EFD, pre/postnatal) and rabbit (EFD)
“a full battery of reproductive toxicology studies (including a fertility and early embryonic development study in rat, embryofetal developmental toxicity studies in rat and rabbit and a pre-and postnatal development study in rat)”
✓ VerifiedFDA integrated review, p. 56Source ↗
Species: carcinogenicity
Mouse and rat (2-year each)
“and two 2-year carcinogenicity studies in mouse and rat.”
✓ VerifiedFDA integrated review, p. 56Source ↗
Surrogate used in
No surrogate used; rat and dog pharmacologically relevant
“Both species are considered pharmacologically relevant based on appropriate binding data and formation of metabolites.”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 31Source ↗

Study lengthopen answer page →

Longest pivotal study
39 (9-month dog)
“Even so, general toxicity studies using oral gavage exposure are available for mouse, rat and dog, where rat and dog are considered main general toxicology species and have been used for studies of up to 26- and 39-weeks duration respectively.”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 31Source ↗
Pivotal GLP studies
26-week rat and 39-week dog oral gavage studies
“Even so, general toxicity studies using oral gavage exposure are available for mouse, rat and dog, where rat and dog are considered main general toxicology species and have been used for studies of up to 26- and 39-weeks duration respectively.”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 31Source ↗
Route in tox
Oral gavage
“The oral route (oral gavage) has been used throughout the study programme, as this route is the intended clinical route.”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 31Source ↗

Skipped studiesopen answer page →

Genotoxicity
Negative in Ames, in vitro chromosomal aberration and in vivo mouse micronucleus assays
“Finerenone was also negative in the in vitro chromosomal aberration assay in mammalian cells and in the in vivo mouse micronucleus test.”
✓ VerifiedFDA integrated review, p. 59Source ↗
Carcinogenicity
2-year mouse and rat: no significant increase in neoplasms
“Two-year carcinogenicity studies conducted in mice and rats showed no significant increase in neoplasms in males or females in either study; the CDER Exec CAC concurred with this conclusion.”
✓ VerifiedFDA integrated review, p. 59Source ↗
Reproductive & developmental
Rat EFD: reduced fetal weight and retarded ossification at maternally toxic 10 mg/kg/day (19x unbound AUC)
“In the embryo-fetal toxicity study in rats, finerenone resulted in reduced placental weights and signs of fetal toxicity, including reduced fetal weights and retarded ossification at the maternal toxic dose of 10 mg/kg/day, corresponding to an AUC unbound of 19 times that in humans.”
✓ VerifiedFDA integrated review, p. 80Source ↗
Safety pharmacology
No adverse CNS, respiratory, hemodynamic/ECG or hERG effects
“Finerenone showed no adverse effects on CNS parameters and respiratory functions (rat), on hemodynamic/ECG parameters (dog), and on cardiac repolarization in vitro (hERG K+ current).”
✓ VerifiedFDA integrated review, p. 57Source ↗
Genotox: Ames
Negative in five S. typhimurium strains up to 5.0 mg/plate, with and without S9
“finerenone did not induce gene mutations by base-pair changes or frame-shifts in the genome of five S. typhimurium strains when tested up to a maximum recommended dose of 5.0 mg/plate in the absence and presence of S9 mix.”
✓ VerifiedFDA integrated review, p. 59Source ↗
Genotox: in vitro mammalian
In vitro chromosomal aberration assay in mammalian cells: negative
“Finerenone was also negative in the in vitro chromosomal aberration assay in mammalian cells and in the in vivo mouse micronucleus test.”
✓ VerifiedFDA integrated review, p. 59Source ↗
Genotox: in vivo
Mouse micronucleus: negative
“Finerenone was also negative in the in vitro chromosomal aberration assay in mammalian cells and in the in vivo mouse micronucleus test.”
✓ VerifiedFDA integrated review, p. 59Source ↗
Carcinogenicity model
2-year mouse and 2-year rat; no significant increase in neoplasms (Exec CAC concurred)
“Two-year carcinogenicity studies conducted in mice and rats showed no significant increase in neoplasms in males or females in either study; the CDER Exec CAC concurred with this conclusion.”
✓ VerifiedFDA integrated review, p. 59Source ↗
Carcinogenicity timing
2-year mouse and 2-year rat studies completed before the marketing application
“a full battery of reproductive toxicology studies (including a fertility and early embryonic development study in rat, embryofetal developmental toxicity studies in rat and rabbit and a pre-and postnatal development study in rat), and two 2-year carcinogenicity studies in mouse and rat.”
✓ VerifiedFDA integrated review, p. 56Source ↗
hERG / QT
hERG IC50 86 µmol/L, ~200x total and 2400x unbound clinical Cmax
“The hERG IC50 was 86 µmol/L (33 mg/L), which is approximately 200 times the total clinical Cmax (161 µg/L), and 2400 times the free fraction (Cmax, unbound 13.4 µg/L; fu 8.3%).”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 27Source ↗

First doseopen answer page →

First-in-human starting dose
Not stated in public reviews
Why it's blank

The public FDA and EMA reviews of Kerendia don't say how the first human dose was chosen. That rationale is in the IND, which is confidential, so it is missing for most approved products.

How it's usually set for small molecules outside oncology

Find the highest dose with no adverse effects (NOAEL) in each animal species, convert it to a human equivalent dose, usually by body surface area, pick the most appropriate species, then divide by a safety factor (default 10) to get the maximum recommended starting dose.

“In general, one should consider using a safety factor of at least 10. The MRSD should be obtained by dividing the HED by the safety factor.”
✓ VerifiedFDA 2005: Estimating the Maximum Safe Starting Dose in Initial Clinical…, p. 7Source ↗
This product's starting point

NOAEL / key findings: Exaggerated pharmacology: adrenals (rat, dog) and reduced prostate size (dog) (FDA integrated review, p. 58)

Full method, every step sourced →

NOAEL / key findings
Exaggerated pharmacology: adrenals (rat, dog) and reduced prostate size (dog)
“Target organs of exaggerated pharmacology after chronic treatment were the adrenals in both the rat and dog and also the prostate in the dog (decrease in prostate size and weight not accompanied by histopathological changes).”
✓ VerifiedFDA integrated review, p. 58Source ↗

Risksopen answer page →

Immune & cytokine safety
Not stated in public reviews
Not reported in the public reviews. Reviewers summarise selectively, so this usually means it wasn't discussed publicly, not that it wasn't studied.
Biodistribution & persistence
No specific affinity for melanin-bearing tissues (eye, skin) in pigmented rats
“Similar results were obtained in pigmented Long Evans rats and there was no indication of any specific affinity of substance-associated radioactivity to melanin bearing tissues such as eye wall or skin.”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 30Source ↗
Modality-specific risk
Disproportionate human metabolite M-1 (qualified in 9-month dog study)
“In the dog 9-month study, the disproportionate human metabolite M-1 was qualified.”
✓ VerifiedFDA integrated review, p. 56Source ↗
Anti-drug antibodies: animals
Not stated in public reviews
Not reported in the public reviews. Reviewers summarise selectively, so this usually means it wasn't discussed publicly, not that it wasn't studied.
Anti-drug antibodies: patients
Not stated in public reviews
Not reported in the public reviews. Reviewers summarise selectively, so this usually means it wasn't discussed publicly, not that it wasn't studied.
Label warnings
  • Hyperkalemia
  • Worsening of Renal Function in Patients with Heart Failure
Metabolic & endocrineNephrotoxicityCardiovascular
US prescribing information, Warnings and PrecautionsDailyMed ↗

Tox packageopen answer page →

Before first-in-human

First-in-human: where
Not stated in public reviews
Not reported in the public reviews. Reviewers summarise selectively, so this usually means it wasn't discussed publicly, not that it wasn't studied.
Repeat-dose tox before first-in-human
Not stated in public reviews
Not reported in the public reviews. Reviewers summarise selectively, so this usually means it wasn't discussed publicly, not that it wasn't studied.
First-in-human starting dose
Not stated in public reviews
Why it's blank

The public FDA and EMA reviews of Kerendia don't say how the first human dose was chosen. That rationale is in the IND, which is confidential, so it is missing for most approved products.

How it's usually set for small molecules outside oncology

Find the highest dose with no adverse effects (NOAEL) in each animal species, convert it to a human equivalent dose, usually by body surface area, pick the most appropriate species, then divide by a safety factor (default 10) to get the maximum recommended starting dose.

“In general, one should consider using a safety factor of at least 10. The MRSD should be obtained by dividing the HED by the safety factor.”
✓ VerifiedFDA 2005: Estimating the Maximum Safe Starting Dose in Initial Clinical…, p. 7Source ↗
This product's starting point

NOAEL / key findings: Exaggerated pharmacology: adrenals (rat, dog) and reduced prostate size (dog) (FDA integrated review, p. 58)

Full method, every step sourced →

Longest repeat-dose systemic studies

Longest repeat-dose study and recovery
39-week dog study with no recovery group
“The finding was only identified in the 39-week study, was considered adverse by the study pathologist and had limited margins to clinical exposure at NOAEL and LOAEL. Further, as no recovery group was used in the study, the potential for recovery is not known.”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 35Source ↗
Pivotal GLP studies
26-week rat and 39-week dog oral gavage studies
“Even so, general toxicity studies using oral gavage exposure are available for mouse, rat and dog, where rat and dog are considered main general toxicology species and have been used for studies of up to 26- and 39-weeks duration respectively.”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 31Source ↗

DART package

Species: DART
Rat (fertility, EFD, pre/postnatal) and rabbit (EFD)
“a full battery of reproductive toxicology studies (including a fertility and early embryonic development study in rat, embryofetal developmental toxicity studies in rat and rabbit and a pre-and postnatal development study in rat)”
✓ VerifiedFDA integrated review, p. 56Source ↗
Reproductive & developmental
Rat EFD: reduced fetal weight and retarded ossification at maternally toxic 10 mg/kg/day (19x unbound AUC)
“In the embryo-fetal toxicity study in rats, finerenone resulted in reduced placental weights and signs of fetal toxicity, including reduced fetal weights and retarded ossification at the maternal toxic dose of 10 mg/kg/day, corresponding to an AUC unbound of 19 times that in humans.”
✓ VerifiedFDA integrated review, p. 80Source ↗
PPND / ePPND: when
PPND in rat completed and included in the marketing application
“a full battery of reproductive toxicology studies (including a fertility and early embryonic development study in rat, embryofetal developmental toxicity studies in rat and rabbit and a pre-and postnatal development study in rat), and two 2-year carcinogenicity studies in mouse and rat.”
✓ VerifiedFDA integrated review, p. 56Source ↗

Carcinogenicity

Species: carcinogenicity
Mouse and rat (2-year each)
“and two 2-year carcinogenicity studies in mouse and rat.”
✓ VerifiedFDA integrated review, p. 56Source ↗
Carcinogenicity model
2-year mouse and 2-year rat; no significant increase in neoplasms (Exec CAC concurred)
“Two-year carcinogenicity studies conducted in mice and rats showed no significant increase in neoplasms in males or females in either study; the CDER Exec CAC concurred with this conclusion.”
✓ VerifiedFDA integrated review, p. 59Source ↗
Carcinogenicity timing
2-year mouse and 2-year rat studies completed before the marketing application
“a full battery of reproductive toxicology studies (including a fertility and early embryonic development study in rat, embryofetal developmental toxicity studies in rat and rabbit and a pre-and postnatal development study in rat), and two 2-year carcinogenicity studies in mouse and rat.”
✓ VerifiedFDA integrated review, p. 56Source ↗

Safety marginopen answer page →

Safety margin at NOAEL
Dog chronic study male NOAEL 0.5 mg/kg: 3x human total AUC (2x unbound)
“Males Females 0.5 5 2110 59500 116 3267 3X (2X) 86X (57X)”
✓ VerifiedFDA integrated review, p. 58Source ↗
NOAEL / key findings
Exaggerated pharmacology: adrenals (rat, dog) and reduced prostate size (dog)
“Target organs of exaggerated pharmacology after chronic treatment were the adrenals in both the rat and dog and also the prostate in the dog (decrease in prostate size and weight not accompanied by histopathological changes).”
✓ VerifiedFDA integrated review, p. 58Source ↗

Efficacy evidenceopen answer page →

Efficacy evidence
Animal models of heart failure and chronic kidney disease: heart and kidney protection
“In vitro and in vivo studies indicate that BAY 94-8862 is a potent and selective mineralocorticoid receptor (MR) antagonist with protective effects on the heart and/or kidney in animal models of heart failure and chronic kidney disease.”
✓ VerifiedFDA integrated review, p. 34Source ↗
Why that model
Not stated in public reviews
Not reported in the public reviews. Reviewers summarise selectively, so this usually means it wasn't discussed publicly, not that it wasn't studied.
Reviewer's view of the efficacy data
EMA: protective effects shown, but high, clinically non-relevant doses limit interpretation and comparison with other MR antagonists
“Nevertheless, the used clinically non-relevant doses should be taken into consideration when interpreting the details of the results and when comparing with other compounds already in clinical use.”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 47Source ↗

Flexibilityopen answer page →

Flexibility accepted
SpeciesAcceptedBeyond the letter
No finerenone MR binding data in mouse or rabbit (carcinogenicity and EFD species); relevance argued by receptor homology
Why: Aldosterone MR affinity in mouse and rabbit preparations and receptor sequence homology; indirect evidence of binding · Weight of evidence
“No data was presented however a thorough justification was presented including affinity to MR with aldosterone in rabbit and mouse preparations and presentations on sequence homologies of the receptors.”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 47Source ↗
“Although only indirect evidence of the binding of finerenone to MR, it is considered that rabbit and mouse are pharmacologically relevant as suitable species in the assessment of finerenone.”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 47Source ↗

Similar precedents