Nonclinical precedent Request an invite

Lynkuet

elinzanetant
small moleculeNK1/NK3 receptorsOral small-molecule dual NK1/NK3 receptor antagonistMenopausal vasomotor symptoms in postmenopausal women
Species
MonkeyRat
Longest study
39 wk
Genotox
Conducted Conducted
Carcinogenicity
Conducted Conducted
Repro
Conducted Conducted
First dose
Not conducted Not stated publicly

Speciesopen answer page →

Species
Rat and cynomolgus monkey
“Pivotal GLP-compliant repeated dose studies were conducted in Sprague Dawley (SD) rats and Cynomolgus monkeys and comprised studies of 4, 13 (two studies), and 26 weeks duration in rats and 4, 13 (two studies) and 39 weeks duration in monkeys.”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 32Source ↗
Why that species
Pharmacological responsiveness (potency, NK receptor sequence homology) plus PK and metabolic profile
“SD rats and Cynomolgus monkeys were selected as species for the investigation of systemic toxicological effects based on pharmacological responsiveness (potency, sequence homology, and pharmacologic effects on the NK receptors) as well as based on the pharmacokinetic and metabolic profile.”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 43Source ↗
Surrogate molecule
No surrogate; the clinical compound was tested
“In the pivotal chronic toxicity studies conducted by the Applicant, including a 26-week study in SD rats (Study R-13894) and a 39-week study in monkeys (Study R-13895), elinzanetant increased levels of the liver-associated enzymes ALT, AST, and ALP.”
✓ VerifiedFDA integrated review, p. 89Source ↗
Species: general tox
Rat (up to 26 weeks) and cynomolgus monkey (up to 39 weeks)
“Pivotal GLP-compliant repeated dose studies were conducted in Sprague Dawley (SD) rats and Cynomolgus monkeys and comprised studies of 4, 13 (two studies), and 26 weeks duration in rats and 4, 13 (two studies) and 39 weeks duration in monkeys.”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 32Source ↗
Species: DART
Rat and rabbit (full reproductive and developmental battery)
“A full battery of reproductive and developmental toxicity studies was conducted in rats and rabbits.”
✓ VerifiedFDA integrated review, p. 259Source ↗
Species: carcinogenicity
Tg rasH2 mouse (6-month) and rat (2-year)
“Elinzanetant’s potential for carcinogenicity was assessed in a six-month carcinogenicity transgenic mouse model (tg RasH2) study in addition to one long-term two-year rat study.”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 34Source ↗
Surrogate used in
No surrogate used; rat and monkey selected for pharmacological responsiveness to elinzanetant
“SD rats and Cynomolgus monkeys were selected as species for the investigation of systemic toxicological effects based on pharmacological responsiveness (potency, sequence homology, and pharmacologic effects on the NK receptors) as well as based on the pharmacokinetic and metabolic profile.”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 43Source ↗

Study lengthopen answer page →

Longest pivotal study
39 (39-week monkey)
“Pivotal GLP-compliant repeated dose studies were conducted in Sprague Dawley (SD) rats and Cynomolgus monkeys and comprised studies of 4, 13 (two studies), and 26 weeks duration in rats and 4, 13 (two studies) and 39 weeks duration in monkeys.”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 32Source ↗
Pivotal GLP studies
26-week SD rat and 39-week cynomolgus monkey chronic studies
“In the pivotal chronic toxicity studies conducted by the Applicant, including a 26-week study in SD rats (Study R-13894) and a 39-week study in monkeys (Study R-13895), elinzanetant increased levels of the liver-associated enzymes ALT, AST, and ALP.”
✓ VerifiedFDA integrated review, p. 89Source ↗
Route in tox
Oral
“The in vivo PK/TK studies with elinzanetant (BAY 3427080) were conducted via oral administration, which is the intended route of administration in humans, in rats and Cynomolgus monkeys which were used for toxicology studies.”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 37Source ↗

Skipped studiesopen answer page →

Genotoxicity
Negative in Ames, mouse lymphoma and rat bone marrow micronucleus assays
“Elinzanetant showed no genotoxic potential in bacterial mutation assay (Ames test), mouse lymphoma assay, and in vivo bone marrow micronucleus test in rats.”
✓ VerifiedFDA integrated review, p. 195Source ↗
Carcinogenicity
2-year rat: uterine (endometrial) tumors and hematolymphoid lymphomas at ≥60 mg/kg/day (29-fold human AUC)
“In a 2-year carcinogenicity study in female rats, oral doses of elinzanetant ≥60 mg/kg/day (29-fold the total AUC(0-24) at the human therapeutic dose) increased the incidence of endometrial adenocarcinoma, the combination of malignant and benign endometrial tumors and squamous cell carcinoma of the uterus, and lymphomas of the hematolymphoid system.”
✓ VerifiedFDA integrated review, p. 195Source ↗
Reproductive & developmental
Pregnancy loss and stillbirth in animal reproduction studies; no fetal malformations
“Based on findings from animal reproduction studies, elinzanetant may cause pregnancy loss or stillbirth when administered during pregnancy. Fetal malformations were not observed in these animal studies.”
✓ VerifiedFDA integrated review, p. 89Source ↗
Safety pharmacology
No major signals in cardiovascular, respiratory and CNS battery; hERG IC50 ~31 µM (14x Cmax)
“Elinzanetant did not generate major safety signals in a complete battery of safety pharmacology studies (cardiovascular, respiratory, and CNS). Elinzanetant inhibited the activity of hERG channels with an IC50 of approximately 31μM that provides multiples of exposure of 14X and 4,820X, based on the maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) and Cmax, unbound at the maximal recommended human dose, respectively.”
✓ VerifiedFDA integrated review, p. 78Source ↗
Genotox: Ames
Negative
“Elinzanetant showed no genotoxic potential in bacterial mutation assay (Ames test), mouse lymphoma assay, and in vivo bone marrow micronucleus test in rats.”
✓ VerifiedFDA integrated review, p. 195Source ↗
Genotox: in vitro mammalian
Mouse lymphoma assay: negative
“Elinzanetant showed no genotoxic potential in bacterial mutation assay (Ames test), mouse lymphoma assay, and in vivo bone marrow micronucleus test in rats.”
✓ VerifiedFDA integrated review, p. 195Source ↗
Genotox: in vivo
Rat bone marrow micronucleus: negative
“Elinzanetant showed no genotoxic potential in bacterial mutation assay (Ames test), mouse lymphoma assay, and in vivo bone marrow micronucleus test in rats.”
✓ VerifiedFDA integrated review, p. 195Source ↗
Carcinogenicity model
6-month Tg rasH2 mouse and 2-year rat
“Elinzanetant’s potential for carcinogenicity was assessed in a six-month carcinogenicity transgenic mouse model (tg RasH2) study in addition to one long-term two-year rat study.”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 34Source ↗
Carcinogenicity timing
Six-month rasH2 mouse and two-year rat completed before the marketing application
“Elinzanetant’s potential for carcinogenicity was assessed in a six-month carcinogenicity transgenic mouse model (tg RasH2) study in addition to one long-term two-year rat study.”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 34Source ↗
hERG / QT
hERG IC50 ~31 µM: 14x Cmax and 4,820x unbound Cmax at MRHD
“Elinzanetant inhibited the activity of hERG channels with an IC50 of approximately 31μM that provides multiples of exposure of 14X and 4,820X, based on the maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) and Cmax, unbound at the maximal recommended human dose, respectively.”
✓ VerifiedFDA integrated review, p. 78Source ↗

First doseopen answer page →

First-in-human starting dose
Not stated in public reviews
Why it's blank

The public FDA and EMA reviews of Lynkuet don't say how the first human dose was chosen. That rationale is in the IND, which is confidential, so it is missing for most approved products.

How it's usually set for small molecules outside oncology

Find the highest dose with no adverse effects (NOAEL) in each animal species, convert it to a human equivalent dose, usually by body surface area, pick the most appropriate species, then divide by a safety factor (default 10) to get the maximum recommended starting dose.

“In general, one should consider using a safety factor of at least 10. The MRSD should be obtained by dividing the HED by the safety factor.”
✓ VerifiedFDA 2005: Estimating the Maximum Safe Starting Dose in Initial Clinical…, p. 7Source ↗
This product's starting point

NOAEL / key findings: PD-related reproductive findings: none adverse up to 25 mg/kg (rat) and 30 mg/kg (monkey), margins 10 and 0.3 (EMA assessment report, p. 32)

Full method, every step sourced →

NOAEL / key findings
PD-related reproductive findings: none adverse up to 25 mg/kg (rat) and 30 mg/kg (monkey), margins 10 and 0.3
“No adverse PD related reproductive findings were observed in rats up to 25 mg/kg and in monkeys up to 30 mg/kg, corresponding to a safety margin of 10 and 0.3, respectively, based on total exposure (AUC0-24).”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 32Source ↗

Risksopen answer page →

Immune & cytokine safety
Thymus atrophy and lymphoid depletion, attributed to treatment-induced stress
“In addition, thymus atrophy, reduced thymus weight or lymphoid depletion of the thymus were noted. The effects observed in adrenal glands and thymus were discussed to be related to treatment-induced stress and non-adverse.”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 33Source ↗
Biodistribution & persistence
Distributes to liver and pigmented tissues (uveal tract, retina); crosses the blood-brain barrier
“Autoradiographic studies revealed that, following the oral administration of radiolabeled elinzanetant to different species, radioactivity distributed to major organs, including the liver and pigmented tissues (e.g., the uveal tract and the retina). In typical PK studies, elinzanetant was also found to cross the blood brain barrier.”
✓ VerifiedFDA integrated review, p. 79Source ↗
Modality-specific risk
CNS-related clinical signs, including convulsions
“Elinzanetant exerted CNS-related clinical signs including convulsions and has a known CNS activity.”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 44Source ↗
Anti-drug antibodies: animals
Not stated in public reviews
Not reported in the public reviews. Reviewers summarise selectively, so this usually means it wasn't discussed publicly, not that it wasn't studied.
Anti-drug antibodies: patients
Not stated in public reviews
Not reported in the public reviews. Reviewers summarise selectively, so this usually means it wasn't discussed publicly, not that it wasn't studied.
Label warnings
  • Central Nervous System (CNS) Depressant Effect and Daytime Impairment
  • Hepatic Transaminase Elevations
  • Risk of Pregnancy Loss
  • Risk of Seizure
NeurotoxicityPsychiatricHepatotoxicityEmbryo-fetal toxicity
US prescribing information, Warnings and PrecautionsDailyMed ↗

Tox packageopen answer page →

Before first-in-human

First-in-human: where
Not stated in public reviews
Not reported in the public reviews. Reviewers summarise selectively, so this usually means it wasn't discussed publicly, not that it wasn't studied.
Repeat-dose tox before first-in-human
Not stated in public reviews
Not reported in the public reviews. Reviewers summarise selectively, so this usually means it wasn't discussed publicly, not that it wasn't studied.
First-in-human starting dose
Not stated in public reviews
Why it's blank

The public FDA and EMA reviews of Lynkuet don't say how the first human dose was chosen. That rationale is in the IND, which is confidential, so it is missing for most approved products.

How it's usually set for small molecules outside oncology

Find the highest dose with no adverse effects (NOAEL) in each animal species, convert it to a human equivalent dose, usually by body surface area, pick the most appropriate species, then divide by a safety factor (default 10) to get the maximum recommended starting dose.

“In general, one should consider using a safety factor of at least 10. The MRSD should be obtained by dividing the HED by the safety factor.”
✓ VerifiedFDA 2005: Estimating the Maximum Safe Starting Dose in Initial Clinical…, p. 7Source ↗
This product's starting point

NOAEL / key findings: PD-related reproductive findings: none adverse up to 25 mg/kg (rat) and 30 mg/kg (monkey), margins 10 and 0.3 (EMA assessment report, p. 32)

Full method, every step sourced →

Longest repeat-dose systemic studies

Longest repeat-dose study and recovery
39-week cynomolgus monkey (oral); no recovery groups in monkey studies
“Recovery groups were included in one of the 13- week rat studies but unfortunately not in Cynomolgus monkeys.”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 43Source ↗
Pivotal GLP studies
26-week SD rat and 39-week cynomolgus monkey chronic studies
“In the pivotal chronic toxicity studies conducted by the Applicant, including a 26-week study in SD rats (Study R-13894) and a 39-week study in monkeys (Study R-13895), elinzanetant increased levels of the liver-associated enzymes ALT, AST, and ALP.”
✓ VerifiedFDA integrated review, p. 89Source ↗

DART package

Species: DART
Rat and rabbit (full reproductive and developmental battery)
“A full battery of reproductive and developmental toxicity studies was conducted in rats and rabbits.”
✓ VerifiedFDA integrated review, p. 259Source ↗
Reproductive & developmental
Pregnancy loss and stillbirth in animal reproduction studies; no fetal malformations
“Based on findings from animal reproduction studies, elinzanetant may cause pregnancy loss or stillbirth when administered during pregnancy. Fetal malformations were not observed in these animal studies.”
✓ VerifiedFDA integrated review, p. 89Source ↗
PPND / ePPND: when
PPND in rat completed before the marketing application
“A pre- and postnatal developmental study was conducted in the rat.”
✓ VerifiedFDA integrated review, p. 262Source ↗

Carcinogenicity

Species: carcinogenicity
Tg rasH2 mouse (6-month) and rat (2-year)
“Elinzanetant’s potential for carcinogenicity was assessed in a six-month carcinogenicity transgenic mouse model (tg RasH2) study in addition to one long-term two-year rat study.”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 34Source ↗
Carcinogenicity model
6-month Tg rasH2 mouse and 2-year rat
“Elinzanetant’s potential for carcinogenicity was assessed in a six-month carcinogenicity transgenic mouse model (tg RasH2) study in addition to one long-term two-year rat study.”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 34Source ↗
Carcinogenicity timing
Six-month rasH2 mouse and two-year rat completed before the marketing application
“Elinzanetant’s potential for carcinogenicity was assessed in a six-month carcinogenicity transgenic mouse model (tg RasH2) study in addition to one long-term two-year rat study.”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 34Source ↗

Safety marginopen answer page →

Safety margin at NOAEL
39-week monkey NOAEL: 0.35x (females, 30 mg/kg/day) and 1x (males, 80 mg/kg/day) MRHD AUC
“39-week repeat dose study in monkeys Female 30 3000 0.35X Male 80 8370 1X”
✓ VerifiedFDA integrated review, p. 265Source ↗
NOAEL / key findings
PD-related reproductive findings: none adverse up to 25 mg/kg (rat) and 30 mg/kg (monkey), margins 10 and 0.3
“No adverse PD related reproductive findings were observed in rats up to 25 mg/kg and in monkeys up to 30 mg/kg, corresponding to a safety margin of 10 and 0.3, respectively, based on total exposure (AUC0-24).”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 32Source ↗

Efficacy evidenceopen answer page →

Efficacy evidence
Mongolian gerbil model: elinzanetant reduced NK-1 agonist (GR-73632)-induced foot tapping
“In a Mongolian gerbil foot tapping model, elinzanetant at intracerebroventricular doses of 1, 3 and 10 mg/kg reduced GR-73632 (NK-1 receptor agonist) induced foot tapping, a behaviour associated with NK-1 receptor agonists.”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 22Source ↗
Why that model
Not stated in public reviews
Not reported in the public reviews. Reviewers summarise selectively, so this usually means it wasn't discussed publicly, not that it wasn't studied.
Reviewer's view of the efficacy data
EMA: mechanism of action sufficiently described; insurmountable high-affinity NK-1/NK-3 antagonist, NK-1 preferring
“In summary, the mechanism of action of elinzanetant has been sufficiently described. Elinzanetant is shown to act as an insurmountable antagonist with high affinity for NK-1 and NK-3 receptors, with a preference for the NK-1 receptor.”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 22Source ↗

Flexibilityopen answer page →

Flexibility accepted
Safety marginVerdict not stated
No margin at 39-week monkey NOAEL: females below 1x and males 1x MRHD AUC
“The NOAEL for females was the low-dose of 30 mg/kg/day, with AUC(0-24) = 3000 µg.h/L (<1 X MRHD) and the NOAEL for males was the high-dose of 80 mg/kg/day, with AUC(0-24) = 8370 µg.h/L (1 X MRHD).”
✓ VerifiedFDA integrated review, p. 457Source ↗
Safety marginVerdict not stated
No margin at the rat pre- and postnatal developmental NOAEL (0.23x MRHD AUC)
“2) At the NOAEL of 1.5 mg/kg/day for developmental toxicity there is no safety margin (0.23 X) based on AUC0-24h of 8572 ng•h/mL (Elinzanetant) obtained from clinical study B002427.”
✓ VerifiedFDA integrated review, p. 598Source ↗
Impurity or metaboliteAcceptedBeyond the letter
2-year rat carcinogenicity study gave very low exposure margins to main metabolites M27 and M18/21
Why: Executive CAC agreed metabolite coverage in the rat carcinogenicity study is adequate · Other reason
“While the carcinogenicity study generated adequate clinical exposure margins for the parent drug and its primary metabolite (M30/34) in rats, it provided very low exposure margins to the other two main metabolites (M27 and M18/21).”
✓ VerifiedFDA integrated review, p. 646Source ↗
“1. The Exec CAC agreed metabolite coverage in rat carcinogenicity study is adequate.”
✓ VerifiedFDA integrated review, p. 638Source ↗
RecoveryQuestioned
No recovery groups in cynomolgus monkey repeat-dose studies; recovery only in one 13-week rat study
“Recovery groups were included in one of the 13- week rat studies but unfortunately not in Cynomolgus monkeys.”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 43Source ↗
DARTAcceptedBeyond the letter
No dedicated male fertility study; male reproductive organs assessed in repeat-dose toxicity study
Why: Repeat-dose reproductive organ findings only at high exposure (margin 80; safety factor 56 at NOAEL), indicating low male fertility risk · Weight of evidence
“No dedicated male fertility study was conducted. Instead, male reproductive organs were assessed in a repeated dose toxicity study, which is acceptable.”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 35Source ↗
“These effects occurred at a dose resulting in an exposure margin of 80, with a safety factor of 56 at the NOAEL, when unbound exposure is compared to human exposure.”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 35Source ↗

Similar precedents