Safety marginVerdict not stated
No margin at 39-week monkey NOAEL: females below 1x and males 1x MRHD AUC
“The NOAEL for females was the low-dose of 30 mg/kg/day, with AUC(0-24) = 3000 µg.h/L (<1 X MRHD) and the NOAEL for males was the high-dose of 80 mg/kg/day, with AUC(0-24) = 8370 µg.h/L (1 X MRHD).”
✓ VerifiedFDA integrated review, p. 457Source ↗ Safety marginVerdict not stated
No margin at the rat pre- and postnatal developmental NOAEL (0.23x MRHD AUC)
“2) At the NOAEL of 1.5 mg/kg/day for developmental toxicity there is no safety margin (0.23 X) based on AUC0-24h of 8572 ng•h/mL (Elinzanetant) obtained from clinical study B002427.”
✓ VerifiedFDA integrated review, p. 598Source ↗ Impurity or metaboliteAcceptedBeyond the letter
2-year rat carcinogenicity study gave very low exposure margins to main metabolites M27 and M18/21
Why: Executive CAC agreed metabolite coverage in the rat carcinogenicity study is adequate · Other reason
“While the carcinogenicity study generated adequate clinical exposure margins for the parent drug and its primary metabolite (M30/34) in rats, it provided very low exposure margins to the other two main metabolites (M27 and M18/21).”
✓ VerifiedFDA integrated review, p. 646Source ↗ “1. The Exec CAC agreed metabolite coverage in rat carcinogenicity study is adequate.”
✓ VerifiedFDA integrated review, p. 638Source ↗ RecoveryQuestioned
No recovery groups in cynomolgus monkey repeat-dose studies; recovery only in one 13-week rat study
“Recovery groups were included in one of the 13- week rat studies but unfortunately not in Cynomolgus monkeys.”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 43Source ↗ DARTAcceptedBeyond the letter
No dedicated male fertility study; male reproductive organs assessed in repeat-dose toxicity study
Why: Repeat-dose reproductive organ findings only at high exposure (margin 80; safety factor 56 at NOAEL), indicating low male fertility risk · Weight of evidence
“No dedicated male fertility study was conducted. Instead, male reproductive organs were assessed in a repeated dose toxicity study, which is acceptable.”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 35Source ↗ “These effects occurred at a dose resulting in an exposure margin of 80, with a safety factor of 56 at the NOAEL, when unbound exposure is compared to human exposure.”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 35Source ↗