SpeciesAccepted
Chronic (13-week) toxicity in rat only; monkey limited to 4 weeks
Why: Comparable rat and monkey toxicity profiles; equivalent binding affinity to human Nectin-4 in both species · Within the guideline · Weight of evidence
“In general, similar toxicity profiles were observed across species and therefore only the rat was studied in the chronic (13-week) repeat dose toxicity study (please refer to ICH S6, S9, S9 Q&A).”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 49Source ↗ “As the toxicity profiles seem to be comparable between rat and cynomolgus, and considering that cross-reactivity in the rat and cynomolgus monkey have equivalent binding affinity to human Nectin-4, it is acceptable to conduct the chronic (13-week) repeat dose toxicity study only in the rat.”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 66Source ↗ DARTAccepted
No fertility/early embryonic or pre- and postnatal development studies; male fertility risk from repeat-dose testicular findings
Why: ICH S9: advanced cancer population · Within the guideline · Serious disease
“Dedicated fertility and early embryonic development studies were not conducted in accordance with ICH S9.”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 55Source ↗ “Fertility and early embryonic development studies were not conducted or needed to support marketing of PADCEV in patients with advanced cancer.”
✓ VerifiedFDA multi-discipline review, p. 85Source ↗ DARTAcceptedBeyond the letter
ADC tested only in a preliminary rat EFD study; definitive EFD run with MMAE and another MMAE ADC (SGN-35)
Why: Embryo-fetal toxicity judged appropriately evaluated; findings reported in the SmPC · Class precedent
“Embryo-fetal development toxicity of SGN-35 and SGD-1010 was evaluated in a GLP-compliant repeat-dose IV embryo-fetal development study in pregnant rats.”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 67Source ↗ “The embryo-fetal toxicity was appropriately evaluated and the observed findings are correctly reported in the SmPC.”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 67Source ↗ OtherAccepted
No separate local tolerance studies
Why: ICH S6 · Within the guideline
“Separate studies evaluating local tolerance of enfortumab vedotin were not performed. In accordance with ICH S6, the omission of dedicated local tolerance studies is acceptable.”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 67Source ↗