SpeciesAcceptedBeyond the letter
No pharmacologically relevant species; CD19-mediated toxicity could not be evaluated in any nonclinical species
Why: Considerable nonclinical and clinical safety data exist for CD19- and CD20-specific B-cell-depleting agents · No relevant species · Class precedent · Human data
“Importantly, on‐target (ie, CD19‐mediated) toxicity cannot be evaluated in this or any other nonclinical species; however, a considerable body of data on the nonclinical and clinical safety of CD19‐ and CD20‐specific B‐cell‐depleting agents exists.”
✓ VerifiedFDA multi-discipline review, p. 49Source ↗ “FDA generally concurs with the Applicant’s assessment.”
✓ VerifiedFDA multi-discipline review, p. 50Source ↗ DARTVerdict not stated
No reproductive and developmental toxicity studies
Why: Genotoxic cytotoxic drug expected to be embryo-fetal toxic and teratogenic · Pharmacology or kinetics
“Reproductive and developmental toxicology studies were not conducted since cytotoxic (i.e. genotoxic) drugs that affect actively dividing cells, such as loncastuximab tesirine, are expected to be embryo/feto toxic and teratogenic.”
✓ VerifiedFDA multi-discipline review, p. 39Source ↗ GLPCriticised but acceptedBeyond the letter
GLP deviation in a monkey study: formulation analyses out of range with an unvalidated analytical method
Why: Dose-related toxicities indicate correct dosing · Weight of evidence
“Study No. 8374716: Some of the analysed concentrations for formulations were out of range (below LOD), therefore not valid and the analytical method used for those analysis was not validated. The applicant was requested to justify why those deviations to GLP do not jeopardise the validity of the study.”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 35Source ↗ “Dose-related effects such as skin effects, nephropathy and testicular changes were observed in toxicology studies. These results indicate the correct dosage.”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 35Source ↗