Nonclinical precedent Request an invite
Flexibility accepted
SpeciesAcceptedBeyond the letter
No pharmacologically relevant species; CD19-mediated toxicity could not be evaluated in any nonclinical species
Why: Considerable nonclinical and clinical safety data exist for CD19- and CD20-specific B-cell-depleting agents · No relevant species · Class precedent · Human data
“Importantly, on‐target (ie, CD19‐mediated) toxicity cannot be evaluated in this or any other nonclinical species; however, a considerable body of data on the nonclinical and clinical safety of CD19‐ and CD20‐specific B‐cell‐depleting agents exists.”
✓ VerifiedFDA multi-discipline review, p. 49Source ↗
“FDA generally concurs with the Applicant’s assessment.”
✓ VerifiedFDA multi-discipline review, p. 50Source ↗
DARTVerdict not stated
No reproductive and developmental toxicity studies
Why: Genotoxic cytotoxic drug expected to be embryo-fetal toxic and teratogenic · Pharmacology or kinetics
“Reproductive and developmental toxicology studies were not conducted since cytotoxic (i.e. genotoxic) drugs that affect actively dividing cells, such as loncastuximab tesirine, are expected to be embryo/feto toxic and teratogenic.”
✓ VerifiedFDA multi-discipline review, p. 39Source ↗
GLPCriticised but acceptedBeyond the letter
GLP deviation in a monkey study: formulation analyses out of range with an unvalidated analytical method
Why: Dose-related toxicities indicate correct dosing · Weight of evidence
“Study No. 8374716: Some of the analysed concentrations for formulations were out of range (below LOD), therefore not valid and the analytical method used for those analysis was not validated. The applicant was requested to justify why those deviations to GLP do not jeopardise the validity of the study.”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 35Source ↗
“Dose-related effects such as skin effects, nephropathy and testicular changes were observed in toxicology studies. These results indicate the correct dosage.”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 35Source ↗

Same question, other ADCs

Adcetris

brentuximab vedotin · CD30
Exposure ratios derived from single-dose studies and a different dosing scheme rather than repeat-dose data matching the clinical regimen

Besponsa

inotuzumab ozogamicin · CD22
No pharmacologically relevant toxicology species: antibody does not bind rat or monkey CD22, so only target-independent payload toxicity assessed

Datroway

datopotamab deruxtecan · Trop-2
No fertility, embryo-fetal or pre- and postnatal development studies; fertility assessed from repeat-dose studies

Decnupaz

pivekimab sunirine · CD123
No pharmacologically relevant toxicology species: no CD123 cross-reactivity in mouse, rat or cynomolgus monkey; monkey studies assess off-target and payload toxicity only

Elahere

mirvetuximab soravtansine · FRα
No reproductive or developmental toxicity studies at all, including embryo-fetal development

Emrelis

telisotuzumab vedotin · c-Met
No fertility, embryo-fetal or pre/postnatal development studies with the ADC; MMAE payload EFD data relied on

Enhertu

fam-trastuzumab deruxtecan · HER2
No embryo-fetal development or other reproductive toxicity studies with the ADC

Kadcyla

ado-trastuzumab emtansine · HER2
No embryo-fetal development studies with the ADC

Mylotarg

gemtuzumab ozogamicin · CD33
No pharmacologically relevant species: antibody does not bind monkey CD33 or rat and monkey tissues; toxicity studies address off-target effects only

Padcev

enfortumab vedotin · Nectin-4
Chronic (13-week) toxicity in rat only; monkey limited to 4 weeks

Polivy

polatuzumab vedotin · CD79b
Polatuzumab does not bind monkey CD79b; target-mediated toxicity assessed with a surrogate ADC binding monkey CD79b

Tivdak

tisotumab vedotin · Tissue factor
No embryo-fetal development study with the ADC; rat EFD study of the MMAE payload (from brentuximab vedotin) relied on

Trodelvy

sacituzumab govitecan · Trop-2
No embryo-fetal development or fertility studies; genotoxic SN-38 payload assumed teratogenic

Summary across all 14 ADCs →