CarcinogenicityAccepted
No genotoxicity or carcinogenicity studies with the vaccine (MPL adjuvant genotoxicity tested only)
Why: L1 protein vaccine without HPV oncoproteins; not usually required for recombinant protein vaccines (WHO) · Within the guideline · Low-risk modality
“The mutagenic and carcinogenic potential of the Cervarix vaccine was not further evaluated, which is accepted since the vaccine is based on L1 protein and HPV oncoproteins are absent.”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 53Source ↗ “The genotoxic and oncogenic potential of Cervarix were not evaluated. Such studies are not usually required for recombinant protein vaccines, consistent with WHO guidelines on vaccine nonclinical safety evaluation.”
✓ VerifiedFDA toxicology review, p. 4Source ↗ OtherCriticised but acceptedBeyond the letter
MPL-alone repeat-dose toxicity only from short intravenous studies done before Cervarix development, not by the intramuscular clinical route
Why: MPL adsorbed to aluminium has an acceptable safety margin at the proposed dose, route and regimen · Pharmacology or kinetics
“While the repeat-dose toxicity studies of MPL were performed following intravenous administrations of MPL, they can be viewed as providing limited supportive toxicity information for administration of MPL via the intramuscular (IM) route of administration intended for Cervarix.”
✓ VerifiedFDA pharmacology/toxicology review, p. 3Source ↗ “Overall, these data indicate that MPL adsorbed to aluminum hydroxide, as it exists in Cervarix, the product described in Biologics License Application (BLA) STN 125259, is suitable as a human vaccine adjuvant at the proposed dosage and formulation, as it appears to have an acceptable safety margin, especially when administered by the proposed route of administration and dosing regimen.”
✓ VerifiedFDA pharmacology/toxicology review, p. 4Source ↗ DARTVerdict not stated
Ventricular septal defects in rat vaccine/AS04 DART and rabbit MPL studies above historical controls; treatment relation unclear
Why: Sponsor attributes defects to spontaneous delay in normal development
“However, concerning is that the incidence of ventricular septal defect in both studies is higher than in the historical control and did not occur in concurrent control groups.”
✓ VerifiedFDA toxicology review, p. 40Source ↗ “Sponsor concludes that the incidence of IVSD in rats and rabbits in studies -b(4)-249 and --b(4)-- 1729/8 is of spontaneous nature. Sponsor attributes the occurrence of membranous intraventricular septal defects to a delay in normal development that will close with further normal development.”
✓ VerifiedFDA toxicology review, p. 40Source ↗