OtherAcceptedBeyond the letter
No dedicated nonclinical studies with HBVaxPro; data extrapolated from HEXAVAC, PROCOMVAX and the thiomersal-containing vaccine
Why: Separate studies would not provide new knowledge on the preclinical safety profile · Class precedent · Weight of evidence
“Pre-clinical data are considered to be sufficent. The data from the HEXAVAC and PROCOMVAX studies can be extrapolated to the monovalent, thiomersal-free hepatitis B vaccine. Separate studies would not provide any new knowledge on the pre-clinical safety profile of HBVAXPRO.”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 4Source ↗ Study lengthAcceptedBeyond the letter
Rat repeat-dose study omitted the fourth (booster) dose of the human schedule
Why: Second and third injections sufficient to boost the immune response and reveal adverse reactions · Pharmacology or kinetics
“The fourth dose which was administered 6 months to 1 year after the third dose in the human vaccination scheme for HEXAVAC® was not included in this toxicology study design. However, it is considered that the second and the third injections were sufficient to boost the immune response and to reveal potential adverse reactions.”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 4Source ↗ OtherAcceptedBeyond the letter
Repeat-dose toxicity given subcutaneously rather than by the intramuscular clinical route
Why: Subcutaneous route considered equivalent in bioavailability to the intramuscular route · Pharmacology or kinetics
“The subcutaneous route was considered equivalent in terms of bioavailability to the intramuscular clinical route and a dose level of 5 human doses per kg was tested (human dose level: 0.17 human dose/kg of human body weight).”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 4Source ↗ DARTVerdict not stated
No animal reproduction studies
“Animal reproduction studies have not been conducted. This information has been included in the SPC.”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 9Source ↗