Nonclinical precedent Request an invite

Cinqair

reslizumab
monoclonal antibodyIL-5Humanized IgG4-kappa anti-IL-5 monoclonal antibodySevere eosinophilic asthma, add-on maintenance
Species
MonkeyMouse
Longest study
26 wk
Genotox
Conducted Conducted
Carcinogenicity
Conducted Conducted
Repro
Conducted Conducted
First dose
Partial / alternative Partly stated

Speciesopen answer page →

Species
Mouse and cynomolgus monkey
“Pivotal nonclinical studies were conducted in CD-1 mice and Cynomolgus monkeys; both were identified as relevant species in a series of pharmacology studies.”
✓ VerifiedFDA pharmacology/toxicology review, p. 2Source ↗
Why that species
Similar binding affinity to human, monkey and mouse IL-5 (KD 24, 20 and 31 pM)
“Reslizumab binds with similar affinity to human, monkey, and mouse IL-5 (KD = 24, 20, and 31 pM; respectively, as determined by BIAcore biosensor assays).”
✓ VerifiedFDA pharmacology/toxicology review, p. 30Source ↗
Surrogate molecule
No surrogate; the clinical antibody was tested in mice, rabbits and cynomolgus monkeys
“The nonclinical program for reslizumab included studies conducted in mice, rabbits, and monkeys, which were all considered pharmacologically relevant species based on data from in vivo eosinophilia models in sensitized animals”
✓ VerifiedFDA pharmacology/toxicology review, p. 30Source ↗
Species: general tox
CD-1 mouse and cynomolgus monkey
“The nonclinical general toxicology program with reslizumab was conducted in CD-1 mice and Cynomolgus monkeys, both of which were determined to be pharmacologically relevant test species.”
✓ VerifiedFDA pharmacology/toxicology review, p. 21Source ↗
Species: DART
CD-1 mouse (fertility, EFD, pre/postnatal) and New Zealand rabbit (EFD)
“Reproductive and developmental toxicology studies were conducted in CD-1 mice (fertility, embryo-fetal development, and pre-natal/post-natal development) and New Zealand rabbits (embryo-fetal development).”
✓ VerifiedFDA pharmacology/toxicology review, p. 30Source ↗
Species: carcinogenicity
Tg.rasH2 transgenic mouse (26-week)
“The applicant conducted a 26-week study in Tg.rasH2 mice to assess the carcinogenic potential of reslizumab.”
✓ VerifiedFDA pharmacology/toxicology review, p. 59Source ↗
Surrogate used in
No surrogate used; clinical antibody tested in mice, rabbits and monkeys as relevant species
“The nonclinical program for reslizumab included studies conducted in mice, rabbits, and monkeys, which were all considered pharmacologically relevant species based on data from in vivo eosinophilia models in sensitized animals”
✓ VerifiedFDA pharmacology/toxicology review, p. 30Source ↗

Study lengthopen answer page →

Longest pivotal study
26 weeks
“In toxicology studies up to 6 months duration, no target organs of toxicity were identified in either mice or monkeys at an IV dose up to 25 mg/kg once every 4 weeks.”
✓ VerifiedFDA pharmacology/toxicology review, p. 2Source ↗
Pivotal GLP studies
6-month IV studies in mice and cynomolgus monkeys, up to 25 mg/kg once every 4 weeks
“In toxicology studies up to 6 months duration, no target organs of toxicity were identified in either mice or monkeys at an IV dose up to 25 mg/kg once every 4 weeks.”
✓ VerifiedFDA pharmacology/toxicology review, p. 2Source ↗
Route in tox
IV
“Repeat-dose GLP toxicology studies were conducted in CD-1 mice, CByB6F1- Tg(HRAS)2Jic mice, and cynomolgus monkeys using the IV route of administration.”
✓ VerifiedFDA pharmacology/toxicology review, p. 48Source ↗

Skipped studiesopen answer page →

Genotoxicity
Not applicable for a protein; Ames and in vitro chromosomal aberration assays negative
“Genetic toxicity studies were not applicable for this therapeutic biologic protein though reslizumab was negative in two in vitro assays.”
✓ VerifiedFDA pharmacology/toxicology review, p. 2Source ↗
Carcinogenicity
Tg.rasH2 transgenic mouse study up to 500 mg/kg IV every two weeks: no drug-related neoplasms
“A transgenic mouse (Tg.rasH2) carcinogenicity study was conducted with dose concurrence by the Executive Carcinogenicity Assessment Committee (ECAC). No drug-related neoplasms were found after dosing up to 500 mg/kg IV once every two weeks.”
✓ VerifiedFDA pharmacology/toxicology review, p. 2Source ↗
Reproductive & developmental
No effects on fertility or development up to 50 mg/kg IV; about 6-fold exposure margin in mouse studies
“No effects on fertility or development parameters were identified at doses up to 50 mg/kg IV; exposure margins of approximately 6-fold were available in the mouse studies.”
✓ VerifiedFDA pharmacology/toxicology review, p. 3Source ↗
Safety pharmacology
Rat and monkey studies at 100 and 25 mg/kg: no cardiovascular, CNS or gastrointestinal effects
“Reslizumab administered iv at a dose of 100 mg/kg (600 mg/m2) to rats (DS-2014-080) and 25 mg/kg (300 mg/m2) to monkeys (SN96333) did not elicit effects on the most important parameters related to organ functions (cardiovascular, CNS, or gastrointestinal).”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 20Source ↗
Genotox: Ames
Negative (bacterial mutagenicity Ames assay)
“Reslizumab tested negative in a bacterial mutagenicity (Ames) assay and a chromosomal aberration assay in cultured human lymphocytes.”
✓ VerifiedFDA pharmacology/toxicology review, p. 181Source ↗
Genotox: in vitro mammalian
Chromosomal aberration in cultured human lymphocytes: negative
“Reslizumab tested negative in a bacterial mutagenicity (Ames) assay and a chromosomal aberration assay in cultured human lymphocytes.”
✓ VerifiedFDA pharmacology/toxicology review, p. 181Source ↗
Genotox: in vivo
Not conducted; genetic toxicity studies not applicable for a therapeutic protein
“Genetic toxicity studies were not applicable for this therapeutic biologic protein though reslizumab was negative in two in vitro assays.”
✓ VerifiedFDA pharmacology/toxicology review, p. 2Source ↗
Carcinogenicity model
Tg.rasH2 mouse, 26 weeks, up to 500 mg/kg IV every two weeks; no drug-related neoplasms
“A transgenic mouse (Tg.rasH2) carcinogenicity study was conducted with dose concurrence by the Executive Carcinogenicity Assessment Committee (ECAC). No drug-related neoplasms were found after dosing up to 500 mg/kg IV once every two weeks.”
✓ VerifiedFDA pharmacology/toxicology review, p. 2Source ↗
Carcinogenicity timing
6-month Tg.rasH2 (HRAS transgenic) mouse study completed before the marketing application
“Carcinogenicity: A 6-month carcinogenicity study was conducted in HRAS transgenic mice, a confirmed pharmacologically relevant mouse strain.”
✓ VerifiedFDA pharmacology/toxicology review, p. 22Source ↗
hERG / QT
No hERG assay; no cardiovascular, CNS or GI effects in rat (100 mg/kg) and monkey (25 mg/kg) safety pharmacology
“Reslizumab administered iv at a dose of 100 mg/kg (600 mg/m2) to rats (DS-2014-080) and 25 mg/kg (300 mg/m2) to monkeys (SN96333) did not elicit effects on the most important parameters related to organ functions (cardiovascular, CNS, or gastrointestinal).”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 20Source ↗

First doseopen answer page →

First-in-human starting dose
Phase 1 single-dose escalation in severe asthma at 0.03 to 1.0 mg/kg; derivation of starting dose not described
“This product has been used in Europe in an initial phase 1 single dose, dose escalation trial for treatment of 32 subjects with severe asthma (I96-350). Doses ranged from 0.03 mg/kg to 1.0 mg/kg.”
✓ VerifiedFDA pharmacology/toxicology review, p. 125Source ↗
NOAEL / key findings
NOAEL 25 mg/kg (highest dose) in mice and monkeys; no target organs; about 3-fold exposure margin
“The NOAELs of 25 mg/kg provided a safety margin of approximately 3-fold compared to the recommended clinical dose based on systemic exposure comparisons.”
✓ VerifiedFDA pharmacology/toxicology review, p. 2Source ↗

Risksopen answer page →

Immune & cytokine safety
ADA in 3 monkeys in pivotal study; one at 25 mg/kg had repeated hypersensitivity-type infusion reactions
“Immunogenicity noted in 3 animals in the pivotal toxicity study (1 at 5 mg/kg, 2 at 25 mg/kg); 1 of the 25 mg/kg animals had repeated infusion reactions c/w hypersensitivity”
✓ VerifiedFDA pharmacology/toxicology review, p. 126Source ↗
Biodistribution & persistence
Human TCR binding only in spinal cord, brain and optic nerve; no binding in other tissues
“In human tissue, binding was observed in spinal cord, brain and optic nerve. No binding was seen to peripheral nerves, or any other human tissue examined.”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 19Source ↗
Modality-specific risk
Lack of eosinophil recovery, parasitic infection risk, CNS toxicity from tissue binding, hypersensitivity
“Lack of recovery of eosinophils, increased risk of parasitic infections, nonspecific CNS toxicity due to potential tissue binding, hypersensitivity responses.”
✓ VerifiedFDA pharmacology/toxicology review, p. 125Source ↗
Anti-drug antibodies: animals
ADA in all nonclinical species; neutralizing, with reslizumab undetectable in ADA-positive animals
“There was evidence of ADA formation in all nonclinical species tested. Analysis of PK parameters in ADA-positive animals found that the antibodies were neutralizing, as reslizumab was not detected in the blood of these animals.”
✓ VerifiedFDA pharmacology/toxicology review, p. 95Source ↗
Anti-drug antibodies: patients
5.4% (53/983) in placebo-controlled studies; low titer, often transient; neutralizing not evaluated
“In placebo-controlled studies, a treatment-emergent anti-reslizumab antibody response developed in 53/983 (5.4%) of CINQAIR-treated patients (3 mg/kg).”
✓ VerifiedUS prescribing informationSource ↗
Label warnings
Boxed warning: Anaphylaxis
  • Anaphylaxis
  • Acute Asthma Symptoms or Deteriorating Disease
  • Malignancy
  • Reduction of Corticosteroid Dosage
  • Parasitic (Helminth) Infection
Hypersensitivity & infusion reactionsSecondary malignancyInfections
US prescribing information, Boxed Warning and Warnings and PrecautionsDailyMed ↗

Tox packageopen answer page →

Before first-in-human

First-in-human: where
Europe: single-dose escalation in 32 patients with severe asthma
“This product has been used in Europe in an initial phase 1 single dose, dose escalation trial for treatment of 32 subjects with severe asthma (I96-350).”
✓ VerifiedFDA pharmacology/toxicology review, p. 125Source ↗
Repeat-dose tox before first-in-human
Not stated in public reviews
Not reported in the public reviews. Reviewers summarise selectively, so this usually means it wasn't discussed publicly, not that it wasn't studied.
First-in-human starting dose
Phase 1 single-dose escalation in severe asthma at 0.03 to 1.0 mg/kg; derivation of starting dose not described
“This product has been used in Europe in an initial phase 1 single dose, dose escalation trial for treatment of 32 subjects with severe asthma (I96-350). Doses ranged from 0.03 mg/kg to 1.0 mg/kg.”
✓ VerifiedFDA pharmacology/toxicology review, p. 125Source ↗

Longest repeat-dose systemic studies

Longest repeat-dose study and recovery
6-month IV studies in cynomolgus monkey (with 3-month recovery) and mouse
“Standard toxicological evaluations were conducted after intravenous administration of 0, 1, 5, 25 mg/kg in monkeys every 4-weeks for 6-months (total of 7 doses) with 3-month recovery period. A similar dosing schedule of 28-days for a total of 7 doses was used for administration of 0, 2, 5, 25 mg/kg reslizumab in mice.”
✓ VerifiedFDA pharmacology/toxicology review, p. 120Source ↗
Pivotal GLP studies
6-month IV studies in mice and cynomolgus monkeys, up to 25 mg/kg once every 4 weeks
“In toxicology studies up to 6 months duration, no target organs of toxicity were identified in either mice or monkeys at an IV dose up to 25 mg/kg once every 4 weeks.”
✓ VerifiedFDA pharmacology/toxicology review, p. 2Source ↗

DART package

Species: DART
CD-1 mouse (fertility, EFD, pre/postnatal) and New Zealand rabbit (EFD)
“Reproductive and developmental toxicology studies were conducted in CD-1 mice (fertility, embryo-fetal development, and pre-natal/post-natal development) and New Zealand rabbits (embryo-fetal development).”
✓ VerifiedFDA pharmacology/toxicology review, p. 30Source ↗
Reproductive & developmental
No effects on fertility or development up to 50 mg/kg IV; about 6-fold exposure margin in mouse studies
“No effects on fertility or development parameters were identified at doses up to 50 mg/kg IV; exposure margins of approximately 6-fold were available in the mouse studies.”
✓ VerifiedFDA pharmacology/toxicology review, p. 3Source ↗
PPND / ePPND: when
PPND in CD-1 mouse completed before the marketing application
“Reproductive and developmental toxicology studies were conducted in CD-1 mice (fertility, embryo-fetal development, and pre-natal/post-natal development) and New Zealand rabbits (embryo-fetal development).”
✓ VerifiedFDA pharmacology/toxicology review, p. 30Source ↗

Carcinogenicity

Species: carcinogenicity
Tg.rasH2 transgenic mouse (26-week)
“The applicant conducted a 26-week study in Tg.rasH2 mice to assess the carcinogenic potential of reslizumab.”
✓ VerifiedFDA pharmacology/toxicology review, p. 59Source ↗
Carcinogenicity model
Tg.rasH2 mouse, 26 weeks, up to 500 mg/kg IV every two weeks; no drug-related neoplasms
“A transgenic mouse (Tg.rasH2) carcinogenicity study was conducted with dose concurrence by the Executive Carcinogenicity Assessment Committee (ECAC). No drug-related neoplasms were found after dosing up to 500 mg/kg IV once every two weeks.”
✓ VerifiedFDA pharmacology/toxicology review, p. 2Source ↗
Carcinogenicity timing
6-month Tg.rasH2 (HRAS transgenic) mouse study completed before the marketing application
“Carcinogenicity: A 6-month carcinogenicity study was conducted in HRAS transgenic mice, a confirmed pharmacologically relevant mouse strain.”
✓ VerifiedFDA pharmacology/toxicology review, p. 22Source ↗

Safety marginopen answer page →

Safety margin at NOAEL
Mouse and monkey NOAEL ~3-fold human AUC at 3 mg/kg IV q4w
“This NOAEL also provides adequate safety margin (3-fold on an AUC basis) for the proposed clinical dose of 3 mg/kg IV q4 weeks.”
✓ VerifiedFDA pharmacology/toxicology review, p. 22Source ↗
NOAEL / key findings
NOAEL 25 mg/kg (highest dose) in mice and monkeys; no target organs; about 3-fold exposure margin
“The NOAELs of 25 mg/kg provided a safety margin of approximately 3-fold compared to the recommended clinical dose based on systemic exposure comparisons.”
✓ VerifiedFDA pharmacology/toxicology review, p. 2Source ↗

Efficacy evidenceopen answer page →

Efficacy evidence
Allergen-challenge eosinophilia models: OVA-sensitized mice and guinea pigs, Ascaris-challenged monkeys, antigen-challenged rabbits
“Treatment with reslizumab decreased pulmonary eosinophilia after ovalbumin challenge in mice and guinea pigs, as well as in Ascaris-challenged monkeys. Reslizumab also reduced eosinophil influx into the skin of antigen challenged New Zealand rabbits.”
✓ VerifiedFDA pharmacology/toxicology review, p. 21Source ↗
Why that model
Reslizumab binds human, monkey and mouse IL-5 with similar affinity, allowing testing of the clinical antibody in animals
“Reslizumab binds with similar affinity to human, monkey, and mouse IL-5 (KD = 24, 20, and 31 pM; respectively, as determined by BIAcore biosensor assays).”
✓ VerifiedFDA pharmacology/toxicology review, p. 30Source ↗
Reviewer's view of the efficacy data
EMA: asthma models support therapeutic potential, but effect on circulating eosinophils not investigated in pharmacology studies
“Testing of reslizumab in different animal models on asthma supports a therapeutic potential for reslizumab in airway eosinophilic conditions. It is however noted that the effect of reslizumab on eosinophils in circulation has not been investigated in any of the non-clinical pharmacology studies included in the dossier.”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 28Source ↗

Flexibilityopen answer page →

Flexibility accepted
DARTCriticised but acceptedBeyond the letter
Mouse and rabbit embryo-fetal studies without toxicokinetic data or demonstrated pharmacological effect
Why: Systemic exposure assumed after IV dosing; mouse maternal exposure extrapolated from other studies · Pharmacology or kinetics
“In the embryo-foetal development studies in CD-1 mouse and NZW rabbit, toxicokinetic data were not collected, and a pharmacological effect has not been demonstrated.”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 30Source ↗
“Maternal exposure data for mouse can be extrapolated from other studies. The limited PK-information from rabbit is considered a deficiency, but not essential for assessment since systemic exposure is assumed after iv administration.”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 30Source ↗
Safety pharmacologyCriticised but acceptedBeyond the letter
Dedicated safety pharmacology studies done in rats, a species not shown to be pharmacologically relevant
Why: No findings of concern in behaviour, cardiovascular or respiratory parameters in pivotal mouse and monkey toxicity studies · Weight of evidence
“Although no significant drug-related effects were observed, the biological significance of these data is limited as the rat was not tested in”
✓ VerifiedFDA pharmacology/toxicology review, p. 94Source ↗
“Of note, no findings of concern were observed in behavior, cardiovascular parameters, or respiratory parameters in the pivotal toxicity studies conducted in CD-1 mice or cynomolgus monkeys (relevant nonclinical species).”
✓ VerifiedFDA pharmacology/toxicology review, p. 95Source ↗
CarcinogenicityAcceptedBeyond the letter
Carcinogenicity study exposure margin extrapolated from a different toxicology study rather than measured in the study
Why: Margin of at least 50 over the clinical dose extrapolated from another study · Pharmacology or kinetics
“At the high dose level a safety margin of at least 50 compared to the clinical dose (3 mg/kg) can be extrapolated from a different toxicology study, which is considered acceptable by CHMP.”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 30Source ↗

Similar precedents