DARTCriticised but acceptedBeyond the letter
Mouse and rabbit embryo-fetal studies without toxicokinetic data or demonstrated pharmacological effect
Why: Systemic exposure assumed after IV dosing; mouse maternal exposure extrapolated from other studies · Pharmacology or kinetics
“In the embryo-foetal development studies in CD-1 mouse and NZW rabbit, toxicokinetic data were not collected, and a pharmacological effect has not been demonstrated.”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 30Source ↗ “Maternal exposure data for mouse can be extrapolated from other studies. The limited PK-information from rabbit is considered a deficiency, but not essential for assessment since systemic exposure is assumed after iv administration.”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 30Source ↗ Safety pharmacologyCriticised but acceptedBeyond the letter
Dedicated safety pharmacology studies done in rats, a species not shown to be pharmacologically relevant
Why: No findings of concern in behaviour, cardiovascular or respiratory parameters in pivotal mouse and monkey toxicity studies · Weight of evidence
“Although no significant drug-related effects were observed, the biological significance of these data is limited as the rat was not tested in”
✓ VerifiedFDA pharmacology/toxicology review, p. 94Source ↗ “Of note, no findings of concern were observed in behavior, cardiovascular parameters, or respiratory parameters in the pivotal toxicity studies conducted in CD-1 mice or cynomolgus monkeys (relevant nonclinical species).”
✓ VerifiedFDA pharmacology/toxicology review, p. 95Source ↗ CarcinogenicityAcceptedBeyond the letter
Carcinogenicity study exposure margin extrapolated from a different toxicology study rather than measured in the study
Why: Margin of at least 50 over the clinical dose extrapolated from another study · Pharmacology or kinetics
“At the high dose level a safety margin of at least 50 compared to the clinical dose (3 mg/kg) can be extrapolated from a different toxicology study, which is considered acceptable by CHMP.”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 30Source ↗