Nonclinical precedent Request an invite

Zynlonta

loncastuximab tesirine
ADCCD19Humanized IgG1κ anti-CD19 ADC with PBD dimer (SG3199) payload, DAR ~2.3Relapsed/refractory large B-cell lymphoma after two lines
Species
no relevantMonkeyRatDog
Longest study
13 wk
Genotox
Partial / alternative Partial / alternative
Carcinogenicity
Not conducted Not conducted
Repro
Not conducted Not conducted
First dose
Partial / alternative Partly stated

Speciesopen answer page →

Species
No pharmacologically relevant species; cynomolgus monkey (non-binding) for ADC; rat and dog for payload SG3199
“No pharmacologically relevant nonclinical species for safety evaluation—as defined in ICH S6(R1)—exists for loncastuximab tesirine, due its antibody component being selective for human CD19.”
✓ VerifiedFDA multi-discipline review, p. 49Source ↗
Why that species
Antibody not cross-reactive with any nonclinical CD19; monkey chosen for PK predictivity, lower ADA impact, and PBD class-toxicity translation
“The monoclonal antibody (mAb) component of loncastuximab tesirine, RB4v1.2, is selective for human CD19 and not cross‐reactive with CD19 from any nonclinical species.”
✓ VerifiedFDA multi-discipline review, p. 37Source ↗
Surrogate molecule
No surrogate; clinical ADC in non-binding monkey (off-target only), free payload SG3199 in rat and dog
“Importantly, on‐target (ie, CD19‐mediated) toxicity cannot be evaluated in this or any other nonclinical species; however, a considerable body of data on the nonclinical and clinical safety of CD19‐ and CD20‐specific B‐cell‐depleting agents exists.”
✓ VerifiedFDA multi-discipline review, p. 49Source ↗
Species: general tox
Cynomolgus monkey (ADC, 4- and 13-week, 12-week recovery)
“The Applicant conducted GLP 4‐week and 13‐week repeat‐dose general toxicology studies in which cynomolgus monkeys were dosed with the ADC, followed by a 12‐week recovery period.”
✓ VerifiedFDA multi-discipline review, p. 50Source ↗
Species: DART
Not conducted (genotoxic cytotoxic ADC expected to be embryo-fetal toxic and teratogenic)
“Reproductive and developmental toxicology studies were not conducted since cytotoxic (i.e. genotoxic) drugs that affect actively dividing cells, such as loncastuximab tesirine, are expected to be embryo/feto toxic and teratogenic.”
✓ VerifiedFDA multi-discipline review, p. 39Source ↗
Species: carcinogenicity
Not conducted (ICH S9; genotoxic payload, advanced cancer)
“In accordance with ICH S9, ICH S6(R1) and ICH S1A (Guideline on the Need for Carcinogenicity Studies of Pharmaceuticals) no carcinogenicity studies were conducted or are planned with ADCT-402 or SG3199 given the genotoxic mode of action of SG3199 (covalent DNA crosslinking/ alkylating agent) and the intended clinical use in patients with advanced cancer.”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 38Source ↗
Surrogate used in
No surrogate used; CD19-mediated toxicity could not be evaluated in any nonclinical species
“Importantly, on‐target (ie, CD19‐mediated) toxicity cannot be evaluated in this or any other nonclinical species; however, a considerable body of data on the nonclinical and clinical safety of CD19‐ and CD20‐specific B‐cell‐depleting agents exists.”
✓ VerifiedFDA multi-discipline review, p. 49Source ↗

Study lengthopen answer page →

Longest pivotal study
13 weeks
“The Applicant conducted GLP 4‐week and 13‐week repeat‐dose general toxicology studies in which cynomolgus monkeys were dosed with the ADC, followed by a 12‐week recovery period.”
✓ VerifiedFDA multi-discipline review, p. 50Source ↗
Pivotal GLP studies
GLP monkey 4-week (0.3, 0.6 mg/kg q3w) and 13-week (0.075-0.3 mg/kg q3w) IV, 12-week recovery; SG3199 4-week rat
“The Applicant conducted GLP 4‐week and 13‐week repeat‐dose general toxicology studies in which cynomolgus monkeys were dosed with the ADC, followed by a 12‐week recovery period.”
✓ VerifiedFDA multi-discipline review, p. 50Source ↗
Route in tox
IV (30-minute infusion; clinical route)
“All in vivo studies with ADCT-402 or SG3199 used the IV route of administration, the intended clinical route of administration”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 41Source ↗

Skipped studiesopen answer page →

Genotoxicity
Not conducted with ADC; SG3199 clastogenic in vitro (micronucleus, chromosome aberration); Ames not assessable (cytotoxicity)
“No genotoxicity studies were conducted with ADCT-402. SG3199 was genotoxic in GLP in vitro studies (in vitro micronucleus assay and the chromosome aberration assay in human lymphocytes from whole blood).”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 37Source ↗
Carcinogenicity
Not conducted (ICH S9; genotoxic payload, advanced cancer)
“In accordance with ICH S9, ICH S6(R1) and ICH S1A (Guideline on the Need for Carcinogenicity Studies of Pharmaceuticals) no carcinogenicity studies were conducted or are planned with ADCT-402 or SG3199”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 38Source ↗
Reproductive & developmental
Not conducted (ICH S9); irreversible testicular toxicity in monkey; fertility assessed in repeat-dose study
“Reproductive and developmental toxicology studies were not conducted since cytotoxic (i.e. genotoxic) drugs that affect actively dividing cells, such as loncastuximab tesirine, are expected to be embryo/feto toxic and teratogenic.”
✓ VerifiedFDA multi-discipline review, p. 39Source ↗
Safety pharmacology
Incorporated into 4- and 13-week monkey studies (ECG, BP, respiration, neurobehavior); no hERG
“Consistent with International Council for Harmonization (ICH) S6(R1), no stand‐alone safety pharmacology studies were conducted with loncastuximab tesirine, and safety pharmacology endpoints were evaluated as part of the GLP‐compliant 4‐ and/or 13‐week repeat‐dose toxicity studies in cynomolgus monkeys.”
✓ VerifiedFDA multi-discipline review, p. 45Source ↗
Genotox: Ames
SG3199: Ames not assessable (cytotoxic at all concentrations)
“A GLP bacterial reverse mutation assay (Ames test) was also conducted; however, mutagenicity could not be assessed due to cytotoxicity at all concentrations tested.”
✓ VerifiedFDA multi-discipline review, p. 39Source ↗
Genotox: in vitro mammalian
SG3199: positive (clastogenic) in in vitro micronucleus and chromosome aberration assays in human lymphocytes
“The payload, SG3199, was genotoxic in GLP in vitro studies (in vitro micronucleus assay and the chromosome aberration assay in human lymphocytes from whole blood).”
✓ VerifiedFDA multi-discipline review, p. 39Source ↗
Genotox: in vivo
Not conducted (SG3199 evaluated in in vitro assays only)
“Genotoxicity of SG3199 was evaluated in two in vitro assays in human lymphocytes, a micronucleus assay, and a chromosome aberration assay.”
✓ VerifiedFDA multi-discipline review, p. 62Source ↗
Carcinogenicity model
Not conducted (ICH S9; genotoxic payload, advanced cancer)
“In accordance with ICH S9, ICH S6(R1) and ICH S1A (Guideline on the Need for Carcinogenicity Studies of Pharmaceuticals) no carcinogenicity studies were conducted or are planned with ADCT-402 or SG3199 given the genotoxic mode of action of SG3199 (covalent DNA crosslinking/ alkylating agent) and the intended clinical use in patients with advanced cancer.”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 38Source ↗
Carcinogenicity timing
Not required: genotoxic payload, advanced cancer (ICH S9, S6(R1), S1A)
“In accordance with ICH S9, ICH S6(R1) and ICH S1A, no carcinogenicity studies were conducted with loncastuximab tesirine or SG3199 given the genotoxic mode of action of SG3199 (see Section 5.5.2) and the intended clinical use in patients with advanced cancer.”
✓ VerifiedFDA multi-discipline review, p. 63Source ↗
hERG / QT
No hERG assay; monkey ECG/cardiovascular changes not adverse or ADC-related
“No evaluation for hERG inhibition was submitted for the ADC or SG3199. There was large variability in the individual ECG data in monkeys, but overall any observed changes in cardiovascular parameters assessed as part of the GLP toxicology studies in monkeys were not considered adverse or ADC‐related.”
✓ VerifiedFDA multi-discipline review, p. 45Source ↗

First doseopen answer page →

First-in-human starting dose
1/6 HNSTD in cynomolgus monkey cited as rationale for species choice; actual FIH calculation not detailed
“The cynomolgus monkey was selected as nonclinical species for safety evaluation of loncastuximab tesirine, given the greater predictive value of PK data generated in this species for humans, potential for reduced impact of antidrug antibody (ADA) formation on drug exposure, and the proven utility of 1/6th highest non‐severely toxic dose (HNSTD) for setting clinical starting doses with ADCs.”
✓ VerifiedFDA multi-discipline review, p. 49Source ↗
NOAEL / key findings
No NOAEL stated; 13-week monkey kidney and testis findings at all doses (≥0.075 mg/kg); skin hyperpigmentation dose-limiting; bone marrow, lung
“Also, adverse findings in male reproductive organs were present at 0.6 mg/kg only in the 4‐week study and at all doses (≥ 0.075 mg/kg) in the 13‐week study.”
✓ VerifiedFDA multi-discipline review, p. 51Source ↗

Risksopen answer page →

Immune & cytokine safety
Pro-inflammatory responses (WBC, fibrinogen, multi-organ inflammation) typical of PBD ADCs; ADA in few monkeys
“Treatment of monkeys with loncastuximab tesirine resulted in pro‐inflammatory responses as indicated by increases in the white blood cells (WBCs) and/or differentials, increased fibrinogen, and histopathology observations (multi‐organ inflammation, particularly the lung, kidney, or injection site).”
✓ VerifiedFDA multi-discipline review, p. 39Source ↗
Biodistribution & persistence
ADC confined to plasma volume, t1/2 8-17 days, stable; [3H]-SG3199 rapid wide distribution, no brain/melanin uptake, biliary excretion
“There was no apparent distribution of SG3199 to melanin‐ containing tissues or the brain or spinal cord.”
✓ VerifiedFDA multi-discipline review, p. 38Source ↗
Modality-specific risk
PBD payload toxicities: skin hyperpigmentation (photoreactive), myelosuppression, nephropathy, testicular atrophy, effusions/edema, inflammation
“In repeat‐dose toxicity studies in cynomolgus monkeys, loncastuximab tesirine exhibited a safety profile consistent with SG3199‐mediated effects on the skin (epidermal hyperpigmentation with hyperplasia/hyperkeratosis), bone marrow (hypocellularity associated with regenerative anemia)”
✓ VerifiedFDA multi-discipline review, p. 49Source ↗
Anti-drug antibodies: animals
13-week monkey: ADA in 2 treated animals (Day 85) with notably lower ADC exposure; 5 of 7 positives were pretest
“Note: 5 of the 7 confirmed positive titers were taken from pretest (Day ‐6) samples and 2 of the 7 were from animals on Day 85 (one female each at 0.075 and 0.15 mg/kg). The exposure to conjugated ADCT‐402 was notably lower compared to the profiles of other animals in the respective dosing groups”
✓ VerifiedFDA multi-discipline review, p. 49Source ↗
Anti-drug antibodies: patients
0 of 134 patients ADA-positive (LOTIS-2)
“In LOTIS-2, 0 of 134 patients tested positive for antibodies against loncastuximab tesirine-lpyl after treatment.”
✓ VerifiedUS prescribing informationSource ↗
Label warnings
  • Effusion and Edema, Including Capillary Leak Syndrome
  • Myelosuppression
  • Infections
  • Hepatotoxicity, Including Drug-Induced Liver Injury
  • Cutaneous Reactions
  • Embryo-Fetal Toxicity
CytopeniasInfectionsHepatotoxicitySkin reactionsEmbryo-fetal toxicity
US prescribing information, Warnings and PrecautionsDailyMed ↗

Tox packageopen answer page →

Before first-in-human

First-in-human: where
Not stated in public reviews
Not reported in the public reviews. Reviewers summarise selectively, so this usually means it wasn't discussed publicly, not that it wasn't studied.
Repeat-dose tox before first-in-human
Not stated in public reviews
Not reported in the public reviews. Reviewers summarise selectively, so this usually means it wasn't discussed publicly, not that it wasn't studied.
First-in-human starting dose
1/6 HNSTD in cynomolgus monkey cited as rationale for species choice; actual FIH calculation not detailed
“The cynomolgus monkey was selected as nonclinical species for safety evaluation of loncastuximab tesirine, given the greater predictive value of PK data generated in this species for humans, potential for reduced impact of antidrug antibody (ADA) formation on drug exposure, and the proven utility of 1/6th highest non‐severely toxic dose (HNSTD) for setting clinical starting doses with ADCs.”
✓ VerifiedFDA multi-discipline review, p. 49Source ↗

Longest repeat-dose systemic studies

Longest repeat-dose study and recovery
13-week GLP cynomolgus monkey (ADC) with 12-week recovery
“The Applicant conducted GLP 4‐week and 13‐week repeat‐dose general toxicology studies in which cynomolgus monkeys were dosed with the ADC, followed by a 12‐week recovery period.”
✓ VerifiedFDA multi-discipline review, p. 50Source ↗
Pivotal GLP studies
GLP monkey 4-week (0.3, 0.6 mg/kg q3w) and 13-week (0.075-0.3 mg/kg q3w) IV, 12-week recovery; SG3199 4-week rat
“The Applicant conducted GLP 4‐week and 13‐week repeat‐dose general toxicology studies in which cynomolgus monkeys were dosed with the ADC, followed by a 12‐week recovery period.”
✓ VerifiedFDA multi-discipline review, p. 50Source ↗

DART package

Species: DART
Not conducted (genotoxic cytotoxic ADC expected to be embryo-fetal toxic and teratogenic)
“Reproductive and developmental toxicology studies were not conducted since cytotoxic (i.e. genotoxic) drugs that affect actively dividing cells, such as loncastuximab tesirine, are expected to be embryo/feto toxic and teratogenic.”
✓ VerifiedFDA multi-discipline review, p. 39Source ↗
Reproductive & developmental
Not conducted (ICH S9); irreversible testicular toxicity in monkey; fertility assessed in repeat-dose study
“Reproductive and developmental toxicology studies were not conducted since cytotoxic (i.e. genotoxic) drugs that affect actively dividing cells, such as loncastuximab tesirine, are expected to be embryo/feto toxic and teratogenic.”
✓ VerifiedFDA multi-discipline review, p. 39Source ↗
PPND / ePPND: when
No reproductive and developmental toxicity studies; genotoxic cytotoxic ADC expected to be embryo-fetal toxic and teratogenic
“Reproductive and developmental toxicology studies were not conducted since cytotoxic (i.e. genotoxic) drugs that affect actively dividing cells, such as loncastuximab tesirine, are expected to be embryo/feto toxic and teratogenic.”
✓ VerifiedFDA multi-discipline review, p. 39Source ↗

Carcinogenicity

Species: carcinogenicity
Not conducted (ICH S9; genotoxic payload, advanced cancer)
“In accordance with ICH S9, ICH S6(R1) and ICH S1A (Guideline on the Need for Carcinogenicity Studies of Pharmaceuticals) no carcinogenicity studies were conducted or are planned with ADCT-402 or SG3199 given the genotoxic mode of action of SG3199 (covalent DNA crosslinking/ alkylating agent) and the intended clinical use in patients with advanced cancer.”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 38Source ↗
Carcinogenicity model
Not conducted (ICH S9; genotoxic payload, advanced cancer)
“In accordance with ICH S9, ICH S6(R1) and ICH S1A (Guideline on the Need for Carcinogenicity Studies of Pharmaceuticals) no carcinogenicity studies were conducted or are planned with ADCT-402 or SG3199 given the genotoxic mode of action of SG3199 (covalent DNA crosslinking/ alkylating agent) and the intended clinical use in patients with advanced cancer.”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 38Source ↗
Carcinogenicity timing
Not required: genotoxic payload, advanced cancer (ICH S9, S6(R1), S1A)
“In accordance with ICH S9, ICH S6(R1) and ICH S1A, no carcinogenicity studies were conducted with loncastuximab tesirine or SG3199 given the genotoxic mode of action of SG3199 (see Section 5.5.2) and the intended clinical use in patients with advanced cancer.”
✓ VerifiedFDA multi-discipline review, p. 63Source ↗

Safety marginopen answer page →

Safety margin at NOAEL
Monkey 0.3 mg/kg ~3x human AUC at MRHD 0.15 mg/kg
“The dose of 0.3 mg/kg in animals results in an exposure (AUC) that is approximately 3 times the exposure at the maximum recommended human recommended dose [MRHD] of 0.15 mg/kg.”
✓ VerifiedFDA multi-discipline review, p. 39Source ↗
NOAEL / key findings
No NOAEL stated; 13-week monkey kidney and testis findings at all doses (≥0.075 mg/kg); skin hyperpigmentation dose-limiting; bone marrow, lung
“Also, adverse findings in male reproductive organs were present at 0.6 mg/kg only in the 4‐week study and at all doses (≥ 0.075 mg/kg) in the 13‐week study.”
✓ VerifiedFDA multi-discipline review, p. 51Source ↗

Efficacy evidenceopen answer page →

Efficacy evidence
CD19-positive human Burkitt lymphoma (Ramos, Daudi) and DLBCL (WSU-DLCL2) xenografts in immunodeficient mice
“The in vivo activity of ADCT‐402 was evaluated in immunodeficient mice subcutaneously (SC) xenografted with the CD19 positive human Ramos or Daudi Burkitt’s lymphoma cell lines or with the CD19 positive human DLBCL cell line, WSU‐DLCL2 (Study No. ADCT‐402_R_007_R).”
✓ VerifiedFDA multi-discipline review, p. 43Source ↗
Why that model
Antibody selective for human CD19; not cross-reactive with CD19 of any nonclinical species
“The monoclonal antibody (mAb) component of loncastuximab tesirine, RB4v1.2, is selective for human CD19 and not cross‐reactive with CD19 from any nonclinical species.”
✓ VerifiedFDA multi-discipline review, p. 37Source ↗
Reviewer's view of the efficacy data
EMA: studies in lymphoma/leukaemia patient-derived cell lines supported clinical testing; cancer cell lines accepted for ADCs
“The nonclinical studies conducted with ADCT-402 using a panel of cell lines derived from lymphoma and leukaemia patients have supported the clinical testing of loncastuximab tesirine in patients. Findings from these nonclinical studies support the use of cancer cell lines for nonclinical studies with ADCs.”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 40Source ↗

Flexibilityopen answer page →

Flexibility accepted
SpeciesAcceptedBeyond the letter
No pharmacologically relevant species; CD19-mediated toxicity could not be evaluated in any nonclinical species
Why: Considerable nonclinical and clinical safety data exist for CD19- and CD20-specific B-cell-depleting agents · No relevant species · Class precedent · Human data
“Importantly, on‐target (ie, CD19‐mediated) toxicity cannot be evaluated in this or any other nonclinical species; however, a considerable body of data on the nonclinical and clinical safety of CD19‐ and CD20‐specific B‐cell‐depleting agents exists.”
✓ VerifiedFDA multi-discipline review, p. 49Source ↗
“FDA generally concurs with the Applicant’s assessment.”
✓ VerifiedFDA multi-discipline review, p. 50Source ↗
DARTVerdict not stated
No reproductive and developmental toxicity studies
Why: Genotoxic cytotoxic drug expected to be embryo-fetal toxic and teratogenic · Pharmacology or kinetics
“Reproductive and developmental toxicology studies were not conducted since cytotoxic (i.e. genotoxic) drugs that affect actively dividing cells, such as loncastuximab tesirine, are expected to be embryo/feto toxic and teratogenic.”
✓ VerifiedFDA multi-discipline review, p. 39Source ↗
GLPCriticised but acceptedBeyond the letter
GLP deviation in a monkey study: formulation analyses out of range with an unvalidated analytical method
Why: Dose-related toxicities indicate correct dosing · Weight of evidence
“Study No. 8374716: Some of the analysed concentrations for formulations were out of range (below LOD), therefore not valid and the analytical method used for those analysis was not validated. The applicant was requested to justify why those deviations to GLP do not jeopardise the validity of the study.”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 35Source ↗
“Dose-related effects such as skin effects, nephropathy and testicular changes were observed in toxicology studies. These results indicate the correct dosage.”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 35Source ↗

Similar precedents