Not reported in the public reviews. Reviewers summarise selectively, so this usually means it wasn't discussed publicly, not that it wasn't studied.
Repeat-dose tox before first-in-human
Not stated in public reviews
Not reported in the public reviews. Reviewers summarise selectively, so this usually means it wasn't discussed publicly, not that it wasn't studied.
First-in-human starting dose
1/6 HNSTD in cynomolgus monkey cited as rationale for species choice; actual FIH calculation not detailed
“The cynomolgus monkey was selected as nonclinical species for safety evaluation of loncastuximab tesirine, given the greater predictive value of PK data generated in this species for humans, potential for reduced impact of antidrug antibody (ADA) formation on drug exposure, and the proven utility of 1/6th highest non‐severely toxic dose (HNSTD) for setting clinical starting doses with ADCs.”
✓ VerifiedFDA multi-discipline review, p. 49Source ↗
Longest repeat-dose systemic studies
Longest repeat-dose study and recovery
13-week GLP cynomolgus monkey (ADC) with 12-week recovery
“The Applicant conducted GLP 4‐week and 13‐week repeat‐dose general toxicology studies in which cynomolgus monkeys were dosed with the ADC, followed by a 12‐week recovery period.”
✓ VerifiedFDA multi-discipline review, p. 50Source ↗
Pivotal GLP studies
GLP monkey 4-week (0.3, 0.6 mg/kg q3w) and 13-week (0.075-0.3 mg/kg q3w) IV, 12-week recovery; SG3199 4-week rat
“The Applicant conducted GLP 4‐week and 13‐week repeat‐dose general toxicology studies in which cynomolgus monkeys were dosed with the ADC, followed by a 12‐week recovery period.”
✓ VerifiedFDA multi-discipline review, p. 50Source ↗
DART package
Species: DART
Not conducted (genotoxic cytotoxic ADC expected to be embryo-fetal toxic and teratogenic)
“Reproductive and developmental toxicology studies were not conducted since cytotoxic (i.e. genotoxic) drugs that affect actively dividing cells, such as loncastuximab tesirine, are expected to be embryo/feto toxic and teratogenic.”
✓ VerifiedFDA multi-discipline review, p. 39Source ↗
Reproductive & developmental
Not conducted (ICH S9); irreversible testicular toxicity in monkey; fertility assessed in repeat-dose study
“Reproductive and developmental toxicology studies were not conducted since cytotoxic (i.e. genotoxic) drugs that affect actively dividing cells, such as loncastuximab tesirine, are expected to be embryo/feto toxic and teratogenic.”
✓ VerifiedFDA multi-discipline review, p. 39Source ↗
PPND / ePPND: when
No reproductive and developmental toxicity studies; genotoxic cytotoxic ADC expected to be embryo-fetal toxic and teratogenic
“Reproductive and developmental toxicology studies were not conducted since cytotoxic (i.e. genotoxic) drugs that affect actively dividing cells, such as loncastuximab tesirine, are expected to be embryo/feto toxic and teratogenic.”
✓ VerifiedFDA multi-discipline review, p. 39Source ↗
Carcinogenicity
Species: carcinogenicity
Not conducted (ICH S9; genotoxic payload, advanced cancer)
“In accordance with ICH S9, ICH S6(R1) and ICH S1A (Guideline on the Need for Carcinogenicity Studies of Pharmaceuticals) no carcinogenicity studies were conducted or are planned with ADCT-402 or SG3199 given the genotoxic mode of action of SG3199 (covalent DNA crosslinking/ alkylating agent) and the intended clinical use in patients with advanced cancer.”
Not conducted (ICH S9; genotoxic payload, advanced cancer)
“In accordance with ICH S9, ICH S6(R1) and ICH S1A (Guideline on the Need for Carcinogenicity Studies of Pharmaceuticals) no carcinogenicity studies were conducted or are planned with ADCT-402 or SG3199 given the genotoxic mode of action of SG3199 (covalent DNA crosslinking/ alkylating agent) and the intended clinical use in patients with advanced cancer.”
Not required: genotoxic payload, advanced cancer (ICH S9, S6(R1), S1A)
“In accordance with ICH S9, ICH S6(R1) and ICH S1A, no carcinogenicity studies were conducted with loncastuximab tesirine or SG3199 given the genotoxic mode of action of SG3199 (see Section 5.5.2) and the intended clinical use in patients with advanced cancer.”
✓ VerifiedFDA multi-discipline review, p. 63Source ↗