SpeciesAccepted
No in vivo toxicology; all toxicology in vitro with human tissues and cells (no relevant species for HLA-restricted TCR and human CD3)
Why: Human-specific protein; no relevant animal species in which toxicology could be tested · No relevant species · Within the guideline
“Tebentafusp can only recognize human HLA; therefore, all nonclinical toxicology studies were conducted in vitro. Human tissue and cell-based in vitro approaches were taken to understand potential organ-specific toxicities that may arise in the clinical setting with tebentafusp.”
✓ VerifiedFDA multi-discipline review, p. 44Source ↗ “As tebentafusp is a human-specific protein, there are no relevant animal species in which non-clinical toxicology of tebentafusp could be tested.”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 34Source ↗ Safety pharmacologyAcceptedBeyond the letter
No safety pharmacology studies; functional in vitro assays across human tissue cell types instead
Why: Tebentafusp only recognises human HLA · No relevant species
“Tebentafusp can only recognize human HLA; therefore, all nonclinical toxicology studies were conducted in vitro. Therefore, no specific safety pharmacology studies were conducted.”
✓ VerifiedFDA multi-discipline review, p. 42Source ↗ “The FDA’s Assessment: FDA agrees.”
✓ VerifiedFDA multi-discipline review, p. 42Source ↗ DARTAcceptedBeyond the letter
No embryo-fetal or other DART studies; literature-based weight-of-evidence assessment instead
Why: Human-specific targets; embryo-fetal studies cannot be conducted in nonclinical species · No relevant species · Weight of evidence
“Due to the specificity for human targets, embryo-fetal development (EFD) studies cannot be conducted in nonclinical species. Therefore, a weight of evidence assessment was conducted to evaluate the risk of tebentafusp administration on pregnancy and embryo-fetal development.”
✓ VerifiedFDA multi-discipline review, p. 46Source ↗ “No carcinogenicity, genotoxicity, or developmental and reproductive toxicity studies have been conducted with tebentafusp. This is acceptable.”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 34Source ↗ GLPVerdict not stated
In vitro human-blood safety studies, such as cytokine release assessment, conducted non-GLP
“The potential for cytokine release syndrome (CRS) was assessed in blood from 6 healthy HLA-A*02:01-positive donors incubated with increasing concentrations of tebentafusp, and samples were analyzed for evidence of cytokine release by multiplex. These studies were non-GLP.”
✓ VerifiedFDA multi-discipline review, p. 41Source ↗ Safety marginAcceptedBeyond the letter
No in vitro margin for on-target melanocyte reactivity: patient serum concentrations exceed melanocyte EC50 (margin below 1)
Why: Skin adverse events, consistent with in vitro data, appear manageable in clinical trials · Human data
“In vitro studies suggest some safety margin between the two cell types, however not convincing. When comparing serum concentrations in patients just after infusion with EC50 in normal melanocytes, the safety margin is below 1.”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 31Source ↗ “High incidence of AEs related to the skin is well documented in the clinical trials but appear to be manageable. The high incidence is therefore consistent with these in vitro data.”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 32Source ↗