SpeciesAcceptedBeyond the letter
No pharmacologically relevant species; limited single-dose studies plus partially active murine surrogate BiLu
Why: No cross-reactivity with CD3 or EpCAM in any routine species, including NHPs · No relevant species
“None of the animal species analysed is suitable for assessing the safety of catumaxomab. Any in vivo study with catumaxomab provides results on safety of catumaxomab with limited information for humans.”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 37Source ↗ “Therefore, the non-clinical programme is based on in vitro studies and a tailored in vivo programme with catumaxomab and a surrogate mAb BiLu, that is cross-reactive with CD3 and therefore partially active in mice. This is accepted.”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 39Source ↗ Study lengthVerdict not stated
No repeat-dose toxicity studies with catumaxomab
Why: No appropriate animal species · No relevant species
“Repeat-dose toxicity studies have not been performed with catumaxomab due to the lack of an appropriate animal species.”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 38Source ↗ DARTVerdict not stated
No reproductive and developmental toxicity studies
Why: No appropriate animal species; patients with late-stage malignant disease · No relevant species · Within the guideline
“Studies to investigate reproductive and developmental toxicity have not been performed due to the lack of an appropriate animal species, the intended patient population with late-stage malignant disease.”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 38Source ↗ Safety marginVerdict not stated
Surrogate BiLu mouse NOAEL equivalent to the clinical catumaxomab dose (no margin)
“In this study, the no observed adverse effect level (NOAEL) for BiLu is considered to be the low dose (0.2 to 3.0 μg/kg). This mouse dose is equivalent to the catumaxomab dose used in the clinical regimen; the maximum human dose is 100 µg (i.e. 1.43 µg/kg in a 70 kg person).”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 38Source ↗