DARTAcceptedBeyond the letter
No embryo-fetal development study; weight-of-evidence assessment of reproductive and embryo-fetal risk instead
Why: Risks to human development can be communicated from existing scientific information without further animal studies · Weight of evidence
“Rather than conducting a dedicated embryofetal development study, Janssen provided a weight-of-evidence-based assessment of the potential for amivantamab to cause reproductive and embryofetal toxicity.”
✓ VerifiedFDA multi-discipline review, p. 37Source ↗ “Taken together, the view that the risks of amivantamab to human development can be communicated appropriately to patients and prescribers based on the existing scientific information without conducting additional developmental animal studies is agreed.”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 42Source ↗ OtherCriticised but acceptedBeyond the letter
Highest dose in monkey repeat-dose studies not fully justified (dose volume above recommended maximum)
Why: EGFR and MET are well characterised targets and the indication is advanced cancer · Pharmacology or kinetics · Serious disease
“Taken together, the highest dose level employed in the repeat-dose toxicity studies is not considered fully justified but given that EFGR and MET are rather well characterised targets, and that amivantamab is indicated for treatment of patients with advanced cancer, no further studies are needed.”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 41Source ↗