CarcinogenicityAcceptedBeyond the letter
No carcinogenicity studies with vector or novel excipient; weight-of-evidence assessment for a non-advanced cancer indication
Why: Limited exposure due to dosing once per three months and low systemic levels of excipient and vector reduce carcinogenicity risk · Weight of evidence · Pharmacology or kinetics
“As the proposed indication (high grade Bacillus Calmette-Guerin unresponsive non-muscle invasive bladder cancer) is not an advanced cancer indication, the omission of carcinogenicity evaluation needed to be supported with a weight-of-evidence (WoE) approach for both the vector and the novel excipient.”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 46Source ↗ “In summary, the limited exposure due to dosing frequency (not chronic, but once per three months) together with the low systemic levels of Syn3NODA and rAd-IFN/IFNα2b reduce the risk for potential carcinogenicity/tumorigenicity.”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 46Source ↗ DARTAcceptedBeyond the letter
No reproductive and developmental toxicity studies with vector or excipient Syn3
Why: Transient vector DNA in gonads; intravesical route precludes standard studies; infrequent dosing and limited systemic exposure · Pharmacology or kinetics · Weight of evidence
“Developmental and Reproductive Toxicity studies were not conducted using rAd-IFN/Syn3 or Syn3 alone based on the transient rAd-IFN DNA levels detected in the gonads in the biodistribution analysis of rAd-IFN/Syn3”
✓ VerifiedFDA pharmacology/toxicology review, p. 8Source ↗ “The omission of these studies was not considered significant, given the clinical route of administration and inability to conduct standard studies by this route, and the infrequent dosing and anticipated limited systemic exposure.”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 47Source ↗ GenotoxicityAcceptedBeyond the letter
No genotoxicity assessment of the adenoviral vector; justified with literature on adenoviral integration
Why: Literature on adenoviral integration in treated patients; new bladder tumours more likely reflect natural course of disease · Human data · Weight of evidence
“Absence of genotoxicity assessment of rAd-IFN was justified with literature information on the potential for adenoviral integration in the host genome from (bladder) cells of NMIBC patients treated with Adstiladrin (after treatment with BCG).”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 38Source ↗ “However, any new bladder tumour in clinical practice will more likely reflect the natural course of NMIBC rather than insertional mutagenesis.”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 38Source ↗ BiodistributionCriticised but acceptedBeyond the letter
Vector biodistribution in monkey limited to bladder, liver, kidney and gonads; no full tissue analysis
Why: Impact of limited systemic vector exposure on patient safety anticipated to be low · Pharmacology or kinetics
“In a GLP cynomolgus monkey study, tissue distribution of rAd-IFN was studied following intravesical administration, but only for bladder, liver, kidney and gonad tissue. A full tissue analysis of the presence and persistence of rAd-IFN has not been performed.”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 34Source ↗ “However, the impact of limited systemic exposure to this vector on patient safety is anticipated to be low.”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 44Source ↗ Safety marginVerdict not stated
Low local exposure multiples in monkey: 3.11 for vector and 1.87 for Syn3 (dose-based)
“The local exposure multiples between monkeys and humans are low with 3.11 for nadofaragene firadenovec and 1.87 for Syn3NODA based on dose. Effects seen in non-clinical monkey studies at a local level can therefore be of clinical relevance.”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 40Source ↗