SpeciesCriticised but accepted
Toxicity tested in a single species (mouse), chosen only on historical use
Why: Nature of the product and toxicities seen; consistent with the EMA gene therapy guideline · Within the guideline · Low-risk modality
“A justification for the choice of mice is not specified, other than the suggestion that this species is historically used in toxicity studies.”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 34Source ↗ “Toxicology: Considering the nature of the product and the toxicities seen, the use of a single species (mice) for the toxicity studies is considered acceptable and in line with the “Guideline on the quality, non-clinical and clinical aspects of gene therapy medicinal products (EMA/CAT/80183/2014)”.”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 34Source ↗ DARTAcceptedBeyond the letter
No developmental and reproductive toxicity studies
Why: Non-integrating, non-replicating vector; negligible germline transmission risk · Low-risk modality
“As the vector backbone is claimed to be non-integrating and non-replicating, it is accepted that the risk for potential germline transmission is negligible and additional DART studies are not required.”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 35Source ↗ CarcinogenicityAccepted
No carcinogenicity studies; literature weight-of-evidence risk assessment for HSV-1 instead
Why: No association between HSV-1 and cancer; EMA gene therapy guideline; low insertional mutagenesis risk · Weight of evidence · Within the guideline · Low-risk modality
“Carcinogenicity No carcinogenicity studies were performed, and the applicant provided a weight of evidence risk assessment, based on a literature search up to July 2024. This did not identify any association or risk factor identification for HSV-1 infection and cancer.”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 32Source ↗ “In-line with the CHMP’s “Guideline on the quality, non-clinical and clinical aspects of gene therapy medicinal products (EMA/CAT/80183/2014)” the absence of standard rodent carcinogenicity studies is acceptable. The risk of insertional mutagenesis is considered low and the expressed COL7 protein is not expected to provide a proliferative advantage to cells.”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 32Source ↗