GLPCriticised but acceptedBeyond the letter
Definitive repeat-dose toxicology study non-GLP, in wild-type mice only; murine antigen processing likely differs from human
Why: No safety findings at about 5-fold the clinical dose · Other reason
“The dose level assessed in this non-GLP toxicology study provides a 5-fold safety factor for the clinical dose level with the caveat that the processing and binding sequences in wildtype mice is likely different than the peptides recognized by human T cells .”
✓ VerifiedFDA pharmacology/toxicology review, p. 13Source ↗ “The lack of safety findings in this definitive repeat administration safety study conducted in mice provide limited support for the safety of the clinical route of administration and clinical dose level.”
✓ VerifiedFDA pharmacology/toxicology review, p. 13Source ↗ BiodistributionAcceptedBeyond the letter
No biodistribution or shedding studies
Why: Product characteristics and nonclinical safety profile · Low-risk modality
“No biodistribution (BD), genotoxicity, carcinogenicity, reproductive and developmental toxicity, juvenile, nor dedicated local tolerance studies of PRGN-2012 were conducted. These studies are not warranted based on the product characteristics and nonclinical safety profile of PRGN-2012.”
✓ VerifiedFDA pharmacology/toxicology review, p. 4Source ↗ DARTAcceptedBeyond the letter
No developmental and reproductive toxicity studies
Why: Locally administered adenovectors have a well-defined, predictable biodistribution profile · Class precedent
“Locally administered adenovectors (SC or intramuscular) have a well-defined and predictable BD profile that is consistent despite differences in vector serotypes, transduction methods, payload, and manufacturing processes; thus, PRGN-2012 is expected to behave similarly to human .”
✓ VerifiedFDA pharmacology/toxicology review, p. 13Source ↗ “This reviewer agrees with the rationale provided by the applicant for not conducting developmental and reproductive toxicology studies.”
✓ VerifiedFDA pharmacology/toxicology review, p. 13Source ↗ CarcinogenicityAcceptedBeyond the letter
No carcinogenicity or tumorigenicity studies
Why: Adenovectors are non-integrating; adenovirus has not shown significant tumorigenicity risk in humans · Low-risk modality · Class precedent
“Per the applicant, studies were not conducted to evaluate carcinogenicity as adenovectors are non-integrating. Therefore, the risk for insertional mutagenesis is not a major concern. In addition, previous data indicates adenovirus has not demonstrated a significant risk for tumorigenicity in humans.”
✓ VerifiedFDA pharmacology/toxicology review, p. 14Source ↗ “This reviewer agrees with the rationale provided by the applicant for not conducting carcinogenicity/tumorigenicity studies.”
✓ VerifiedFDA pharmacology/toxicology review, p. 14Source ↗