Efficacy modelAcceptedBeyond the letter
No in vivo pharmacology studies with the product; in vitro human cell data plus published literature only
Why: Published literature used as supportive information · Other reason
“No in vivo pharmacology studies were carried out in support of this application, and this is acceptable. The applicant refers to studies published in the literature as supportive information.”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 43Source ↗ CarcinogenicityAcceptedBeyond the letter
No genotoxicity, carcinogenicity or insertional mutagenesis studies; weight-of-evidence discussion instead
Why: Weight of evidence indicates low risk of genomic integration or tumorigenicity in post-mitotic neuronal cells · Weight of evidence · Low-risk modality
“It was previously agreed with CHMP that genotoxicity, carcinogenicity and evaluation of insertional mutagenesis studies were not required (EMEA/CHMP/SAWP/236092/2018).”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 41Source ↗ “Based on the weight of evidence discussed there appears to be a low risk for genomic integration or tumorigenicity in post-mitotic neuronal cells.”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 44Source ↗ DARTAcceptedBeyond the letter
No developmental and reproductive toxicology studies
Why: Local brain administration, no systemic exposure and no gonadal biodistribution · Pharmacology or kinetics
“No specific developmental and reproductive toxicology studies were conducted by the applicant with eladocagene exuparvovec, in agreement with CHMP. Given the local administration of eladocagene exuparvovec to the brain and lack of systemic exposure, and the absence of biodistribution to the gonads, the risk for germline transmission is low.”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 41Source ↗ Juvenile toxAcceptedBeyond the letter
Second planned juvenile monkey biodistribution and toxicity study waived after the route-of-administration study
Why: Superior putamen expression with intraputaminal route at 10-fold lower dose than ICV or IT routes · Pharmacology or kinetics
“Based on the data obtained in the initial RoA study demonstrating superior expression in the target putamen region with iPut administration despite using a 10-fold lower dose as compared to ICV and IT administration, a waiver (EMEA-002435-PIP01-18-M02 [eladocagene exuparvovec]) for the second study was submitted to PDCO and accepted 16 December 2020.”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 41Source ↗