Nonclinical precedent Request an invite

Itvisma

onasemnogene abeparvovec (intrathecal)
gene therapySMN1 (AAV9, intrathecal)Non-replicating recombinant AAV9 delivering human SMN1, intrathecalSMA with SMN1 mutations, age 2 years and older
Species
MonkeyMouse
Longest study
52 wk
Genotox
Not conducted Not conducted
Carcinogenicity
Not conducted Not conducted
Repro
Conducted Conducted
First dose
Conducted Stated

Speciesopen answer page →

Species
Cynomolgus monkey (pivotal IT tox); FVB mice for ICV safety and fertility/EFD; SMA piglet and SMN-delta7 mouse pharmacology
“In vivo toxicology/safety studies conducted in NHPs utilized a single IT administration of OAV101 at 1.2 x 1013 vg/animal, considered equivalent to the proposed starting clinical dose level for ITVISMA of 1.2x1014 vg/patient based on a 10-fold difference in CSF volume between NHP and human.”
✓ VerifiedFDA summary basis for approval, p. 15Source ↗
Why that species
NHP IT delivery transduces 55-79% of ChAT+ spinal motor neurons; CSF volume scaling NHP to human
“IT administration of scAAV9.CBA.SMN demonstrated a 55-79% transduction efficiency of choline acetyltransferase (ChAT) positive motor neurons in NHP spinal cords.”
✓ VerifiedFDA summary basis for approval, p. 15Source ↗
Surrogate molecule
No surrogate; research-grade lots (scAAV9.CBA.SMN, OAV101, OAV101B) of the clinical vector, OAV101B most comparable
“The nonclinical development program for ITVISMA evaluated research grade lots, referred to as scAAV9.CBA.SMN, OAV101, and OAV101B, to inform the safety and activity of ITVISMA.”
✓ VerifiedFDA summary basis for approval, p. 15Source ↗
Species: general tox
NHP (single IT dose) and newborn FVB mouse (single ICV dose)
“Additional single-dose studies in the newborn Friend Virus B (FVB) mouse strain and NHPs further demonstrated high tolerability to OAV101 or scAAV9.CBA.SMN following ICV or IT administration, respectively, with no major safety signals.”
✓ VerifiedFDA summary basis for approval, p. 16Source ↗
Species: DART
Mouse (FVB; fertility and early embryonic development, single IV dose)
“Fertility and early embryonic development (FEED) studies were conducted in healthy male and female FVB mice administered a single intravenous injection of OAV101B.”
✓ VerifiedFDA summary basis for approval, p. 16Source ↗
Species: carcinogenicity
Not conducted
“No carcinogenicity, genotoxicity, or repeat dosing were conducted for OAV101B.”
✓ VerifiedFDA summary basis for approval, p. 16Source ↗
Surrogate used in
No surrogate molecule; research-grade vector lots (scAAV9.CBA.SMN, OAV101, OAV101B) used
“The nonclinical development program for ITVISMA evaluated research grade lots, referred to as scAAV9.CBA.SMN, OAV101, and OAV101B, to inform the safety and activity of ITVISMA.”
✓ VerifiedFDA summary basis for approval, p. 15Source ↗

Study lengthopen answer page →

Longest pivotal study
52 weeks
“These studies demonstrated that OAV101 was well tolerated at this dose level up to 12 months post injection, with minor microscopic findings reported 6 weeks post-administration in the dorsal root ganglia (DRG), spinal cord, peripheral nerves, and brain that did not increase in severity or incidence over the 12 month study.”
✓ VerifiedFDA summary basis for approval, p. 15Source ↗
Pivotal GLP studies
Single-dose IT NHP study (1.2, 3.0, 6.0 x10^13 vg/animal) to 12 months; mouse ICV studies; IV mouse FEED and EFD
“A single IT dose of onasemnogene abeparvovec was administered at three dose levels: 1.20 × 10 13 vg/animal (equivalent to the clinical therapeutic dose), 3.0 × 10 13 vg/animal, and 6.0 × 10 13 vg/animal.”
✓ VerifiedUS prescribing informationSource ↗
Route in tox
Intrathecal (NHP); intracerebroventricular (neonatal mice); intravenous (mouse fertility/EFD)
“Additional single-dose studies in the newborn Friend Virus B (FVB) mouse strain and NHPs further demonstrated high tolerability to OAV101 or scAAV9.CBA.SMN following ICV or IT administration, respectively, with no major safety signals.”
✓ VerifiedFDA summary basis for approval, p. 16Source ↗

Skipped studiesopen answer page →

Genotoxicity
Not conducted (single administration, known product characteristics, class safety profile)
“No carcinogenicity, genotoxicity, or repeat dosing were conducted for OAV101B.”
✓ VerifiedFDA summary basis for approval, p. 16Source ↗
Carcinogenicity
Not conducted (single administration, known product characteristics, class safety profile)
“These studies are not necessary based on the intended ROA, dosing regimen (i.e., single infusion), known product characteristics, and overall safety profile for this class of product.”
✓ VerifiedFDA summary basis for approval, p. 16Source ↗
Instead of carcinogenicity
Long-term follow-up studies capturing new malignancies and tumours under the risk management plan, instead of tumorigenicity studies
“Long-term follow-up studies that specifically include the occurrence of new malignancies and tumours as part of the risk management plan in place for OAV101. Therefore, tumorigenicity studies are not needed.”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 45Source ↗
DRG histopathology
Minor microscopic findings in DRG, spinal cord, peripheral nerves and brain at 6 weeks in NHP, without progression over 12 months
“These studies demonstrated that OAV101 was well tolerated at this dose level up to 12 months post injection, with minor microscopic findings reported 6 weeks post-administration in the dorsal root ganglia (DRG), spinal cord, peripheral nerves, and brain that did not increase in severity or incidence over the 12 month study.”
✓ VerifiedFDA summary basis for approval, p. 15Source ↗
Reproductive & developmental
Mouse FEED (single IV OAV101B): no fertility effects, no germline transmission; mouse EFD NOAEL 1.1x10^14 vg/kg
“Fertility and early embryonic development (FEED) studies were conducted in healthy male and female FVB mice administered a single intravenous injection of OAV101B. There were no reported adverse effects on fertility, fecundity, or mating behaviors in either sex.”
✓ VerifiedFDA summary basis for approval, p. 16Source ↗
Safety pharmacology
Not stated in public reviews
Not reported in the public reviews. Reviewers summarise selectively, so this usually means it wasn't discussed publicly, not that it wasn't studied.
Genotox: Ames
Not conducted (not necessary for a single-infusion product of this class)
“No carcinogenicity, genotoxicity, or repeat dosing were conducted for OAV101B. These studies are not necessary based on the intended ROA, dosing regimen (i.e., single infusion), known product characteristics, and overall safety profile for this class of product.”
✓ VerifiedFDA summary basis for approval, p. 16Source ↗
Genotox: in vitro mammalian
Not conducted (not necessary for a single-infusion product of this class)
“No carcinogenicity, genotoxicity, or repeat dosing were conducted for OAV101B. These studies are not necessary based on the intended ROA, dosing regimen (i.e., single infusion), known product characteristics, and overall safety profile for this class of product.”
✓ VerifiedFDA summary basis for approval, p. 16Source ↗
Genotox: in vivo
Not conducted (not necessary for a single-infusion product of this class)
“No carcinogenicity, genotoxicity, or repeat dosing were conducted for OAV101B. These studies are not necessary based on the intended ROA, dosing regimen (i.e., single infusion), known product characteristics, and overall safety profile for this class of product.”
✓ VerifiedFDA summary basis for approval, p. 16Source ↗
Carcinogenicity model
Not conducted; not necessary given single infusion, known product characteristics and class safety profile
“No carcinogenicity, genotoxicity, or repeat dosing were conducted for OAV101B. These studies are not necessary based on the intended ROA, dosing regimen (i.e., single infusion), known product characteristics, and overall safety profile for this class of product.”
✓ VerifiedFDA summary basis for approval, p. 16Source ↗
Carcinogenicity timing
Not conducted: not necessary (single infusion, known product characteristics, class safety profile)
“No carcinogenicity, genotoxicity, or repeat dosing were conducted for OAV101B. These studies are not necessary based on the intended ROA, dosing regimen (i.e., single infusion), known product characteristics, and overall safety profile for this class of product.”
✓ VerifiedFDA summary basis for approval, p. 16Source ↗
hERG / QT
Not stated in public reviews
Not reported in the public reviews. Reviewers summarise selectively, so this usually means it wasn't discussed publicly, not that it wasn't studied.

First doseopen answer page →

First-in-human starting dose
NHP-tolerated 1.2x10^13 vg/animal scaled 10-fold by CSF volume to human starting dose 1.2x10^14 vg/patient
“In vivo toxicology/safety studies conducted in NHPs utilized a single IT administration of OAV101 at 1.2 x 1013 vg/animal, considered equivalent to the proposed starting clinical dose level for ITVISMA of 1.2x1014 vg/patient based on a 10-fold difference in CSF volume between NHP and human.”
✓ VerifiedFDA summary basis for approval, p. 15Source ↗
NOAEL / key findings
NOAEL not determined; minimal-moderate DRG/neuronal degeneration, inflammation, spinal axonopathy, transient liver enzymes; resolved by 12 months
“At 6 weeks post-administration, all dose levels resulted in acute, minimal to moderate mononuclear cell inflammation and neuronal degeneration across multiple anatomical sites, including the cerebrum, cerebellar white matter, brain stem, dorsal root ganglia, and various nerve structures (trigeminal, dorsal spinal, spinal, and peripheral nerves).”
✓ VerifiedUS prescribing informationSource ↗

Risksopen answer page →

Immune & cytokine safety
Mononuclear cell inflammation in NHP neural tissue; clinically all patients developed high anti-AAV9 titers, anti-SMN in ~7%
“Anti-AAV9 antibody responses were consistent and robust across all studies, with all participants developing high titers that remained elevated through study completion.”
✓ VerifiedFDA summary basis for approval, p. 17Source ↗
Biodistribution & persistence
Highest in liver, DRG, spinal cord; lower peripheral incl. gonads; clinical shedding mainly fecal, >90% within 2 weeks
“Biodistribution (BD) of OAV101 demonstrated the highest titers in the liver, DRG, and spinal cord, with lower levels reported in the periphery, including gonads.”
✓ VerifiedFDA summary basis for approval, p. 16Source ↗
Modality-specific risk
AAV9 DRG/neuronal toxicity and hepatotoxicity after IT dosing, precluding NOAEL; vector immunity
“Elevated liver enzyme levels (aspartate and alanine amino transferase) and single cell necrosis of hepatocytes were observed in select NHPs at 6 weeks post-administration but resolved by 12 months post-administration.”
✓ VerifiedUS prescribing informationSource ↗
Anti-drug antibodies: animals
Not stated in public reviews
Not reported in the public reviews. Reviewers summarise selectively, so this usually means it wasn't discussed publicly, not that it wasn't studied.
Anti-drug antibodies: patients
Anti-AAV9 titers rose in all patients (median ≥1:819,200 at 12 months); anti-SMN antibodies in 6.7% and 7.4%
“Increases from baseline in anti-AAV9 antibody titers were reported in all patients with a median anti-AAV9 antibody titers of ≥ 1:819,200 at 12 months following ITVISMA injection in both studies. During the 12-month period following ITVISMA injection in Study 1 and Study 2, positive anti-SMN antibodies were observed in 5/75 (6.7%) and 2/27 (7.4%) of ITVISMA-treated patients, respectively.”
✓ VerifiedUS prescribing informationSource ↗
Label warnings
Boxed warning: Serious liver injury
  • Hepatotoxicity
  • Thrombocytopenia
  • Peripheral Sensory Neuropathy
  • Thrombotic Microangiopathy
  • Elevated Cardiac Troponin I
  • AAV Vector Integration and Risk of Tumorigenicity
HepatotoxicityThrombocytopeniaNeurotoxicityThrombosis & embolismCardiovascularSecondary malignancy
US prescribing information, Boxed Warning and Warnings and PrecautionsDailyMed ↗

Tox packageopen answer page →

Before first-in-human

First-in-human: where
Not stated in public reviews
Not reported in the public reviews. Reviewers summarise selectively, so this usually means it wasn't discussed publicly, not that it wasn't studied.
Repeat-dose tox before first-in-human
Not stated in public reviews
Not reported in the public reviews. Reviewers summarise selectively, so this usually means it wasn't discussed publicly, not that it wasn't studied.
First-in-human starting dose
NHP-tolerated 1.2x10^13 vg/animal scaled 10-fold by CSF volume to human starting dose 1.2x10^14 vg/patient
“In vivo toxicology/safety studies conducted in NHPs utilized a single IT administration of OAV101 at 1.2 x 1013 vg/animal, considered equivalent to the proposed starting clinical dose level for ITVISMA of 1.2x1014 vg/patient based on a 10-fold difference in CSF volume between NHP and human.”
✓ VerifiedFDA summary basis for approval, p. 15Source ↗

Longest repeat-dose systemic studies

Longest repeat-dose study and recovery
No repeat-dose study (single administration)
“No carcinogenicity, genotoxicity, or repeat dosing were conducted for OAV101B. These studies are not necessary based on the intended ROA, dosing regimen (i.e., single infusion), known product characteristics, and overall safety profile for this class of product.”
✓ VerifiedFDA summary basis for approval, p. 16Source ↗
Pivotal GLP studies
Single-dose IT NHP study (1.2, 3.0, 6.0 x10^13 vg/animal) to 12 months; mouse ICV studies; IV mouse FEED and EFD
“A single IT dose of onasemnogene abeparvovec was administered at three dose levels: 1.20 × 10 13 vg/animal (equivalent to the clinical therapeutic dose), 3.0 × 10 13 vg/animal, and 6.0 × 10 13 vg/animal.”
✓ VerifiedUS prescribing informationSource ↗

DART package

Species: DART
Mouse (FVB; fertility and early embryonic development, single IV dose)
“Fertility and early embryonic development (FEED) studies were conducted in healthy male and female FVB mice administered a single intravenous injection of OAV101B.”
✓ VerifiedFDA summary basis for approval, p. 16Source ↗
Reproductive & developmental
Mouse FEED (single IV OAV101B): no fertility effects, no germline transmission; mouse EFD NOAEL 1.1x10^14 vg/kg
“Fertility and early embryonic development (FEED) studies were conducted in healthy male and female FVB mice administered a single intravenous injection of OAV101B. There were no reported adverse effects on fertility, fecundity, or mating behaviors in either sex.”
✓ VerifiedFDA summary basis for approval, p. 16Source ↗
PPND / ePPND: when
Not stated in public reviews
Not reported in the public reviews. Reviewers summarise selectively, so this usually means it wasn't discussed publicly, not that it wasn't studied.

Carcinogenicity

Species: carcinogenicity
Not conducted
“No carcinogenicity, genotoxicity, or repeat dosing were conducted for OAV101B.”
✓ VerifiedFDA summary basis for approval, p. 16Source ↗
Carcinogenicity model
Not conducted; not necessary given single infusion, known product characteristics and class safety profile
“No carcinogenicity, genotoxicity, or repeat dosing were conducted for OAV101B. These studies are not necessary based on the intended ROA, dosing regimen (i.e., single infusion), known product characteristics, and overall safety profile for this class of product.”
✓ VerifiedFDA summary basis for approval, p. 16Source ↗
Carcinogenicity timing
Not conducted: not necessary (single infusion, known product characteristics, class safety profile)
“No carcinogenicity, genotoxicity, or repeat dosing were conducted for OAV101B. These studies are not necessary based on the intended ROA, dosing regimen (i.e., single infusion), known product characteristics, and overall safety profile for this class of product.”
✓ VerifiedFDA summary basis for approval, p. 16Source ↗

Safety marginopen answer page →

Safety margin at NOAEL
No margin: NHP neural toxicity findings precluded determination of a NOAEL
“These toxicity findings precluded the determination of a no-observed”
✓ VerifiedFDA summary basis for approval, p. 15Source ↗
NOAEL / key findings
NOAEL not determined; minimal-moderate DRG/neuronal degeneration, inflammation, spinal axonopathy, transient liver enzymes; resolved by 12 months
“At 6 weeks post-administration, all dose levels resulted in acute, minimal to moderate mononuclear cell inflammation and neuronal degeneration across multiple anatomical sites, including the cerebrum, cerebellar white matter, brain stem, dorsal root ganglia, and various nerve structures (trigeminal, dorsal spinal, spinal, and peripheral nerves).”
✓ VerifiedUS prescribing informationSource ↗

Efficacy evidenceopen answer page →

Efficacy evidence
SMA piglet model, IT research-grade vector (scAAV9.CBA.SMN): prevented hindlimb weakness and slowed disease progression
“In a piglet model of SMA, scAAV9.CBA.SMN administered by the IT ROA prevented the development of hindlimb muscle weakness and slowed overall disease progression.”
✓ VerifiedFDA summary basis for approval, p. 15Source ↗
Why that model
Pharmacology relied on studies/publications already evaluated for the Zolgensma marketing authorisation
“All the submitted studies / publications have already been evaluated during marketing authorisation application for Zolgensma and are addressed below.”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 28Source ↗
Reviewer's view of the efficacy data
EMA: animal efficacious doses suggest the targeted IT dose is not achievable in patients; clinical dose must rest on clinical data
“Thus, a rough comparison, not taking into consideration ICV versus IT and differences between mice and men, would conclude that the clinically targeted intrathecal dose is not achievable in patients. Support for the clinical dose should be derived from clinical data.”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 28Source ↗

Test articleopen answer page →

Test article vs clinical lot
Research grade lots scAAV9.CBA.SMN, OAV101 and OAV101B used in the nonclinical programme. Bridging: Among the research lots, OAV101B had specifications most comparable to the clinical product
“The nonclinical development program for ITVISMA evaluated research grade lots, referred to as scAAV9.CBA.SMN, OAV101, and OAV101B, to inform the safety and activity of ITVISMA.”
✓ VerifiedFDA summary basis for approval, p. 15Source ↗
Vector and route
Non-replicating recombinant AAV9 vector delivering SMN1, given intrathecally
“ITVISMA is a non-replicating recombinant AAV9 vector that delivers a functional copy of the human survival motor neuron gene (SMN1) to transduced cells.”
✓ VerifiedFDA summary basis for approval, p. 16Source ↗
First approval
2025 (FDA)
“Summary Basis for Regulatory Action Date: November 24, 2025”
✓ VerifiedFDA summary basis for approval, p. 2Source ↗

Flexibilityopen answer page →

Flexibility accepted
Safety marginVerdict not stated
No NOAEL in the pivotal intrathecal NHP study; DRG, spinal cord, nerve and brain findings at the clinical-equivalent dose
Why: Findings minor and did not increase in severity or incidence over 12 months
“with minor microscopic findings reported 6 weeks post-administration in the dorsal root ganglia (DRG), spinal cord, peripheral nerves, and brain that did not increase in severity or incidence over the 12 month study. These toxicity findings precluded the determination of a no-observed”
✓ VerifiedFDA summary basis for approval, p. 14Source ↗
CarcinogenicityAccepted with a conditionBeyond the letter
No carcinogenicity/tumorigenicity or genotoxicity studies; long-term clinical follow-up for malignancies instead
Why: Single administration, known product characteristics, class safety profile; low integration risk with long-term follow-up for malignancies in the RMP · Class precedent · Low-risk modality
“No carcinogenicity, genotoxicity, or repeat dosing were conducted for OAV101B. These studies are not necessary based on the intended ROA, dosing regimen (i.e., single infusion), known product characteristics, and overall safety profile for this class of product.”
✓ VerifiedFDA summary basis for approval, p. 15Source ↗
“Long-term follow-up studies that specifically include the occurrence of new malignancies and tumours as part of the risk management plan in place for OAV101. Therefore, tumorigenicity studies are not needed.”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 45Source ↗
BiodistributionVerdict not stated
Germline transmission risk not evaluable in mouse fertility studies, as mouse germ cells are not transduced
“Although no vertical transmission of OAV101 vector DNA was observed in foetuses, it is important to note that these mouse studies are not appropriate to further evaluate the risk of inadvertent germline transmission, since mice did not reveal any vector DNA in germ cells.”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 45Source ↗
BiodistributionQuestioned
No intrathecal dose below the clinical-equivalent dose tested in NHP; CNS and DRG biodistribution plateau assumption unverified
“The Applicant assumes that this might be due to a plateau that is achieved with the lowest dose tested (1.2 x 1013 vg). However, as no lower dose levels were tested, it remains unclear whether this assumption is indeed correct.”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 41Source ↗

Similar precedents