CarcinogenicityAcceptedBeyond the letter
No carcinogenicity studies for a chronic intravitreal therapy
Why: Very low systemic exposure in patients; difficulty achieving both high systemic and intraocular exposure in a relevant study · Pharmacology or kinetics
“The main argument considered by the CHMP in order to accept the lack of carcinogenicity studies was due to the very low systemic exposure obtained in the clinical population together with the apparent difficulty to perform relevant study obtaining both high systemic and intraocular exposure.”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 12Source ↗ DARTVerdict not stated
No definitive non-rodent embryo-fetal study; only a non-GLP intravitreal rabbit dose-range-finding study
Why: Advanced age and limited reproductive potential of the AMD patient population · Other reason
“A full embryo-foetal toxicity in a non-rodent species (e.g., rabbits) was not conducted, but a non-GLP, rabbit dose-range-finding study with IVT administered pegaptanib was performed. This was justified with the advanced age and limited reproductive potential of the patient population with AMD.”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 10Source ↗ Impurity or metaboliteAcceptedBeyond the letter
Impurity intraocular safety margins only 2-3 fold
Why: Larger human eye than dog and rabbit increases the ratio to clinical local exposure · Pharmacology or kinetics
“With respect to intraocular toxicity, the safety margins are 2-3 fold. However, taking into account the larger human eye as compared to dogs and rabbits, the ratio to clinical local exposure is further increased and thus considered acceptable.”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 12Source ↗