Study lengthAccepted with a conditionBeyond the letter
No chronic rodent toxicity study to assess systemic exposure
Why: Postmarketing carcinogenicity study in one species to provide chronic toxicity data
“A less-than standard battery of nonclinical studies (no chronic toxicity study in rodent [to assess systemic exposure], pre- and postnatal development (PPND) study in rodent, or carcinogenicity studies in mouse and rat) was conducted to support approval of nusinersen.”
✓ VerifiedFDA pharmacology/toxicology review, p. 89Source ↗ “Completion of the ongoing PPND study and a carcinogenicity study in one species (which will provide chronic toxicity data) should be post-marketing requirements.”
✓ VerifiedFDA pharmacology/toxicology review, p. 89Source ↗ CarcinogenicityAccepted with a conditionBeyond the letter
No carcinogenicity studies before approval; waiver requested, parenteral study in one species required postmarketing
Why: Lifetime intrathecal rodent studies infeasible; waiver rejected because of significant systemic exposure in patients · Other reason
“Carcinogenicity studies were not conducted. The sponsor has requested a waiver based on the infeasibility of conducting lifetime studies in rodents by the IT route, but given the significant systemic exposure documented in clinical studies, it is recommended that a parenteral study in one species be conducted postmarketing.”
✓ VerifiedFDA pharmacology/toxicology review, p. 7Source ↗ DARTAccepted with a conditionBeyond the letter
Pre- and postnatal development study incomplete at approval; deferred to postmarketing requirement
“A pre- and postnatal development study is ongoing; submission of the study should be a post-marketing requirement.”
✓ VerifiedFDA pharmacology/toxicology review, p. 88Source ↗ Safety marginCriticised but acceptedBeyond the letter
No CSF-based safety margin for hippocampal neurotoxicity in the 53-week juvenile monkey study
Why: Seriousness of the indication and apparently substantial clinical efficacy · Serious disease
“The no-effect dose (0.3 mg) for neurotoxicity in the 53-week monkey study was associated with csf levels (12 ng/mL) generally less than that in SMA patients (7-35 ng/mL); therefore, there is no safety margin based on csf levels.”
✓ VerifiedFDA pharmacology/toxicology review, p. 89Source ↗ “However, considering the seriousness of the indication and the apparently substantial evidence of efficacy in the clinical trials in SMA patients, there is no objection to approval of the NDA from a pharmacology/toxicology standpoint.”
✓ VerifiedFDA pharmacology/toxicology review, p. 89Source ↗