DARTAcceptedBeyond the letter
No rabbit embryo-fetal study with donidalorsen; DART in mice only, rabbit data leveraged from the unconjugated analogue ISIS 546254
Why: Neither donidalorsen nor unconjugated ISIS 546254 is pharmacologically active in rabbit; justification supported by literature · No relevant species
“The Applicant previously sought CHMP Scientific Advice on the necessity for studies in rabbits and it was agreed that studies may not be required on the basis that neither donidalorsen nor the unconjugated PS-only compound, ISIS 546254, were pharmacologically active in the rabbit.”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 39Source ↗ “This justification is well supported in the literature and is accepted by the CHMP.”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 40Source ↗ CarcinogenicityAccepted with a conditionBeyond the letter
Final 2-year rat carcinogenicity report deferred to a postmarketing requirement; only in-life summary at submission
Why: Agreed by the Division at the pre-NDA meeting
“At the pre-NDA meeting, the Division agreed that it would be acceptable to submit the report of the 6-month carcinogenicity study in Tg.rasH2 mice and a summary of the in-life data for the 2-year carcinogenicity study in rats at the time of the NDA submission and to submit the final report as a PMR (Refer to IND 142564 pre-NDA Meeting Preliminary Comments dated 04/10/2024).”
✓ VerifiedFDA integrated review, p. 516Source ↗ Safety marginCriticised but acceptedBeyond the letter
No plasma exposure data in the Tg.rasH2 carcinogenicity study; margin extrapolated from mouse PK data
Why: Weight of evidence · Weight of evidence
“While this may provide an explanation for the observations, there was an absence of plasma exposure data in this study to allow a direct derivation of safety to the clinical exposure.”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 38Source ↗ “Thus, based on the weight of evidence the carcinogenicity assessment to date is acceptable for the CHMP.”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 38Source ↗ Juvenile toxCriticised but acceptedBeyond the letter
No AUC data or exposure margins from the juvenile mouse study
Why: Additional data would not be useful; sufficient data for adolescents (≥12 years) · Other reason
“No AUC data was available for the juvenile mouse study. The lack of AUC data from the juvenile mouse study prevents a quantitative assessment of potential increased sensitivity in younger subjects.”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 40Source ↗ “It is agreed that additional study data would not provide further useful information for this procedure, and overall sufficient data are available for adolescents (≥12 years), thus this issue was not pursued from a nonclinical perspective.”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 41Source ↗