CarcinogenicityAccepted with a conditionBeyond the letter
Carcinogenic potential not assessed at FDA approval; 26-week Tg.rasH2 mouse study made a postmarketing requirement
“The carcinogenic potential of eplontersen has not been assessed. A 26-week carcinogenicity study in the tg.ratH2 mouse will be a post-marketing requirement.”
✓ VerifiedFDA integrated review, p. 49Source ↗ CarcinogenicityAcceptedBeyond the letter
No two-year rat carcinogenicity study; 26-week Tg.rasH2 mouse study plus data from same-sequence inotersen
Why: Negative Tg.rasH2 study, no genotoxic or proliferative findings, and inotersen (same sequence) not carcinogenic in rats · Class precedent · Weight of evidence
“Based on the negative outcome of this investigation in Tg.rasH2 mice, the lack of genotoxicity, immunosuppressive or proliferative findings in other toxicity studies, as well as the similarity of eplontersen and inotersen, which was not carcinogenic in rats, the lack of a 2 years rat carcinogenicity study is acceptable”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 36Source ↗ DARTAcceptedBeyond the letter
No rabbit embryo-fetal or pre/postnatal studies; combined mouse fertility/embryo-fetal study only, with inotersen data used instead
Why: Identical sequence to inotersen, which was tested in rabbit embryo-fetal and mouse pre/postnatal studies · Class precedent
“As eplontersen harbours the identical sequence of inotersen, which had been also tested with respect to embryo-foetal development in rabbits and in a pre-/postnatal development study in mice (see EPAR of “Tegsedi”, the previous CHMP advice is confirmed that further reproduction and developmental toxicity studies are not required for eplontersen.”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 37Source ↗