Nonclinical precedent Request an invite
Precedia/Gene therapy/Vyjuvek/Skipped studies

Vyjuvek: genotox, carcinogenicity and repro: done or skipped?

beremagene geperpavec · COL7A1 (HSV-1, topical)
Genotoxicity
Not conducted (HSV-1 does not integrate; negligible insertional mutagenesis)
“No traditional genotoxicity studies were performed.”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 32Source ↗
Carcinogenicity
Not conducted; weight-of-evidence literature risk assessment
“No carcinogenicity studies were performed, and the applicant provided a weight of evidence risk assessment”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 32Source ↗
Instead of carcinogenicity
Weight-of-evidence risk assessment from a literature search up to July 2024; no association of HSV-1 infection with cancer
“No carcinogenicity studies were performed, and the applicant provided a weight of evidence risk assessment, based on a literature search up to July 2024. This did not identify any association or risk factor identification for HSV-1 infection and cancer.”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 32Source ↗
Instead of genotoxicity
Not stated in public reviews
Not reported in the public reviews. Reviewers summarise selectively, so this usually means it wasn't discussed publicly, not that it wasn't studied.
DRG histopathology
Not stated in public reviews
Not reported in the public reviews. Reviewers summarise selectively, so this usually means it wasn't discussed publicly, not that it wasn't studied.
Reproductive & developmental
Not conducted (acceptable given product characteristics and safety profile)
“Animal reproductive and developmental toxicity (DART) studies were not conducted with VYJUVEK.”
✓ VerifiedFDA pharmacology/toxicology review, p. 2Source ↗
Safety pharmacology
Not conducted (locally administered, limited distribution)
“No safety pharmacology studies with KB-103 were performed.”
✓ VerifiedFDA pharmacology/toxicology review, p. 24Source ↗
Genotox: Ames
Not conducted (non-integrating HSV-1 vector; low insertional mutagenesis risk)
“No genotoxicity studies with VYJUVEK were performed because HSV-1 does not integrate into or disrupt the host genome; therefore, the risk of insertional mutagenesis of KB103 is low.”
✓ VerifiedFDA pharmacology/toxicology review, p. 32Source ↗
Genotox: in vitro mammalian
Not conducted (non-integrating HSV-1 vector; low insertional mutagenesis risk)
“No genotoxicity studies with VYJUVEK were performed because HSV-1 does not integrate into or disrupt the host genome; therefore, the risk of insertional mutagenesis of KB103 is low.”
✓ VerifiedFDA pharmacology/toxicology review, p. 32Source ↗
Genotox: in vivo
Not conducted (non-integrating HSV-1 vector; low insertional mutagenesis risk)
“No genotoxicity studies with VYJUVEK were performed because HSV-1 does not integrate into or disrupt the host genome; therefore, the risk of insertional mutagenesis of KB103 is low.”
✓ VerifiedFDA pharmacology/toxicology review, p. 32Source ↗
Carcinogenicity model
Not conducted; weight-of-evidence literature risk assessment instead
“No carcinogenicity studies were performed, and the applicant provided a weight of evidence risk assessment, based on a literature search up to July 2024.”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 32Source ↗
Carcinogenicity timing
Not required (no carcinogenic risk indicated by data for KB103 and wild-type HSV-1)
“No carcinogenicity/tumorigenicity studies with VYJUVEK were performed because available data for both KB103 and wild-type HSV-1 do not indicate a carcinogenic risk in humans.”
✓ VerifiedFDA pharmacology/toxicology review, p. 32Source ↗
hERG / QT
Not conducted (no safety pharmacology studies)
“No safety pharmacology studies with KB-103 were performed.”
✓ VerifiedFDA pharmacology/toxicology review, p. 24Source ↗

Email me this as a cited memo

Skipped studies for Vyjuvek, each with the regulator's own words, the page and a link. Ready to paste into a briefing document or send to your team.

Same question, other gene therapies

Adstiladrin

nadofaragene firadenovec · IFN-alpha2b (adenovirus, intravesical)
Not conducted for rAd-IFN; conducted for excipient Syn3 only (Ames and chromosome aberration, negative)

Beqvez

fidanacogene elaparvovec · Factor IX
Not conducted (classical); vector integration site analysis in dog and NHP liver instead

Casgevy

exagamglogene autotemcel · BCL11A enhancer (CRISPR-Cas9, ex vivo HSC)
No conventional studies; specialized on-/off-target editing (GUIDE-seq, in silico, hybrid capture) and chromosomal aberration assessments

Elevidys

delandistrogene moxeparvovec · Micro-dystrophin
Not conducted (low-frequency random AAV integration per literature)

Fayuvi

rebisufligene etisparvovec · SGSH (AAV9)
Not conducted; weight-of-evidence risk assessment used

Genglycos

pariglasgene brecaparvovec · G6PC (AAV8)
Not conducted (low AAV integration risk); vector integration assessed in germline transmission study

Glybera

alipogene tiparvovec · LPL (AAV1)
Not conducted (standard tests not relevant); integration studies (LAM-PCR, nrLAM-PCR) instead

Hemgenix

etranacogene dezaparvovec · Factor IX
Not conducted as standard battery; integration site analysis (LAM-PCR) in mouse and NHP liver showed low random integration

Imlygic

talimogene laherparepvec · GM-CSF (oncolytic HSV-1)
Not conducted (ICH S6(R1))

Itvisma

onasemnogene abeparvovec (intrathecal) · SMN1 (AAV9, intrathecal)
Not conducted (single administration, known product characteristics, class safety profile)

Kebilidi

eladocagene exuparvovec · AADC
Not conducted (agreed with CHMP; low integration risk in post-mitotic neurons)

Kresladi

marnetegragene autotemcel · ITGB2 (LVV, ex vivo HSC)
Integration site analyses only (mouse and human transduced cells); no standard genotoxicity battery

Lenmeldy

atidarsagene autotemcel · ARSA (LVV, ex vivo HSC)
Conducted: integration site analysis, in vitro immortalization assay, tumor-prone Cdkn2a-/- mouse; no insertional transformation

Luxturna

voretigene neparvovec · RPE65
Not conducted (AAV low integration frequency; limited systemic exposure)

Lyfgenia

lovotibeglogene autotemcel · HBB T87Q (LVV, ex vivo HSC)
Insertional mutagenesis assessed: in vitro immortalization (IVIM) assay and integration site analyses; low risk

Otarmeni

lunsotogene parvec · OTOF (AAV, intracochlear)
Not conducted (low AAV insertional mutagenesis risk; limited distribution beyond inner ear)

Papzimeos

zopapogene imadenovec · HPV6/11 antigens (gorilla adenovirus)
Not conducted (non-integrating, replication-incompetent adenovector; no insertional mutagenesis)

Roctavian

valoctocogene roxaparvovec · Factor VIII
Not conducted (literature on AAV); NHP liver integration site analysis: 1.55x10^-3 IS/cell, no clonal expansion

Skysona

elivaldogene autotemcel · ABCD1 (LVV, ex vivo HSC)
Standard genotox not relevant; insertional mutagenesis assessed by in vitro immortalization assay and integration site analysis

Strimvelis

autologous CD34+ cells transduced with ADA (no INN) · ADA (gamma-retroviral, ex vivo HSC)
Not conducted (conventional assays cannot detect insertional events)

Tudriqev

vusolimogene oderparepvec · GALV-GP + GM-CSF (oncolytic HSV-1)
Not conducted (not warranted based on product characteristics and safety profile)

Waskyra

etuvetidigene autotemcel · WAS (LVV, ex vivo HSC)
Conventional mutagenicity not conducted; IVIM assay, vector insertion site analysis and VITA performed, no genotoxic potential

Zevaskyn

prademagene zamikeracel · COL7A1 (RV-modified keratinocyte sheets)
Not conducted (integration site analysis in transduced RDEB keratinocytes instead; no clonality or oncogene preference)

Zolgensma

onasemnogene abeparvovec · SMN1
Not conducted (low random rAAV integration per literature)

Zynteglo

betibeglogene autotemcel · HBB T87Q (LVV, ex vivo HSC)
Insertional mutagenesis assessed instead of standard genotox: in vitro immortalization assay (low potential) and integration site analysis (no clonal dominance)

Summary across all 26 gene therapies →