No conventional studies; specialized on-/off-target editing (GUIDE-seq, in silico, hybrid capture) and chromosomal aberration assessments
“No evidence of off-target editing was observed for in-silico and GUIDE-seq identified candidate off-target sites which were assessed by hybrid capture sequencing analyses.”
✓ VerifiedFDA pharmacology/toxicology review, p. 3Source ↗
Carcinogenicity
Not conducted (tumorigenicity evaluated in 20-week NSG study; no tumors)
“No carcinogenicity studies were conducted with CTX001.”
✓ VerifiedFDA pharmacology/toxicology review, p. 34Source ↗
Instead of carcinogenicity
Combined GLP toxicity and tumorigenicity study of 20 weeks in NSG mice plus specialized genotoxicity assessments of off-target editing and translocations
“The toxicity of exa-cel has been evaluated in an in vivo combined GLP toxicity and tumorigenicity study with a duration of 20 weeks in NSG mice. In addition, a battery of specialized genotoxicity studies consisting of in silico and in vitro safety assessments were conducted to evaluate the potential risks associated with off-target editing and chromosomal translocations.”
Not reported in the public reviews. Reviewers summarise selectively, so this usually means it wasn't discussed publicly, not that it wasn't studied.
DRG histopathology
Not applicable: ex vivo HSC product, no vector administered to patients
Reproductive & developmental
Not conducted (no reproductive organ findings, low gonadal distribution, non-integrating editing)
“No DART studies were conducted with CTX001.”
✓ VerifiedFDA pharmacology/toxicology review, p. 34Source ↗
Safety pharmacology
No separate studies; selected parameters assessed in GLP toxicity study with no effects
“However, selected safety pharmacology parameters, were investigated in the GLP toxicity study and no effects on CNS, cardiac, respiratory, renal or gastrointestinal systems were observed.”
Specialized in vitro assays in edited CD34+ cells: no off-target editing (GUIDE-seq, hybrid capture) and no chromosomal aberrations (karyotyping, LR-PCR)
“No evidence of off-target editing was observed for in-silico and GUIDE-seq identified candidate off-target sites which were assessed by hybrid capture sequencing analyses. No chromosomal aberrations for SPY101-RNP edited CD34+ hHSPCs from healthy donors were observed based on karyotyping, long-range PCR sequencing, and hybrid capture sequencing analyses.”
✓ VerifiedFDA pharmacology/toxicology review, p. 3Source ↗
Genotox: in vivo
In vivo indel percentage and editing spectrum in spleen and bone marrow of engrafted mice at Weeks 8 and 20: no differences versus input cells
“In addition to the % chimerism, also the average indel percentage and the editing spectrum were evaluated in spleen and BM samples of the recipient mice at Week 8 and Week 20 post-engraftment. The average indel percentage revealed no significant differences between the input cells and the samples collected from the recipient mice after 8 and 20 weeks of engraftment, respectively.”
Tumorigenicity in irradiated NSG mice, single IV dose followed 20 weeks: no tumor formation
“Mice received single IV administration of 1 x 106 cells/mouse and were followed for 20 weeks. There were no significant adverse findings or tumor formation.”
✓ VerifiedFDA pharmacology/toxicology review, p. 2Source ↗
Carcinogenicity timing
Not conducted: not warranted (product characteristics and safety profile)
“Developmental and reproductive toxicity studies and carcinogenicity studies were not conducted with CASGEVY. These studies are not warranted based on the characteristics and safety profile of the product.”
✓ VerifiedFDA pharmacology/toxicology review, p. 3Source ↗
hERG / QT
No safety pharmacology studies conducted
“There were no safety pharmacology studies conducted with CASGEVY.”
✓ VerifiedFDA pharmacology/toxicology review, p. 26Source ↗
betibeglogene autotemcel · HBB T87Q (LVV, ex vivo HSC)
Insertional mutagenesis assessed instead of standard genotox: in vitro immortalization assay (low potential) and integration site analysis (no clonal dominance)