Nonclinical precedent Request an invite
Precedia/Gene therapy/Glybera/Skipped studies

Glybera: genotox, carcinogenicity and repro: done or skipped?

alipogene tiparvovec · LPL (AAV1)
Genotoxicity
Not conducted (standard tests not relevant); integration studies (LAM-PCR, nrLAM-PCR) instead
“Standard genotoxicity studies, as applied to a conventional chemical drug, are not relevant for this type of product and were not performed.”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 28Source ↗
Carcinogenicity
Not conducted; integration analyses argued sufficient (97% episomal, <2% near-random integration)
“Carcinogenicity studies have not been conducted. The applicant argues that the studies conducted to assess integration are sufficient to address risk of carcinogenicity.”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 29Source ↗
Instead of carcinogenicity
Integration analysis: no risky hotspots or clonal skewing, integration events detectable (<2%) and close to random
“Integration analysis did not identify any risky integration hotspots or clonal skewing that might indicate risk of mutagenesis on insertion of AMT-011 into the genome. Integration events were detectable (<2%) but were close to random in the genome.”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 29Source ↗
Instead of genotoxicity
Not stated in public reviews
Not reported in the public reviews. Reviewers summarise selectively, so this usually means it wasn't discussed publicly, not that it wasn't studied.
DRG histopathology
Not stated in public reviews
Not reported in the public reviews. Reviewers summarise selectively, so this usually means it wasn't discussed publicly, not that it wasn't studied.
Reproductive & developmental
Mouse repro study: no effects on female reproduction or fetal development; male breeding study showed no paternal germline transmission
“Reproductive toxicity was studied in pregnant mice in whom no effects of female reproduction or fetal development were detected.”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 30Source ↗
Safety pharmacology
Not stated in public reviews
Not reported in the public reviews. Reviewers summarise selectively, so this usually means it wasn't discussed publicly, not that it wasn't studied.
Genotox: Ames
Not conducted (standard genotoxicity tests not relevant for this product)
“Standard genotoxicity studies, as applied to a conventional chemical drug, are not relevant for this type of product and were not performed.”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 28Source ↗
Genotox: in vitro mammalian
Not conducted (standard genotoxicity tests not relevant for this product)
“Standard genotoxicity studies, as applied to a conventional chemical drug, are not relevant for this type of product and were not performed.”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 28Source ↗
Genotox: in vivo
Not conducted (standard genotoxicity tests not relevant for this product)
“Standard genotoxicity studies, as applied to a conventional chemical drug, are not relevant for this type of product and were not performed.”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 28Source ↗
Carcinogenicity model
Not conducted; replaced by vector integration analyses: 97% of vector not integrated (episomal)
“Studies using techniques to selectively digest genomic DNA showed that the majority (97%) of AMT-011 is not integrated into the genome, implying their presence episomally.”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 29Source ↗
Carcinogenicity timing
Not conducted: no study design accepted as relevant to assess insertional mutagenesis and oncogenicity
“In vivo carcinogenicity studies have not been conducted. The applicant argued that there is no existing study design that would be accepted as relevant to assess insertional mutagenesis and the risk of oncogenicity”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 32Source ↗
hERG / QT
Not stated in public reviews
Not reported in the public reviews. Reviewers summarise selectively, so this usually means it wasn't discussed publicly, not that it wasn't studied.

Same question, other gene therapies

Adstiladrin

nadofaragene firadenovec · IFN-alpha2b (adenovirus, intravesical)
Not conducted for rAd-IFN; conducted for excipient Syn3 only (Ames and chromosome aberration, negative)

Beqvez

fidanacogene elaparvovec · Factor IX
Not conducted (classical); vector integration site analysis in dog and NHP liver instead

Casgevy

exagamglogene autotemcel · BCL11A enhancer (CRISPR-Cas9, ex vivo HSC)
No conventional studies; specialized on-/off-target editing (GUIDE-seq, in silico, hybrid capture) and chromosomal aberration assessments

Elevidys

delandistrogene moxeparvovec · Micro-dystrophin
Not conducted (low-frequency random AAV integration per literature)

Fayuvi

rebisufligene etisparvovec · SGSH (AAV9)
Not conducted; weight-of-evidence risk assessment used

Genglycos

pariglasgene brecaparvovec · G6PC (AAV8)
Not conducted (low AAV integration risk); vector integration assessed in germline transmission study

Hemgenix

etranacogene dezaparvovec · Factor IX
Not conducted as standard battery; integration site analysis (LAM-PCR) in mouse and NHP liver showed low random integration

Imlygic

talimogene laherparepvec · GM-CSF (oncolytic HSV-1)
Not conducted (ICH S6(R1))

Itvisma

onasemnogene abeparvovec (intrathecal) · SMN1 (AAV9, intrathecal)
Not conducted (single administration, known product characteristics, class safety profile)

Kebilidi

eladocagene exuparvovec · AADC
Not conducted (agreed with CHMP; low integration risk in post-mitotic neurons)

Kresladi

marnetegragene autotemcel · ITGB2 (LVV, ex vivo HSC)
Integration site analyses only (mouse and human transduced cells); no standard genotoxicity battery

Lenmeldy

atidarsagene autotemcel · ARSA (LVV, ex vivo HSC)
Conducted: integration site analysis, in vitro immortalization assay, tumor-prone Cdkn2a-/- mouse; no insertional transformation

Luxturna

voretigene neparvovec · RPE65
Not conducted (AAV low integration frequency; limited systemic exposure)

Lyfgenia

lovotibeglogene autotemcel · HBB T87Q (LVV, ex vivo HSC)
Insertional mutagenesis assessed: in vitro immortalization (IVIM) assay and integration site analyses; low risk

Otarmeni

lunsotogene parvec · OTOF (AAV, intracochlear)
Not conducted (low AAV insertional mutagenesis risk; limited distribution beyond inner ear)

Papzimeos

zopapogene imadenovec · HPV6/11 antigens (gorilla adenovirus)
Not conducted (non-integrating, replication-incompetent adenovector; no insertional mutagenesis)

Roctavian

valoctocogene roxaparvovec · Factor VIII
Not conducted (literature on AAV); NHP liver integration site analysis: 1.55x10^-3 IS/cell, no clonal expansion

Skysona

elivaldogene autotemcel · ABCD1 (LVV, ex vivo HSC)
Standard genotox not relevant; insertional mutagenesis assessed by in vitro immortalization assay and integration site analysis

Strimvelis

autologous CD34+ cells transduced with ADA (no INN) · ADA (gamma-retroviral, ex vivo HSC)
Not conducted (conventional assays cannot detect insertional events)

Tudriqev

vusolimogene oderparepvec · GALV-GP + GM-CSF (oncolytic HSV-1)
Not conducted (not warranted based on product characteristics and safety profile)

Vyjuvek

beremagene geperpavec · COL7A1 (HSV-1, topical)
Not conducted (HSV-1 does not integrate; negligible insertional mutagenesis)

Waskyra

etuvetidigene autotemcel · WAS (LVV, ex vivo HSC)
Conventional mutagenicity not conducted; IVIM assay, vector insertion site analysis and VITA performed, no genotoxic potential

Zevaskyn

prademagene zamikeracel · COL7A1 (RV-modified keratinocyte sheets)
Not conducted (integration site analysis in transduced RDEB keratinocytes instead; no clonality or oncogene preference)

Zolgensma

onasemnogene abeparvovec · SMN1
Not conducted (low random rAAV integration per literature)

Zynteglo

betibeglogene autotemcel · HBB T87Q (LVV, ex vivo HSC)
Insertional mutagenesis assessed instead of standard genotox: in vitro immortalization assay (low potential) and integration site analysis (no clonal dominance)

Summary across all 26 gene therapies →