Conducted: Ames, human lymphocyte chromosome aberration, rat micronucleus; all negative
“Givosiran was not mutagenic in the in vitro bacterial reverse mutation test or clastogenic in the in vitro chromosomal aberrations assay in human peripheral blood lymphocytes or in the in vivo bone marrow micronucleus assay in rats.”
✓ VerifiedFDA multi-discipline review, p. 28Source ↗
Carcinogenicity
Conducted: 26-week Tg.rasH2 mouse negative; 2-year rat (post-approval) showed hepatocellular adenomas in males at 100 mg/kg
“A statistically significant increase in hepatocellular adenomas occurred in males at 100 mg/kg/month, the clinical significance of which is uncertain.”
Not reported in the public reviews. Reviewers summarise selectively, so this usually means it wasn't discussed publicly, not that it wasn't studied.
Instead of genotoxicity
Not stated in public reviews
Not reported in the public reviews. Reviewers summarise selectively, so this usually means it wasn't discussed publicly, not that it wasn't studied.
DRG histopathology
Not stated in public reviews
Not reported in the public reviews. Reviewers summarise selectively, so this usually means it wasn't discussed publicly, not that it wasn't studied.
Reproductive & developmental
Full DART: rat fertility/EFD, rabbit EFD (postimplantation loss with maternal toxicity), rat PPND; no malformations
“Givosiran showed marked maternal toxicity in rabbits (including mean maternal body weight loss) and resulted in increased post-implantation loss as a result of increased early resorptions and a low incidence of skeletal variations.”
Standalone GLP CV/respiratory telemetry study in monkey (single 150 mg/kg SC); no clear effects
“A safety pharmacology study assessed the effects of a single subcutaneous dose of 150 mg/kg givosiran on cardiovascular and respiratory function in male telemetered cynomolgus monkeys.”
✓ VerifiedFDA multi-discipline review, p. 26Source ↗
Genotox: Ames
Bacterial reverse mutation: negative
“Givosiran was not mutagenic in the in vitro bacterial reverse mutation test or clastogenic in the in vitro chromosomal aberrations assay in human peripheral blood lymphocytes or in the in vivo bone marrow micronucleus assay in rats.”
✓ VerifiedFDA multi-discipline review, p. 28Source ↗
Genotox: in vitro mammalian
Chromosomal aberration in human peripheral blood lymphocytes: negative
“Givosiran was not mutagenic in the in vitro bacterial reverse mutation test or clastogenic in the in vitro chromosomal aberrations assay in human peripheral blood lymphocytes or in the in vivo bone marrow micronucleus assay in rats.”
✓ VerifiedFDA multi-discipline review, p. 28Source ↗
Genotox: in vivo
Rat bone marrow micronucleus: negative
“Givosiran was not mutagenic in the in vitro bacterial reverse mutation test or clastogenic in the in vitro chromosomal aberrations assay in human peripheral blood lymphocytes or in the in vivo bone marrow micronucleus assay in rats.”
✓ VerifiedFDA multi-discipline review, p. 28Source ↗
Carcinogenicity model
Sprague Dawley rat, SC every 28 days up to 89 weeks: hepatocellular adenomas in males at 100 mg/kg/month
“In a carcinogenicity study in Sprague Dawley rats administered 25, 50, or 100 mg/kg givosiran by subcutaneous injection every 28 days for up to 89 weeks (males) or 85 weeks (females), givosiran doses in rats were 2, 3, and 6 times, respectively, the MRHD based on body surface area. A statistically significant increase in hepatocellular adenomas occurred in males at 100 mg/kg/month, the clinical significance of which is uncertain.”
26-week Tg-rasH2 mouse completed (negative); 2-year Sprague Dawley rat ongoing at approval
“There was no evidence of carcinogenicity in the 26-week conducted in f Tg-rasH2 mice. A longer, 2-year carcinogenicity study in Sprague Dawley rats (AS1-GLP18-007), currently ongoing, will be submitted upon its completion.”
“A safety pharmacology study assessed the effects of a single subcutaneous dose of 150 mg/kg givosiran on cardiovascular and respiratory function in male telemetered cynomolgus monkeys. Givosiran produced no clear drug-related effects on cardiovascular and respiratory function under the conditions tested.”
✓ VerifiedFDA multi-discipline review, p. 26Source ↗