DARTAcceptedBeyond the letter
No reproductive and developmental toxicity studies
Why: Biodistribution showed no migration or integration of eASC into reproductive organs · Pharmacology or kinetics
“Reproductive and developmental toxicity studies have not been performed for Alofisel because preclinical biodistribution studies indicated no migration and integration of eASC into reproductive organs following administration of eASC via different routes. This was considered acceptable by the CAT.”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 24Source ↗ Safety pharmacologyAcceptedBeyond the letter
No cardiovascular or respiratory safety pharmacology studies; CNS assessed by FOB in athymic rats only
“Cardiovascular or respiratory safety pharmacology studies were not performed for eASC which was considered acceptable by the CAT.”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 21Source ↗ Efficacy modelAcceptedBeyond the letter
No anal fistula model; TNBS colitis model used for proof-of-concept
Why: Agreed in CHMP scientific advice; colitis model showed effect in an inflamed gut · Other reason
“In vivo, no model for anal fistulas was used to provide proof-of-concept data. This was agreed by the CHMP during the 2011 scientific advice.”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 26Source ↗ “Instead, an experimental model of colitis was used to show the effect of eASC in an inflamed gut and the data provide evidence for proof-of-concept in this model.”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 26Source ↗ SpeciesVerdict not stated
Toxicology, biodistribution and tumourigenicity in immunocompromised athymic rats rather than standard species
Why: Minimise immune recognition and rejection of human eASC and extend their persistence
“The applicant has chosen immunocompromised athymic rats to perform the biodistribution, toxicology and tumourigenicity studies. The applicant considers that this was done in order to minimize the immune recognition and potential rejection of human eASC in the experimental animal models and to extend Cx601 persistence”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 19Source ↗