SpeciesAccepted
No nonclinical toxicology studies: no relevant animal species or model
Why: Acceptable clinical safety profile; lack of relevant animal species or models · No relevant species · Within the guideline · Human data
“Based on the acceptable clinical safety profile of RVT-802 and the lack of relevant animal species/models, no nonclinical toxicology studies with RVT-802 were performed.”
✓ VerifiedFDA pharmacology/toxicology review, p. 2Source ↗ “PHARMACOLOGY/TOXICOLOGY RECOMMENDATION: There were no nonclinical deficiencies identified in this submission.”
✓ VerifiedFDA pharmacology/toxicology review, p. 2Source ↗ DARTAcceptedBeyond the letter
No DART studies; published mouse thymectomy literature used instead
Why: Published thymectomy and thymus-grafting data in mice indicate minimal DART risk · Weight of evidence
“While the thymus product administered is not identical to RVT-802, these data indicate that the risk of DART after RVT-802 transplantation in humans appears to be minimal.”
✓ VerifiedFDA pharmacology/toxicology review, p. 21Source ↗ CarcinogenicityAcceptedBeyond the letter
No carcinogenicity or tumorigenicity studies; published thymus-transplant studies in tumour-bearing mice used instead
Why: Published mouse data combined with existing clinical safety data indicate minimal risk · Weight of evidence · Human data
“Although the thymus products administered were not identical to RVT-802 and the studies were conducted in tumor-bearing mice (which does not reflect the clinical scenario), these data combined with the existing clinical safety data for RVT-802, indicate that the risk of carcinogenicity after RVT-802 transplantation in humans appears to be minimal.”
✓ VerifiedFDA pharmacology/toxicology review, p. 22Source ↗