OtherAcceptedBeyond the letter
ICH toxicology package (chronic toxicity, genotoxicity, carcinogenicity, DART, safety pharmacology, immunotoxicity) not conducted; partly covered by device biocompatibility testing
Why: Nature of the product and extensive clinical experience in the cutaneous indications · Human data · Other reason
“The toxicology study designs as discussed in the International Conference on Harmonisation (ICH) Safety (‘S’) guidelines, consisting of pharmacokinetics, acute toxicology, chronic toxicology, genotoxicity, carcinogenicity, reproductive and developmental toxicity, safety pharmacology, and immunotoxicity”
✓ VerifiedFDA pharmacology/toxicology review, p. 49Source ↗ “were not conducted due to the nature of Apligraf® and the extensive clinical experience in the cutaneous indications. In addition, some aspects of these studies were captured in the biocompatibility testing.”
✓ VerifiedFDA pharmacology/toxicology review, p. 49Source ↗ OtherAcceptedBeyond the letter
No additional preclinical studies on conversion to the BLA pathway; relied on the identical PMA-approved cutaneous product
Why: Clinical data already existed; identical product approved under a PMA · Human data
“Although this product was converted to a BLA regulatory pathway, additional preclinical studies were not conducted because clinical data existed by that time.”
✓ VerifiedFDA pharmacology/toxicology review, p. 48Source ↗ Efficacy modelQuestioned
Nude mouse wound model showed skin-graft behaviour, not the proposed healing by secondary intention; species difference not explored
“Although the sponsor’s hypothesis is that Apligraf® functions to enhance wound healing by secondary intention, the results from the in vivo studies in the murine wound models did not provide direct evidence to support this position.”
✓ VerifiedFDA pharmacology/toxicology review, p. 49Source ↗ OtherVerdict not stated
Alloimmune response by indirect allorecognition not evaluated
“The potential for Apligraf® to induce an alloimmune response by indirect allorecognition was not evaluated.”
✓ VerifiedFDA pharmacology/toxicology review, p. 49Source ↗