OtherAcceptedBeyond the letter
No preclinical studies of any kind with the product; relied on prior commercial human use and published literature
Why: Prior commercial human experience; no suitable animal model; autologous, minimally manipulated cells unlikely to become tumorigenic · Human data · Low-risk modality · No relevant species
“The BLA states that due to this previous commercial experience in humans, and due to the lack of a ‘suitable’ preclinical animal model for rhytids, no preclinical studies using IT were performed.”
✓ VerifiedFDA pharmacology/toxicology review, p. 3Source ↗ “The pharmacology/toxicology review of the original IND submission supported the sponsor’s decision, noting that these cells are autologous, minimally manipulated, highly unlikely to change in phenotype, dedifferentiate, migrate or become tumorigenic (see Attachment I).”
✓ VerifiedFDA pharmacology/toxicology review, p. 24Source ↗ OtherCriticised but acceptedBeyond the letter
Reviewer-identified gaps (cell survival, tissue remodeling, tumorigenicity) not studied in animals; human biopsies recommended instead
Why: Dermal changes to be assessed via biopsies in human subjects · Human data
“This reviewer’s recommendations are as follows: 1) assessment of any changes in the dermal architecture of the injected wrinkle should be obtained via biopsies in the human subjects; however, if additional questions arise based on the biopsy data, the conduct of a murine xenograft study could be considered to potentially investigate these concerns”
✓ VerifiedFDA pharmacology/toxicology review, p. 26Source ↗