SpeciesAcceptedBeyond the letter
No toxicology studies with the product; no relevant animal model, murine surrogate CAR-T used for pharmacology
Why: Type of product and limitations of available animal models · No relevant species
“Single-dose toxicology studies in animals were not performed by the Applicant due to the lack of a relevant animal model.”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 27Source ↗ “The non-clinical development package provided for KTE-C19 was limited due to the type of product and the limitations of animal models available for investigating pharmacodynamics, pharmacokinetics, and toxicity aspects of KTE-C19, but it was considered adequate.”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 36Source ↗ DARTAcceptedBeyond the letter
No fertility, reproduction or development studies
Why: Type of product, target antigen expression pattern and lack of a relevant animal model · No relevant species · Pharmacology or kinetics
“No studies have been conducted to evaluate the effects of YESCARTA on fertility, reproduction and development. This is acceptable based on the type of product, the expression pattern of the target antigen and the lack of a relevant animal model.”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 35Source ↗ BiodistributionAccepted
Germline transmission risk of the CAR construct not addressed nonclinically
Why: EMA germline transmission guideline considers the risk low for genetically modified human cells · Within the guideline · Low-risk modality
“The risk of inadvertent germline transmission of the CD19 CAR construct has not been addressed; however, the Guideline on non-clinical testing for inadvertent germline transmission of gene transfer vectors (EMEA/273974/2005) indicates that the risk of germline transmission associated with the administration of genetically modified human cells is considered to be low”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 35Source ↗ CarcinogenicityVerdict not stated
No genotoxicity or carcinogenicity/tumorigenicity studies; published literature review on retrovirally transduced T cells instead
Why: Literature suggests T cells are relatively resistant to malignant transformation by retroviral vectors · Weight of evidence · Human data
“To address the risk of retroviral vector insertional mutagenesis and potential carcinogenicity/tumorigenicity the applicant performed a review of published nonclinical and clinical information reported for T cells transduced with retroviral vectors. The data suggest that T cells are relatively resistant to malignant transformation by retroviral vectors.”
✓ VerifiedFDA pharmacology/toxicology review, p. 3Source ↗