SpeciesAccepted
No GLP-compliant formal toxicology studies and no repeat-dose study; no relevant animal species
Why: No relevant animal model; single IV infusion of a patient-specific product unsuitable for immune-competent animals · No relevant species · Within the guideline
“Similar to the pharmacokinetic evaluation, the non-clinical safety evaluation of cilta-cel was limited due to the lack of a relevant animal model. Therefore, no GLP-compliant formal toxicology studies were performed.”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 37Source ↗ “The lack of repeat-dose toxicity studies is acceptable based on the fact that cilta-cel will be administered as a single IV infusion, and since cilta-cel is a patient specific product which is not appropriate to administer to immune competent animals.”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 37Source ↗ GLPVerdict not stated
Only a non-GLP pilot in cynomolgus monkeys with autologous surrogate CAR-T cells, without control groups
“It is unclear if changes in complete blood counts were related to cyclophosphamide pretreatment or NHP cilta-cel because the study did not include cyclophosphamide only and/or vehicle control groups.”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 34Source ↗ GenotoxicityCriticised but acceptedBeyond the letter
No classical genotoxicity studies; integration site analysis on final product rather than ex vivo cells
Why: Mature T cells are highly resistant to oncogenic transformation, as documented in the literature · Low-risk modality
“Although the use of ex vivo cilta-cel would have been more suitable for the detection of dominant cell clones, the use of final product for integration analysis is considered acceptable based on the high resistance of mature T cells to oncogene transformation, which is well documented in the literature.”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 38Source ↗ BiodistributionAccepted
Inadvertent germline transmission risk not addressed by the applicant
Why: EMA guideline: germline transmission risk from genetically modified human cells is low and animal testing not recommended · Within the guideline · Low-risk modality
“The risk of inadvertent germline transmission of the cilta-cel has not been addressed by the applicant. However, the Guideline on non-clinical testing for inadvertent germline transmission of gene transfer vectors, EMEA/273974/2005, indicates that the risk of germline transmission associated with the administration of genetically modified human cells is considered low”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 38Source ↗ DARTAcceptedBeyond the letter
No reproductive and developmental toxicity studies
Why: Product type, target antigen expression pattern and no relevant animal model · No relevant species · Pharmacology or kinetics
“The lack of any non-clinical reproductive and developmental toxicity studies is acceptable based on the type of product, the expression pattern of the target antigen and the lack of a relevant animal model.”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 38Source ↗