SpeciesVerdict not stated
No in vivo single- or repeat-dose toxicity studies; no appropriate animal model for human TCR-engineered T cells
Why: No appropriate animal model for human TCR-engineered T cells · No relevant species
“Standard in vivo single-dose or repeat-dose toxicity studies were not conducted with afamitresgene autoleucel due to the lack of appropriate animal models for testing of human TCR engineered T-cells.”
✓ VerifiedFDA multi-discipline review, p. 39Source ↗ DARTAccepted with a conditionBeyond the letter
No reproductive and developmental toxicity studies despite MAGE-A4 expression in testes and placenta
Why: Product characteristics and safety profile; risk mitigated via labelling and routine pharmacovigilance · No relevant species · Human data
“No animal reproductive and developmental toxicity studies were conducted with TECELRA which is acceptable based on the product characteristics and safety profile.”
✓ VerifiedFDA summary basis for approval, p. 13Source ↗ “In the post-marketing setting, this risk can be mitigated via labelling, and monitored via routine pharmacovigilance measures (follow-up and thorough evaluation of any reported pregnancy cases in the post-marketing setting).”
✓ VerifiedFDA multi-discipline review, p. 41Source ↗ Safety pharmacologyAcceptedBeyond the letter
No safety pharmacology studies
Why: No relevant animal models · No relevant species
“No safety pharmacology studies were conducted, as there are no relevant animal models for the nonclinical safety assessment of afamitresgene autoleucel. The FDA’s Assessment: [FDA concurs with the Applicant.]”
✓ VerifiedFDA multi-discipline review, p. 39Source ↗ CarcinogenicityAcceptedBeyond the letter
No genotoxicity or carcinogenicity studies; lentiviral vector integration site analysis instead
Why: Insertion site profile similar to other lentiviral vector products; no greater insertional oncogenesis risk expected · Class precedent · Weight of evidence
“Traditional in vitro and in vivo genotoxicity and carcinogenicity assessments were not conducted using TECELRA. However, vector integration site analysis demonstrated that the insertion site profile for the product was similar to other lentiviral vector products and was not expected to represent a greater risk for the development of insertional oncogenesis.”
✓ VerifiedFDA summary basis for approval, p. 13Source ↗