Not reported in the public reviews. Reviewers summarise selectively, so this usually means it wasn't discussed publicly, not that it wasn't studied.
Repeat-dose tox before first-in-human
Not stated in public reviews
Not reported in the public reviews. Reviewers summarise selectively, so this usually means it wasn't discussed publicly, not that it wasn't studied.
First-in-human starting dose
Antigen content of quadrivalent product matched licensed trivalent vaccine plus a second B strain; no separate dose-finding
“The quantity of each HA antigen and excipients of RIV4 was equivalent to that of the US licensed trivalent recombinant influenza vaccine manufactured by PSC with the addition of the second B strain.”
Rat, five weekly SC injections of RIV3; recovery phase not stated
“The pivotal repeat-dose toxicity study was conducted with the SC route. Results showed that five weekly SC injections with RIV3 were locally and systemically well tolerated in rats.”
GLP rat repeat-dose study, five weekly SC injections of RIV3; rat IM DART; single-dose, local tolerance studies
“The pivotal repeat-dose toxicity study was conducted with the SC route. Results showed that five weekly SC injections with RIV3 were locally and systemically well tolerated in rats.”
Rat (fertility, embryo-fetal and early postnatal development, combined study)
“In DART study conducted in female rats, three IM injections (31 and 12 days before mating and on Gestation Day 6) of RIV3 did not induce maternal toxicity, and there were no adverse effects on mating performance or fertility, embryo-foetal development (including an evaluation of teratogenicity) and an early post-natal development.”
Rat fertility, embryo-fetal and early postnatal study (three IM doses, pre-mating and GD6): no adverse effects
“In DART study conducted in female rats, three IM injections (31 and 12 days before mating and on Gestation Day 6) of RIV3 did not induce maternal toxicity, and there were no adverse effects on mating performance or fertility, embryo-foetal development (including an evaluation of teratogenicity) and an early post-natal development.”
“No genotoxicity and carcinogenicity studies were carried out in line with relevant guidelines. Studies evaluating genotoxicity and carcinogenicity are normally not required for viral vaccines.”
Not conducted (not normally required for viral vaccines; no adjuvant or novel excipients)
“Studies evaluating genotoxicity and carcinogenicity are normally not required for viral vaccines. Since no adjuvants or novel excipients are used in this product absence of those studies is considered acceptable.”
Not required: viral vaccine without adjuvant or novel excipients
“Studies evaluating genotoxicity and carcinogenicity are normally not required for viral vaccines. Since no adjuvants or novel excipients are used in this product absence of those studies is considered acceptable.”