Not conducted (no test models or relevant species); integration site analysis showed polyclonal products, no selective insertion
“Conventional genotoxicity studies were not conducted with afamitresgene autoleucel, due to the lack of appropriate test models and pharmacologically relevant species.”
✓ VerifiedFDA multi-discipline review, p. 40Source ↗
Carcinogenicity
Not conducted (no relevant animal models for human TCR-engineered T cells)
“Afamitresgene autoleucel is a human TCR engineered T-cell product, therefore conventional carcinogenicity studies were not performed due to the lack of relevant animal models.”
✓ VerifiedFDA multi-discipline review, p. 40Source ↗
Instead of carcinogenicity
Not stated in public reviews
Not reported in the public reviews. Reviewers summarise selectively, so this usually means it wasn't discussed publicly, not that it wasn't studied.
Instead of genotoxicity
Genomic insertion site analysis on products from five patients; no preferential integration near genes of concern
“A genomic insertion site analysis was performed on TECELRA products from five patients. There was no evidence for preferential integration near genes of concern.”
Not reported in the public reviews. Reviewers summarise selectively, so this usually means it wasn't discussed publicly, not that it wasn't studied.
Reproductive & developmental
Not conducted; theoretical testis/placenta risk (MAGE-A4 expression) judged mitigated by immune privilege, labeling, pharmacovigilance
“MAGE-A4 is known to be expressed in testes and placenta, and so there is a theoretical risk of embryotoxicity or toxicity to the testes.”
✓ VerifiedFDA multi-discipline review, p. 40Source ↗
Safety pharmacology
Not conducted; no relevant animal models
“No safety pharmacology studies were conducted, as there are no relevant animal models for the nonclinical safety assessment of afamitresgene autoleucel.”
✓ VerifiedFDA multi-discipline review, p. 39Source ↗
Genotox: Ames
Not conducted
“Conventional genotoxicity studies were not conducted with afamitresgene autoleucel, due to the lack of appropriate test models and pharmacologically relevant species.”
✓ VerifiedFDA multi-discipline review, p. 40Source ↗
Genotox: in vitro mammalian
Not conducted
“Conventional genotoxicity studies were not conducted with afamitresgene autoleucel, due to the lack of appropriate test models and pharmacologically relevant species.”
✓ VerifiedFDA multi-discipline review, p. 40Source ↗
Genotox: in vivo
Not conducted
“Conventional genotoxicity studies were not conducted with afamitresgene autoleucel, due to the lack of appropriate test models and pharmacologically relevant species.”
✓ VerifiedFDA multi-discipline review, p. 40Source ↗
Carcinogenicity model
Not conducted; vector integration site profile similar to other lentiviral products, no greater insertional oncogenesis risk expected
“However, vector integration site analysis demonstrated that the insertion site profile for the product was similar to other lentiviral vector products and was not expected to represent a greater risk for the development of insertional oncogenesis.”
✓ VerifiedFDA summary basis for approval, p. 13Source ↗
Carcinogenicity timing
Not conducted; no relevant animal models for a human TCR-engineered T-cell product
“Afamitresgene autoleucel is a human TCR engineered T-cell product, therefore conventional carcinogenicity studies were not performed due to the lack of relevant animal models.”
✓ VerifiedFDA multi-discipline review, p. 40Source ↗
hERG / QT
Not conducted (no relevant animal models for safety pharmacology)
“No safety pharmacology studies were conducted, as there are no relevant animal models for the nonclinical safety assessment of afamitresgene autoleucel.”
✓ VerifiedFDA multi-discipline review, p. 39Source ↗