Nonclinical precedent Request an invite

Polivy: what was done before first-in-human, and what came after?

polatuzumab vedotin · CD79b

Before first-in-human

First-in-human: where
Not stated in public reviews
Not reported in the public reviews. Reviewers summarise selectively, so this usually means it wasn't discussed publicly, not that it wasn't studied.
Repeat-dose tox before first-in-human
Not stated in public reviews
Not reported in the public reviews. Reviewers summarise selectively, so this usually means it wasn't discussed publicly, not that it wasn't studied.
First-in-human starting dose
Not stated in public reviews
Why it's blank

The public FDA and EMA reviews of Polivy don't say how the first human dose was chosen. That rationale is in the IND, which is confidential, so it is missing for most approved products.

How it's usually set for ADCs

ADCs with cytotoxic payloads follow the S9 rules (1/10 STD10 or 1/6 HNSTD of the ADC, scaled by body surface area). For immune agonists, a MABEL-based start dose should be considered instead.

“For example, for cytotoxic payloads, the starting clinical dose can be determined using either 1/10th the Severely Toxic Dose (STD) in 10% of animals (STD10) in rodents or 1/6th the Highest Non- Severely Toxic Dose (HNSTD) in non-rodents, for the ADC based on body surface area, depending on which is the most appropriate and/or sensitive species.”
✓ VerifiedICH 2018: ICH S9 Guideline: Nonclinical Evaluation for Anticancer…, p. 15Source ↗
This product's starting point

NOAEL / key findings: Rat STD10 10 mg/kg; monkey surrogate HNSTD 3 mg/kg; bone marrow, lymphoid, liver, male reproductive organs (testes irreversible) (EMA assessment report, p. 55)

Full method, every step sourced →

Longest repeat-dose systemic studies

Longest repeat-dose study and recovery
Cynomolgus monkey, polatuzumab vedotin or surrogate ADC IV Q3W for 4 doses, with 9-week recovery
“In Cynomolgus monkeys, IV doses of 1, 3, and 5 mg/kg polatuzumab vedotin or 3 and 5 mg/kg of the surrogate ADC were administered Q3W for a total of 4 doses, followed by a 9-week recovery period.”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 36Source ↗
Pivotal GLP studies
Rat 4 weekly IV doses (6-week recovery); monkey Q3W x4 IV ADC and surrogate (9-week recovery); MMAE rat and monkey
“In Cynomolgus monkeys, IV doses of 1, 3, and 5 mg/kg polatuzumab vedotin or 3 and 5 mg/kg of the surrogate ADC were administered Q3W for a total of 4 doses, followed by a 9-week recovery period.”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 36Source ↗

DART package

Species: DART
Rat (MMAE embryo-fetal development only); no fertility study
“In an embryo-fetal developmental study, pregnant rats were given 2 intravenous doses of 0.2 mg/kg MMAE during the period of organogenesis on gestation Days 6 and 13.”
✓ VerifiedFDA pharmacology/toxicology review, p. 12Source ↗
Reproductive & developmental
No fertility study (ICH S9); MMAE rat EFD embryolethal and teratogenic; testicular toxicity in rat repeat-dose
“A designated fertility study was not conducted with polatuzumab vedotin or MMAE and is not needed for the proposed indication.”
✓ VerifiedFDA pharmacology/toxicology review, p. 12Source ↗
PPND / ePPND: when
No dedicated pre- and postnatal development study conducted
“No dedicated pre- and postnatal development studies have been conducted (see discussion on Non-Clinical aspects).”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 51Source ↗

Carcinogenicity

Species: carcinogenicity
Not conducted (not warranted for the indication)
“Carcinogenicity studies in animals have not been performed with polatuzumab vedotin or MMAE and are not warranted for the proposed indication.”
✓ VerifiedFDA pharmacology/toxicology review, p. 12Source ↗
Carcinogenicity model
Not conducted with polatuzumab vedotin or MMAE (not warranted for the indication)
“Carcinogenicity studies in animals have not been performed with polatuzumab vedotin or MMAE and are not warranted for the proposed indication.”
✓ VerifiedFDA pharmacology/toxicology review, p. 12Source ↗
Carcinogenicity timing
Not conducted with polatuzumab vedotin or MMAE; not warranted for the indication
“Carcinogenicity studies in animals have not been performed with polatuzumab vedotin or MMAE and are not warranted for the proposed indication.”
✓ VerifiedFDA pharmacology/toxicology review, p. 12Source ↗

Email me this as a cited memo

Tox package for Polivy, each with the regulator's own words, the page and a link. Ready to paste into a briefing document or send to your team.

Same question, other ADCs

Enhertu

fam-trastuzumab deruxtecan · HER2
Japan and US: multicenter first-in-human study (Study DS8201-A-J101)

Adcetris

brentuximab vedotin · CD30
Not stated in public reviews

Besponsa

inotuzumab ozogamicin · CD22
Not stated in public reviews

Datroway

datopotamab deruxtecan · Trop-2
Not stated in public reviews

Decnupaz

pivekimab sunirine · CD123
Not stated in public reviews

Elahere

mirvetuximab soravtansine · FRα
Not stated in public reviews

Emrelis

telisotuzumab vedotin · c-Met
Not stated in public reviews

Kadcyla

ado-trastuzumab emtansine · HER2
Not stated in public reviews

Mylotarg

gemtuzumab ozogamicin · CD33
Not stated in public reviews

Padcev

enfortumab vedotin · Nectin-4
Not stated in public reviews

Tivdak

tisotumab vedotin · Tissue factor
Not stated in public reviews

Trodelvy

sacituzumab govitecan · Trop-2
Not stated in public reviews

Zynlonta

loncastuximab tesirine · CD19
Not stated in public reviews

Summary across all 14 ADCs →