Nonclinical precedent Request an invite

Tivdak: what was done before first-in-human, and what came after?

tisotumab vedotin · Tissue factor

Before first-in-human

First-in-human: where
Not stated in public reviews
Not reported in the public reviews. Reviewers summarise selectively, so this usually means it wasn't discussed publicly, not that it wasn't studied.
Repeat-dose tox before first-in-human
Not stated in public reviews
Not reported in the public reviews. Reviewers summarise selectively, so this usually means it wasn't discussed publicly, not that it wasn't studied.
First-in-human starting dose
Not stated in public reviews
Why it's blank

The public FDA and EMA reviews of Tivdak don't say how the first human dose was chosen. That rationale is in the IND, which is confidential, so it is missing for most approved products.

How it's usually set for ADCs

ADCs with cytotoxic payloads follow the S9 rules (1/10 STD10 or 1/6 HNSTD of the ADC, scaled by body surface area). For immune agonists, a MABEL-based start dose should be considered instead.

“For example, for cytotoxic payloads, the starting clinical dose can be determined using either 1/10th the Severely Toxic Dose (STD) in 10% of animals (STD10) in rodents or 1/6th the Highest Non- Severely Toxic Dose (HNSTD) in non-rodents, for the ADC based on body surface area, depending on which is the most appropriate and/or sensitive species.”
✓ VerifiedICH 2018: ICH S9 Guideline: Nonclinical Evaluation for Anticancer…, p. 15Source ↗
This product's starting point

NOAEL / key findings: Monkey NOAEL 1 mg/kg (females; <1 mg/kg males), HNSTD 3 mg/kg; skin, bone marrow, eye, testes; skin deaths at 5 mg/kg (EMA assessment report, p. 50)

Full method, every step sourced →

Longest repeat-dose systemic studies

Longest repeat-dose study and recovery
13-week GLP cynomolgus monkey (IV every three weeks, five doses) with 6-week recovery
“In a 13-week GLP repeat-dose study with a 6-week recovery period tisotumab vedotin was administered i.v. at doses of 1, 3 or 5 mg/kg every three weeks on five occasions to cynomolgus monkeys.”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 43Source ↗
Pivotal GLP studies
13-week GLP monkey ADC (q3w IV, 6-week recovery); MMAE 4-week rat, 11-week monkey; 13-week monkey naked antibody
“In a 13-week GLP repeat-dose study with a 6-week recovery period tisotumab vedotin was administered i.v. at doses of 1, 3 or 5 mg/kg every three weeks on five occasions to cynomolgus monkeys.”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 43Source ↗

DART package

Species: DART
Rat (MMAE embryo-fetal development only); ADC reproductive organ effects assessed in monkey repeat-dose study
“The Applicant assessed the effects tisotumab vedotin on reproductive organs as part of the repeat-dose toxicology study in monkeys and provided results from an EFD study in rats evaluating the MMAE payload.”
✓ VerifiedFDA multi-discipline review, p. 35Source ↗
Reproductive & developmental
Not conducted with ADC (ICH S9); MMAE rat EFD teratogenic/embryolethal; male repro toxicity in monkey
“MMAE was teratogenic and embryo lethal when administered to pregnant rats via two intravenous doses of 0.2 mg/kg during the period of organogenesis on gestational days 6 and 13.”
✓ VerifiedFDA multi-discipline review, p. 35Source ↗
PPND / ePPND: when
No pre- and postnatal development study; not needed for advanced cancer (ICH S9)
“Fertility and early embryonic development and pre- and post-natal studies were not needed to support the proposed advanced cancer population in accordance with ICH S9.”
✓ VerifiedFDA multi-discipline review, p. 57Source ↗

Carcinogenicity

Species: carcinogenicity
Not conducted (ICH S9)
“Carcinogenicity studies were not conducted with tisotumab vedotin in accordance with ICH S9 guidance.”
✓ VerifiedFDA multi-discipline review, p. 34Source ↗
Carcinogenicity model
Not conducted (ICH S9)
“Carcinogenicity studies were not conducted with tisotumab vedotin in accordance with ICH S9 guidance.”
✓ VerifiedFDA multi-discipline review, p. 34Source ↗
Carcinogenicity timing
Not required for advanced cancer (ICH S9); FDA agreed
“The FDA agrees with the Applicant’s position; carcinogenicity studies are not warranted to support marketing for therapeutics intended to treat patients with advanced cancer in accordance with ICH S9.”
✓ VerifiedFDA multi-discipline review, p. 57Source ↗

Same question, other ADCs

Enhertu

fam-trastuzumab deruxtecan · HER2
Japan and US: multicenter first-in-human study (Study DS8201-A-J101)

Adcetris

brentuximab vedotin · CD30
Not stated in public reviews

Besponsa

inotuzumab ozogamicin · CD22
Not stated in public reviews

Datroway

datopotamab deruxtecan · Trop-2
Not stated in public reviews

Decnupaz

pivekimab sunirine · CD123
Not stated in public reviews

Elahere

mirvetuximab soravtansine · FRα
Not stated in public reviews

Emrelis

telisotuzumab vedotin · c-Met
Not stated in public reviews

Kadcyla

ado-trastuzumab emtansine · HER2
Not stated in public reviews

Mylotarg

gemtuzumab ozogamicin · CD33
Not stated in public reviews

Padcev

enfortumab vedotin · Nectin-4
Not stated in public reviews

Polivy

polatuzumab vedotin · CD79b
Not stated in public reviews

Trodelvy

sacituzumab govitecan · Trop-2
Not stated in public reviews

Zynlonta

loncastuximab tesirine · CD19
Not stated in public reviews

Summary across all 14 ADCs →