Nonclinical precedent Request an invite

Trodelvy: what was done before first-in-human, and what came after?

sacituzumab govitecan · Trop-2

Before first-in-human

First-in-human: where
Not stated in public reviews
Not reported in the public reviews. Reviewers summarise selectively, so this usually means it wasn't discussed publicly, not that it wasn't studied.
Repeat-dose tox before first-in-human
Not stated in public reviews
Not reported in the public reviews. Reviewers summarise selectively, so this usually means it wasn't discussed publicly, not that it wasn't studied.
First-in-human starting dose
Not stated in public reviews
Why it's blank

The public FDA and EMA reviews of Trodelvy don't say how the first human dose was chosen. That rationale is in the IND, which is confidential, so it is missing for most approved products.

How it's usually set for ADCs

ADCs with cytotoxic payloads follow the S9 rules (1/10 STD10 or 1/6 HNSTD of the ADC, scaled by body surface area). For immune agonists, a MABEL-based start dose should be considered instead.

“For example, for cytotoxic payloads, the starting clinical dose can be determined using either 1/10th the Severely Toxic Dose (STD) in 10% of animals (STD10) in rodents or 1/6th the Highest Non- Severely Toxic Dose (HNSTD) in non-rodents, for the ADC based on body surface area, depending on which is the most appropriate and/or sensitive species.”
✓ VerifiedICH 2018: ICH S9 Guideline: Nonclinical Evaluation for Anticancer…, p. 15Source ↗
This product's starting point

NOAEL / key findings: Acute study HNSTD 60 mg/kg (no NOAEL); 13-week NOAEL/HNSTD 50 mg/kg; bone marrow, lymphoid, GI, liver, skin, female reproductive organs (EMA assessment report, p. 30)

Full method, every step sourced →

Longest repeat-dose systemic studies

Longest repeat-dose study and recovery
13-week cynomolgus monkey, IV once weekly for 2 weeks of each 3-week cycle, 4 cycles; recovery phase included
“In a 13-week toxicity study, monkeys were given sacituzumab govitecan at doses of 12.5, 25, and 50 mg/kg once weekly via a 1-hour infusion for 2 weeks of a 3-week cycle for 4 treatment cycles.”
✓ VerifiedFDA multi-discipline review, p. 176Source ↗
Pivotal GLP studies
GLP monkey 2-dose acute study (60, 120 mg/kg) and 13-week monkey study (days 1, 8 q21d x4 cycles, 6-week recovery), IV
“In a 13-week toxicity study, monkeys were given sacituzumab govitecan at doses of 12.5, 25, and 50 mg/kg once weekly via a 1-hour infusion for 2 weeks of a 3-week cycle for 4 treatment cycles.”
✓ VerifiedFDA multi-discipline review, p. 176Source ↗

DART package

Species: DART
Not conducted (not warranted per ICH S9)
“No embryo-fetal developmental toxicology studies were conducted or warranted to support this BLA submission, based on ICH S9.”
✓ VerifiedFDA multi-discipline review, p. 176Source ↗
Reproductive & developmental
Not conducted (ICH S9); SN-38 genotoxic so embryo-fetal toxicity expected; female repro organ findings in monkey
“No embryo-fetal developmental toxicology studies were conducted or warranted to support this BLA submission, based on ICH S9.”
✓ VerifiedFDA multi-discipline review, p. 176Source ↗
PPND / ePPND: when
No reproductive and developmental toxicity studies conducted or required (genotoxic SN-38 payload)
“There were no reproductive and developmental toxicology studies conducted with sacituzumab govitecan or required to support this BLA. Sacituzumab govitecan contains a genotoxic component, SN-38, and is toxic to rapidly dividing cells.”
✓ VerifiedFDA multi-discipline review, p. 193Source ↗

Carcinogenicity

Species: carcinogenicity
Not conducted (advanced cancer indication)
“No carcinogenicity studies were conducted or warranted to support this NDA, as the proposed indication was for advanced cancer.”
✓ VerifiedFDA multi-discipline review, p. 177Source ↗
Carcinogenicity model
Not conducted (advanced cancer indication)
“No carcinogenicity studies were conducted or warranted to support this NDA, as the proposed indication was for advanced cancer.”
✓ VerifiedFDA multi-discipline review, p. 177Source ↗
Carcinogenicity timing
Not required for advanced cancer (ICH S9)
“No assessment of carcinogenicity has been conducted in accordance with ICH S9 according to which carcinogenicity studies are not warranted to support marketing for therapeutics intended to treat patients with advanced cancer.”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 31Source ↗

Same question, other ADCs

Enhertu

fam-trastuzumab deruxtecan · HER2
Japan and US: multicenter first-in-human study (Study DS8201-A-J101)

Adcetris

brentuximab vedotin · CD30
Not stated in public reviews

Besponsa

inotuzumab ozogamicin · CD22
Not stated in public reviews

Datroway

datopotamab deruxtecan · Trop-2
Not stated in public reviews

Decnupaz

pivekimab sunirine · CD123
Not stated in public reviews

Elahere

mirvetuximab soravtansine · FRα
Not stated in public reviews

Emrelis

telisotuzumab vedotin · c-Met
Not stated in public reviews

Kadcyla

ado-trastuzumab emtansine · HER2
Not stated in public reviews

Mylotarg

gemtuzumab ozogamicin · CD33
Not stated in public reviews

Padcev

enfortumab vedotin · Nectin-4
Not stated in public reviews

Polivy

polatuzumab vedotin · CD79b
Not stated in public reviews

Tivdak

tisotumab vedotin · Tissue factor
Not stated in public reviews

Zynlonta

loncastuximab tesirine · CD19
Not stated in public reviews

Summary across all 14 ADCs →