Negative in Ames, in vitro chromosomal aberration and in vivo rat bone marrow micronucleus assays
“Crinecerfont was not mutagenic in the in vitro bacterial reverse mutation test (Ames) or clastogenic in the in vitro mammalian chromosomal aberrations assay in human peripheral blood lymphocytes or in the in vivo rat bone marrow micronucleus assay.”
Transgenic mouse: no oncogenic effects; 2-year rat: thyroid follicular adenoma/carcinoma in females at 4-fold MRHD exposure
“Crinecerfont did not show oncogenic effects in transgenic mice. In the 2-year rat study, crinecerfont increased the incidence of thyroid gland follicular cell adenoma and carcinoma in females at 100 mg/kg crinecerfont (4-fold MRHD exposure).”
Not reported in the public reviews. Reviewers summarise selectively, so this usually means it wasn't discussed publicly, not that it wasn't studied.
Instead of genotoxicity
Not stated in public reviews
Not reported in the public reviews. Reviewers summarise selectively, so this usually means it wasn't discussed publicly, not that it wasn't studied.
DRG histopathology
Not stated in public reviews
Not reported in the public reviews. Reviewers summarise selectively, so this usually means it wasn't discussed publicly, not that it wasn't studied.
Reproductive & developmental
No developmental toxicity in rats; low-incidence craniofacial poly-malformations in rabbits at 2-fold MRHD exposure
“No developmental toxicity was observed in rats at 4-fold higher than human exposure at the maximum recommended human dose (MRHD) based on area under the concentration-time curve (AUC). Crinecerfont was associated with a low incidence of poly-malformations (craniofacial defects) in rabbits at 2-fold higher than human exposure at the MRHD.”
No arrhythmia risk: <5% hERG inhibition and no Purkinje fiber action potential effects at 10 µM
“Crinecerfont showed no potential for clinical arrhythmia risk based on human ether-à-go-go-related gene (hERG) current (<5% inhibition) or isolated rabbit Purkinje fiber action potential assays at up to 10µM crinecerfont concentrations.”
“Negative for mutagenic potential in five Salmonella typhimurium strains (TA98, TA100, TA1535, TA102 and TA1537) at 50-2500 µg/plate concentration (±S9 metabolic activation).”
“In vitro gene mutation assay at the locus TK+/- in mouse lymphoma L5178Y cells/LYM0101 GLP compliance: Yes Valid study: Yes Negative for mutagenic potential at concentration of 12.5- 250 µg/mL (±S9 metabolic activation).”
“The Applicant evaluated the oncogenic potential of crinecerfont by conducting 2-year rat and 6-month transgenic mouse carcinogenicity studies. Crinecerfont did not increase the incidence of tumors in Tg.rasH2 mice treated for 26 weeks at oral doses of 5, 50, 500 or 1500 mg/kg/day.”
<5% hERG inhibition and no Purkinje fiber effects at up to 10 µM
“Crinecerfont showed no potential for clinical arrhythmia risk based on human ether-à-go-go-related gene (hERG) current (<5% inhibition) or isolated rabbit Purkinje fiber action potential assays at up to 10µM crinecerfont concentrations.”
Not genotoxic overall: Ames negative; in vitro chromosome aberration positive without (not with) metabolic activation; rat micronucleus and comet negative