Negative in vivo rat bone marrow micronucleus and liver DNA strand-break assays; overall negative for genotoxicity
“In vivo, vimseltinib administered to rats at doses up to 200 mg/kg/day did not increase bone marrow micronucleated polychromatic erythrocytes, nor did vimseltinib increase liver DNA strand breaks. The overall assessment was that vimseltinib was negative for genotoxicity.”
✓ VerifiedFDA multi-discipline review, p. 39Source ↗
Carcinogenicity
6-month transgenic mouse: negative up to 12.5 mg/kg/day; 104-week rat study ongoing as PMR
“In a 6-month transgenic mouse carcinogenicity study at doses up to 12.5 mg/kg/day, vimseltinib was negative for carcinogenic findings. The Applicant is currently conducting a 104-week carcinogenicity study in Sprague Dawley rats to be submitted as a PMR.”
✓ VerifiedFDA multi-discipline review, p. 39Source ↗
Instead of carcinogenicity
Not stated in public reviews
Not reported in the public reviews. Reviewers summarise selectively, so this usually means it wasn't discussed publicly, not that it wasn't studied.
Instead of genotoxicity
Not stated in public reviews
Not reported in the public reviews. Reviewers summarise selectively, so this usually means it wasn't discussed publicly, not that it wasn't studied.
DRG histopathology
Not stated in public reviews
Not reported in the public reviews. Reviewers summarise selectively, so this usually means it wasn't discussed publicly, not that it wasn't studied.
Reproductive & developmental
Rat EFD: skeletal variations at ≥2.5 mg/kg/day and cardiac malformations at 15 mg/kg/day
“Structural abnormalities (skeletal variations) occurred at ≥2.5 mg/kg/day (approximately 3 times the exposure at the recommended dose based on AUC). Additional structural abnormalities (cardiac malformations) were observed at the highest dose of 15 mg/kg/day”
No ECG, QTcF, heart rate or blood pressure effects in dogs up to 15 mg/kg
“In the dog cardiovascular (CV) safety pharmacology study, no vimseltinib-related qualitative electrocardiogram (ECG) effects or quantitative changes in PR interval, QRS duration, QT interval, QT interval corrected by Fridericia’s formula (QTcF) interval, heart rate (HR), arterial pressure, or body temperature were seen at doses up to 15 mg/kg.”
✓ VerifiedFDA multi-discipline review, p. 49Source ↗
Genotox: Ames
Negative (Ames)
“Vimseltinib was not mutagenic in the bacterial reverse mutation assay (Ames).”
✓ VerifiedFDA multi-discipline review, p. 39Source ↗
Genotox: in vitro mammalian
In vitro micronucleus: positive (increased micronuclei after 24-hour incubation without metabolic activation)
“In an in vitro micronucleus assay, vimseltinib increased micronuclei after a 24-hour incubation in the absence of metabolic activation.”
✓ VerifiedFDA multi-discipline review, p. 39Source ↗
Genotox: in vivo
In vivo rat bone marrow micronucleus and liver DNA strand-break assays: negative
“In vivo, vimseltinib administered to rats at doses up to 200 mg/kg/day did not increase bone marrow micronucleated polychromatic erythrocytes, nor did vimseltinib increase liver DNA strand breaks.”
✓ VerifiedFDA multi-discipline review, p. 39Source ↗
Carcinogenicity model
6-month transgenic mouse (negative); 104-week Sprague Dawley rat (ongoing)
“In a 6-month transgenic mouse carcinogenicity study at doses up to 12.5 mg/kg/day, vimseltinib was negative for carcinogenic findings. The Applicant is currently conducting a 104-week carcinogenicity study in Sprague Dawley rats to be submitted as a PMR.”
✓ VerifiedFDA multi-discipline review, p. 39Source ↗
Carcinogenicity timing
26-week RasH2 mouse completed; 104-week Sprague Dawley rat study ongoing at approval, final report as PMR
“The Applicant is conducting a 104-Week rat carcinogenicity study of vimseltinib in Sprague Dawley rats (DCC-3014-04-0025, eCTD 2.6.7 Table 21).”
✓ VerifiedFDA multi-discipline review, p. 76Source ↗
hERG / QT
hERG IC50 not calculable; 17% or less inhibition at solubility-limited maximum concentrations
“In the in vitro human ether-à-go-go-related gene (hERG) study, the half maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50) values for inhibition of the hERG potassium current by vimseltinib and DP-7005 could not be calculated due to 17% or less inhibition at the maximum concentrations that could be tested at the solubility limits of the two compounds”
✓ VerifiedFDA multi-discipline review, p. 49Source ↗
Not genotoxic overall: Ames negative; in vitro chromosome aberration positive without (not with) metabolic activation; rat micronucleus and comet negative