Not conducted by the applicant; published studies negative in Ames, chromosome aberration and in vivo mouse micronucleus tests
“The Applicant did not conduct genotoxicity studies with lactitol and relied on the published literature. Lactitol was examined for potential mutagenicity in the Ames test, chromosome aberration test with cultured mammalian cells, and in vivo mouse micronucleus test. The results showed that lactitol has no mutagenicity potential”
✓ VerifiedFDA multi-discipline review, p. 39Source ↗
Carcinogenicity
2-year rat and 6-month Tg.rasH2 mouse: no drug-related tumors up to 2 g/kg/day
“In a 2-year carcinogenicity study in rats, lactitol was not tumorigenic at daily oral doses up to 2 g/kg/day (about 0.93 times the recommended daily human dose based on body surface area). In a 6-month carcinogenicity study in Tg.rasH2 mice at daily oral doses of lactitol up to 2 g/kg/day (about 0.47 times the recommended daily human dose based on body surface area), there were no drug-related neoplasms.”
Not reported in the public reviews. Reviewers summarise selectively, so this usually means it wasn't discussed publicly, not that it wasn't studied.
Instead of genotoxicity
Not stated in public reviews
Not reported in the public reviews. Reviewers summarise selectively, so this usually means it wasn't discussed publicly, not that it wasn't studied.
DRG histopathology
Not stated in public reviews
Not reported in the public reviews. Reviewers summarise selectively, so this usually means it wasn't discussed publicly, not that it wasn't studied.
Reproductive & developmental
Rat and rabbit EFD: no embryo-fetal effects at doses well above the human dose
“In animal developmental studies, no effects on embryo-fetal development were observed with oral administration of lactitol to rats and rabbits during organogenesis at doses much higher than the maximum recommended human dosage.”
Not reported in the public reviews. Reviewers summarise selectively, so this usually means it wasn't discussed publicly, not that it wasn't studied.
Genotox: Ames
Negative (published Ames test)
“Published studies (referenced in Section 5.5.1/General toxicology; additional studies) indicated that lactitol was negative in the Ames test, chromosome aberration test with cultured mammalian cells, and in vivo mouse micronucleus test.”
✓ VerifiedFDA multi-discipline review, p. 30Source ↗
Genotox: in vitro mammalian
Chromosome aberration test in cultured mammalian cells (published): negative
“Published studies (referenced in Section 5.5.1/General toxicology; additional studies) indicated that lactitol was negative in the Ames test, chromosome aberration test with cultured mammalian cells, and in vivo mouse micronucleus test.”
✓ VerifiedFDA multi-discipline review, p. 30Source ↗
Genotox: in vivo
Mouse micronucleus (published): negative
“Published studies (referenced in Section 5.5.1/General toxicology; additional studies) indicated that lactitol was negative in the Ames test, chromosome aberration test with cultured mammalian cells, and in vivo mouse micronucleus test.”
✓ VerifiedFDA multi-discipline review, p. 30Source ↗
Carcinogenicity model
26-week Tg.rasH2 mouse (no drug-related neoplasms); 104-week rat
“In a 26-week oral (gavage) carcinogenicity study in Tg.rasH2 mice at 225, 675 and 2000 mg/kg/day, there were no drug-related neoplasms in either males or females. The 104-week oral carcinogenicity study in rats was initiated in February 2017, and the study report will be submitted post approval, as per agreement with the Agency.”
✓ VerifiedFDA multi-discipline review, p. 30Source ↗
Carcinogenicity timing
26-week Tg.rasH2 mouse completed; 104-week rat started February 2017, report to be submitted after approval
“In a 26-week oral (gavage) carcinogenicity study in Tg.rasH2 mice at 225, 675 and 2000 mg/kg/day, there were no drug-related neoplasms in either males or females. The 104-week oral carcinogenicity study in rats was initiated in February 2017, and the study report will be submitted post approval, as per agreement with the Agency.”
✓ VerifiedFDA multi-discipline review, p. 30Source ↗
hERG / QT
No hERG or dedicated QT study; phase 3 ECG data showed no clinically relevant QT effect
“The Applicant has not conducted a dedicated QT prolongation study. The ECG data from phase 3 studies BLI400-301 and BLI400-302 did not indicate clinically relevant effects of lactitol on the QT interval in CIC patients.”
✓ VerifiedFDA multi-discipline review, p. 49Source ↗
Not genotoxic overall: Ames negative; in vitro chromosome aberration positive without (not with) metabolic activation; rat micronucleus and comet negative