Negative in Ames and in vivo micronucleus; positive (mutagenic and clastogenic) in in vitro mouse lymphoma assay
“Omidenepag was not mutagenic in the bacterial reverse mutation (Ames) test and the in vivo mouse micronucleus test. Omidenepag isopropyl was positive (mutagenic and clastogenic) without metabolic activation in the in vitro mouse lymphoma forward mutation assay.”
Lifetime rodent studies not conducted; nephroblastoma and spermatic cord tumor in 26-week rat subcutaneous study
“Lifetime rodent studies have not been performed to evaluate the carcinogenic potential of omidenepag isopropyl or omidenepag. In rats dosed by subcutaneous injection daily for 26 weeks, nephroblastoma and a spermatic cord tumor were found at 0.003 mg/kg/day (33 times the RHOD based on the estimated area under the curve [AUC]).”
Not reported in the public reviews. Reviewers summarise selectively, so this usually means it wasn't discussed publicly, not that it wasn't studied.
Instead of genotoxicity
Not stated in public reviews
Not reported in the public reviews. Reviewers summarise selectively, so this usually means it wasn't discussed publicly, not that it wasn't studied.
DRG histopathology
Not stated in public reviews
Not reported in the public reviews. Reviewers summarise selectively, so this usually means it wasn't discussed publicly, not that it wasn't studied.
Reproductive & developmental
Rabbit EFD: fetal skeletal anomalies at 24x clinical exposure; not teratogenic in rats
“In animal reproduction studies, subcutaneous administration of omidenepag isopropyl to pregnant rabbits throughout the period of organogenesis produced fetal skeletal anomalies at a dose of 24 times the clinical dose, based on estimated plasma C max .”
Rat micronucleus: wholly inadequate per FDA (dose selection too low)
“The study is wholly inadequate to evaluate potential clastogenicity, because dose selection was too low to adequately characterize potential activity.”
✓ VerifiedFDA pharmacology/toxicology review, p. 132Source ↗
Carcinogenicity model
Not conducted; 26-week sc rat study: nephroblastoma and spermatic cord tumor at 0.003 mg/kg/day (33x RHOD AUC)
“Lifetime rodent studies have not been performed to evaluate the carcinogenic potential of omidenepag isopropyl or omidenepag. In rats dosed by subcutaneous injection daily for 26 weeks, nephroblastoma and a spermatic cord tumor were found at 0.003 mg/kg/day (33 times the RHOD based on the estimated area under the curve [AUC]).”
Carcinogenicity studies not conducted with omidenepag isopropyl or omidenepag
“Carcinogenicity testing has not been performed with omidenepag isopropyl or omidenepag.”
✓ VerifiedFDA pharmacology/toxicology review, p. 136Source ↗
hERG / QT
Dog inhalation CV study not concerning for ocular dosing: ~150x systemic exposure margin (Cmax and AUC)
“These results are not concerning for topical ocular dosing, based on the systemic exposure margin (approximately 150 x from the low-dose TK means to the clinical PK means for both Cmax and AUC).”
✓ VerifiedFDA pharmacology/toxicology review, p. 43Source ↗
Not genotoxic overall: Ames negative; in vitro chromosome aberration positive without (not with) metabolic activation; rat micronucleus and comet negative