CarcinogenicityQuestioned
No rodent carcinogenicity bioassays; applicant cited the ICH S1A ocular-route provision
Why: ICH S1A: ocular-route products may not need carcinogenicity studies; reviewer found 26-week rat and monkey ocular results concerning · Within the guideline
“As justification for not conducting carcinogenicity studies, the Applicant: o Cited ICH S1A42, “Pharmaceuticals administered by the ocular route may not need carcinogenicity studies unless there is cause for concern or unless there is significant systemic exposure.””
✓ VerifiedFDA pharmacology/toxicology review, p. 136Source ↗ “The results of the 26-week rat subcutaneous toxicity study, and the monkey topical ocular studies, are concerning.”
✓ VerifiedFDA pharmacology/toxicology review, p. 12Source ↗ GenotoxicityAccepted with a conditionBeyond the letter
In vivo rat micronucleus test with inadequate dose selection; adequate in vivo genotoxicity test to be required
Why: Adequate in vivo genotoxicity test recommended as a postmarketing requirement under ICH S2(R1)
“The in vivo rat micronucleus test (report # 02-226) dose selection was inadequate.”
✓ VerifiedFDA pharmacology/toxicology review, p. 14Source ↗ “P/T recommends that an adequate in vivo test for genotoxicity be required, consistent with ICH S2(R1).”
✓ VerifiedFDA pharmacology/toxicology review, p. 14Source ↗ Safety marginVerdict not stated
No NOAEL identified in the 39-week monkey topical ocular study
“The GLP monkey 39-week topical ocular toxicity study with omidenepag isopropyl did not identify a NOAEL.”
✓ VerifiedFDA pharmacology/toxicology review, p. 12Source ↗ OtherQuestioned
Rat subcutaneous toxicity studies did not include nasal cavity histopathology
“The rat sc studies did not include histopathology of the nasal turbinates / nasal cavity.”
✓ VerifiedFDA pharmacology/toxicology review, p. 12Source ↗