Nonclinical precedent Request an invite

Blenrep: what was done before first-in-human, and what came after?

belantamab mafodotin · BCMA

Before first-in-human

First-in-human: where
Not stated in public reviews
Not reported in the public reviews. Reviewers summarise selectively, so this usually means it wasn't discussed publicly, not that it wasn't studied.
Repeat-dose tox before first-in-human
3-week weekly-dosing monkey toxicology study (IND-enabling)
“The FDA notes that the 3-week (IND-enabling) and 13-week toxicology st udies conducted in monkeys with weekly dosing for belantamab mafodotin had comparable t oxicities and exposures.”
✓ VerifiedFDA multi-discipline review, p. 65Source ↗
First-in-human starting dose
Rationale not stated; first-in-human DREAMM-1 escalated from 0.03 to 4.6 mg/kg Q3W
“The FTIH study DREAMM-1 evaluated dose levels from 0.03 to 4.6 mg/kg Q3W and selected 3.4 mg/kg Q3W based on emerging efficacy, safety, and pharmacokinetic data for evaluation in Part 2 of the study.”
✓ VerifiedFDA multi-discipline review (BLA 761158, 2020 accelerated approval (withdrawn 2023; approved again Oct 2025)), p. 91Source ↗

Longest repeat-dose systemic studies

Longest repeat-dose study and recovery
13-week rat (IV q3w) and monkey (IV weekly) GLP studies, each with 12-week recovery
“The 3-week and 13-week rat studies utilized weekly and every 3 weeks (q3w) dosing regimens, respectively. Monkeys were dosed in GLP-compliant repeat-dose general toxicology studies for 3 or 13 weeks with IV bolus doses of 0, 1, 3, or 10 mg/kg belantamab mafodotin, with 12-week recovery periods.”
✓ VerifiedFDA multi-discipline review, p. 31Source ↗
Pivotal GLP studies
GLP IV: rat 3-week (weekly) and 13-week (q3w); monkey 3- and 13-week (weekly); 12-week recovery
“The 3-week and 13-week rat studies utilized weekly and every 3 weeks (q3w) dosing regimens, respectively. Monkeys were dosed in GLP-compliant repeat-dose general toxicology studies for 3 or 13 weeks with IV bolus doses of 0, 1, 3, or 10 mg/kg belantamab mafodotin, with 12-week recovery periods.”
✓ VerifiedFDA multi-discipline review (BLA 761158, 2020 accelerated approval (withdrawn 2023; approved again Oct 2025)), p. 31Source ↗

DART package

Species: DART
Not conducted (ICH S9): cytotoxic ADC expected to be embryo/fetotoxic and teratogenic
“Reproductive and developmental studies have not been conducted since cytotoxic drugs such as belantamab mafodotin which target rapidly dividing cells, particularly in the bone marrow, are expected to be embryo/ fetotoxic and teratogenic. This position is consistent with ICH S9 guidance.”
✓ VerifiedFDA multi-discipline review, p. 67Source ↗
Reproductive & developmental
Not conducted (ICH S9): cytotoxic/genotoxic ADC expected embryo-fetotoxic and teratogenic
“Reproductive and developmental studies were not conducted since cytotoxic (i.e. genotoxic) drugs such as belantamab mafodotin which target rapidly dividing cells, are expected to be embryo/feto toxic and teratogenic. This position is consistent with the ICH S9 guidance.”
✓ VerifiedFDA multi-discipline review (BLA 761158, 2020 accelerated approval (withdrawn 2023; approved again Oct 2025)), p. 31Source ↗
PPND / ePPND: when
No PPND study: cytotoxic (genotoxic) ADC expected to be embryo/fetotoxic and teratogenic (ICH S9)
“Reproductive and developmental studies were not conducted since cytotoxic (i.e. genotoxic) drugs such as belantamab mafodotin which target rapidly dividing cells, are expected to be embryo/feto toxic and teratogenic. This position is consistent with the ICH S9 guidance.”
✓ VerifiedFDA multi-discipline review, p. 31Source ↗

Carcinogenicity

Species: carcinogenicity
Not conducted
“No carcinogenicity studies have been conducted to support the development of belantamab mafodotin.”
✓ VerifiedFDA multi-discipline review, p. 67Source ↗
Carcinogenicity model
Not conducted (ICH S9, S6(R1))
“The absence of carcinogenicity studies is accepted in line with the ICH S9 and S6(R1) guidelines.”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 44Source ↗
Carcinogenicity timing
Not required: no carcinogenicity studies (ICH S9, S6(R1))
“The absence of carcinogenicity studies is accepted in line with the ICH S9 and S6(R1) guidelines.”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 44Source ↗

Email me this as a cited memo

Tox package for Blenrep, each with the regulator's own words, the page and a link. Ready to paste into a briefing document or send to your team.

Same question, other ADCs

Enhertu

fam-trastuzumab deruxtecan · HER2
Japan and US: multicenter first-in-human study (Study DS8201-A-J101)

Adcetris

brentuximab vedotin · CD30
Not stated in public reviews

Besponsa

inotuzumab ozogamicin · CD22
Not stated in public reviews

Datroway

datopotamab deruxtecan · Trop-2
Not stated in public reviews

Decnupaz

pivekimab sunirine · CD123
Not stated in public reviews

Elahere

mirvetuximab soravtansine · FRα
Not stated in public reviews

Emrelis

telisotuzumab vedotin · c-Met
Not stated in public reviews

Kadcyla

ado-trastuzumab emtansine · HER2
Not stated in public reviews

Mylotarg

gemtuzumab ozogamicin · CD33
Not stated in public reviews

Padcev

enfortumab vedotin · Nectin-4
Not stated in public reviews

Polivy

polatuzumab vedotin · CD79b
Not stated in public reviews

Tivdak

tisotumab vedotin · Tissue factor
Not stated in public reviews

Trodelvy

sacituzumab govitecan · Trop-2
Not stated in public reviews

Zynlonta

loncastuximab tesirine · CD19
Not stated in public reviews

Summary across all 15 ADCs →