“Repeat-dose toxicology studies were conducted in mice (4-weeks and 13-weeks) and monkeys (4-weeks and 13-weeks).”
✓ VerifiedFDA multi-discipline review, p. 33Source ↗
Why that species
Cross-species PK exposure, metabolic profiles, similar or identical CypA binding and identical KRAS GTPase-domain sequence
“Mice and cynomolgus monkeys were considered the relevant test species for in vivo toxicology studies based on cross-species PK exposures, metabolic profiles, similar (mouse) or identical (monkey) binding affinity to human cyclophilin A (CypA), and identical cross-species KRAS protein sequence in the guanosine 5' triphosphatase (GTPase) domain to which daraxonrasib binds.”
✓ VerifiedFDA multi-discipline review, p. 49Source ↗
Surrogate molecule
No surrogate; the clinical compound was tested
“Daraxonrasib was administered once daily by oral gavage in repeat-dose studies to mice and monkeys in toxicity studies for up to 13-weeks in duration.”
✓ VerifiedFDA multi-discipline review, p. 49Source ↗
Species: general tox
Mouse and cynomolgus monkey (4- and 13-week)
“Repeat-dose toxicology studies were conducted in mice (4-weeks and 13-weeks) and monkeys (4-weeks and 13-weeks).”
✓ VerifiedFDA multi-discipline review, p. 33Source ↗
Species: DART
Mouse (EFD only); no fertility studies
“In an embryo-fetal development study in mice (25, 50, and 75 mg/kg/day), daraxonrasib caused embryo-fetal toxicity at ≥50 mg/kg/day (2.5x exposure at the recommended dose based on AUC).”
✓ VerifiedFDA multi-discipline review, p. 34Source ↗
Species: carcinogenicity
Not conducted (advanced cancer, ICH S9)
“Carcinogenicity studies were not conducted with daraxonrasib, consistent with ICH S9 recommendations for advanced cancer indications.”
✓ VerifiedFDA multi-discipline review, p. 34Source ↗
Surrogate used in
No surrogate used; daraxonrasib tested directly in mice and monkeys
“Daraxonrasib was administered once daily by oral gavage in repeat-dose studies to mice and monkeys in toxicity studies for up to 13-weeks in duration.”
✓ VerifiedFDA multi-discipline review, p. 49Source ↗