Not reported in the public reviews. Reviewers summarise selectively, so this usually means it wasn't discussed publicly, not that it wasn't studied.
Repeat-dose tox before first-in-human
Not stated in public reviews
Not reported in the public reviews. Reviewers summarise selectively, so this usually means it wasn't discussed publicly, not that it wasn't studied.
First-in-human starting dose
FIH start dose basis not stated; clinical dose chosen over broad efficacious range using safety data (NHP NOAEL 5x clinical dose)
“Because the pharmacology data indicated that efficacy could be achieved over a broad dose range, the determination of the optimal therapeutic dose also relied on safety data.”
Non-GLP monkey subretinal re-administration study (first eye, then contralateral eye), sacrificed at Days 190 and 217; no recovery phase defined. GLP studies were single-dose (dog)
“Scheduled Sacrifice Time Points Days 190 (two animals) and 217 (two animals)”
✓ VerifiedFDA pharmacology/toxicology review, p. 37Source ↗
Pivotal GLP studies
Subretinal single-dose GLP dog 3-week/3-month; NHP 3-month; bilateral sequential and re-administration studies in dogs and NHP
“In these studies, virus was injected subretinally either once only, or once into each eye, and twice into the same eye.”
Not conducted (limited systemic distribution; no vector DNA in gonads of dogs/NHPs)
“The presence of AAV2-hRPE65v2 was not detected by qPCR in the gonads of healthy NHPs following subretinal administration.”
✓ VerifiedFDA pharmacology/toxicology review, p. 25Source ↗
PPND / ePPND: when
Not conducted or required, based on product attributes, publications and pharmacology/toxicology data
“studies to evaluate safety pharmacology, developmental and reproductive toxicity, genotoxicity, and carcinogenicity/tumorigenicity were not conducted or required for AAV2-hRPE65v2.”
✓ VerifiedFDA summary basis for approval, p. 11Source ↗
Carcinogenicity
Species: carcinogenicity
Not conducted
“No animal studies have been conducted to evaluate the effects of LUXTURNA on carcinogenesis, mutagenesis, and impairment of fertility.”
Not conducted; insertional mutagenesis risk considered low for AAV in post-mitotic retinal cells
“Thus, the risk for AAV vector-induced insertional mutagenesis/carcinogenesis, particularly in post-mitotic cells such as retinal cells, is considered low.”
✓ VerifiedFDA pharmacology/toxicology review, p. 26Source ↗
Carcinogenicity timing
Not required (CHMP advised 2-year rodent studies would not be meaningful)
“CHMP also advised that in vivo testing in 2-year carcinogenicity studies in mice or rats would not contribute meaningful data to assessing the risk of carcinogenicity.”