Briumvi
ublituximab · CD20RecoveryVerdict not stated
26-week monkey study tested a single dose level with no recovery period
Why: Antidrug antibodies caused loss of pharmacological activity at low and mid doses in the 13-week study · Pharmacology or kinetics
“In the 26-week study (0 or 30 mg/kg QW), only one dose level was tested, based on the development of antidrug antibodies, resulting in loss of pharmacological activity, at the low and mid doses in the 13-week study.”
DARTAcceptedBeyond the letter
Monkey ePPND confounded by immunogenicity; embryo-fetal development reassessed in huCD20 transgenic mice
Why: Monkey findings secondary to immunogenicity and not relevant to humans; transgenic mouse is a pharmacologically relevant model · No relevant species · Pharmacology or kinetics
“The findings in cynomolgus monkey were considered secondary to an immunogenic reaction and are not considered relevant to humans. In a subsequent study conducted in pregnant CD20 (huCD20) transgenic mice, a pharmacologically relevant animal model, intravenous administration of ublituximab-xiiy (0, 5, 20, or 50 mg/kg) during organogenesis (gestation day 6 and 12) resulted in no adverse effects on embryofetal development.”
Juvenile toxAccepted with a conditionBeyond the letter
Effects on developing immune function not adequately assessed; postnatal immune function study required postmarketing
Why: Immunogenic effects in dams prevented assessment; study needed to support future paediatric development
“Potential adverse effects of ublituximab exposure during organogenesis on immune function could not be adequately assessed because of the immunogenic effects in dams.”
SpeciesAcceptedBeyond the letter
Monkey-only programme without characterising CD20 binding in other animal species
Why: Single-species justification submitted under the IND was found acceptable
“The sponsor proposed conducting nonclinical studies of ublituximab only in monkey but did not conduct studies to characterize binding to CD20 in other animal species. Justification for this approach was submitted to the Division of Hematology and Oncology Toxicology (DHOT); DHOT found it acceptable.”
GLPAcceptedBeyond the letter
Rabbit local tolerance study and Ames assay not entirely GLP-compliant
Why: Studies not pivotal for the marketing authorisation application · Other reason
“Local tolerance study in rabbit and the bacterial reverse mutation assay, were not (entirely) performed under GLP as stated by the applicant; however, since they are not considered pivotal for the marketing authorisation application, this is considerable acceptable.”