CarcinogenicityAcceptedBeyond the letter
No in vivo carcinogenicity studies; weight-of-evidence assessment from literature and toxicology studies
Why: Executive Carcinogenicity Assessment Committee consulted; no animal studies requested and sponsor's assessment adequate · Weight of evidence
“The Applicant submitted a weight of evidence assessment to address the carcinogenic potential of evinacumab, which was based on information available from relevant literature and animal toxicology studies completed under the IND.”
✓ VerifiedFDA pharmacology/toxicology review, p. 10Source ↗ “No in vivo animal carcinogenicity studies were requested by the Division after consulting with CDER’s Executive Carcinogenicity Assessment Committee (April 18, 2017) and the sponsor’s carcinogenicity assessment is considered adequate.”
✓ VerifiedFDA pharmacology/toxicology review, p. 10Source ↗ Safety marginAccepted with a conditionBeyond the letter
Rabbit fetal malformations (internal hydrocephaly, flexed paws) at exposures below clinical; no margin, mechanism unknown
Why: Unknown mechanism, severity and low exposure margins mean a potential human risk; addressed in Warning and Precaution labeling
“These fetal malformations occur at doses that resulted in less than the clinical exposure.”
✓ VerifiedFDA pharmacology/toxicology review, p. 77Source ↗ “Therefore, we recommend that the embryo-fetal toxicity signal in rabbits be included in the Warning and Precaution section of product labeling.”
✓ VerifiedFDA pharmacology/toxicology review, p. 78Source ↗ Safety marginVerdict not stated
Rat chronic SC NOAEL gives 0.4-fold the MRHD exposure (no margin)
“100 mg/kg/week in both species by the SC route (0.4 and 3-fold the MRHD in rats and monkeys, respectively, based on AUC).”
✓ VerifiedFDA pharmacology/toxicology review, p. 8Source ↗