SpeciesAccepted
Chimpanzee the only relevant species; only a small, limited single/short repeat-dose chimpanzee study, rat studies not relevant
Why: Lack of relevant animal models · No relevant species · Within the guideline
“A small number of chimpanzees, the only relevant species identified for safety testing, were given single or up to 5 once daily repeated doses of infliximab.”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 8Source ↗ “Due to the lack of relevant animal models, the absence of more detailed toxicity data with infliximab was considered acceptable.”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 8Source ↗ DARTAcceptedBeyond the letter
No standard reproductive toxicity studies with infliximab; mouse studies with surrogate anti-mouse TNFα antibody cV1q instead
Why: No relevant animal models; surrogate and genetically modified animal data gave some reassurance · No relevant species · Weight of evidence
“Standard reproductive/developmental toxicity studies have not been performed with infliximab due to lack of relevant animal models. In an attempt to mimic the clinical situation of TNFα inhibition, studies were conducted in mice using a monoclonal antibody against mouse TNFα (cV1q).”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 8Source ↗ “Data from genetically modified animals (i.e. transgenic and knock-out models) and from studies of a monoclonal antibody against mouse TNFα have provided some reassurance regarding carcinogenic potential and reproductive toxicity, although some effects on fertility were observed in mice.”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 9Source ↗ CarcinogenicityAcceptedBeyond the letter
No standard carcinogenicity studies; TNFα knockout mice and anti-murine TNFα antibody data used to address tumour risk
Why: TNFα knockout and anti-murine TNFα antibody data gave no support for enhanced tumour risk · Weight of evidence
“Standard carcinogenicity studies have not been performed with infliximab. A concern was expressed regarding the consequences of long-term inhibition of TNFα in relation to proliferative changes and a potential risk of tumour development.”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 9Source ↗ “These data gave no support for the hypothesis that inhibition of TNFα is associated with an enhanced risk for tumour development.”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 9Source ↗ OtherAcceptedBeyond the letter
Limited preclinical pharmacokinetic documentation
Why: Animal pharmacokinetic data of marginal relevance for safety assessment · No relevant species
“The preclinical pharmacokinetic documentation is limited. Since the relevance of animal pharmacokinetic data on infliximab is marginal for the safety assessment, this was considered acceptable.”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 7Source ↗